International Israel - Iran Conflict: PEACE DEAL CONFIRMED

Choose the following that best describes your position


  • Total voters
    362
  • Poll closed .
Why does it matter if they have in the past agreed to it? It's moot given the US voided the agreement. It's like claiming an your ex-girlfriend is cheating on you after you dumped her.

I'm not talking about the JCPOA kiddo. I'm talking about their agreements with the UN, IAEA, and the NPT.


Hope this helps.
 
I'm not talking about the JCPOA kiddo. I'm talking about their agreements with the UN, IAEA, and the NPT.


Hope this helps.
So they're ignoring international law like Israel has done with its nuclear program and helping South Africa proliferate, as well as Israel's blatantly illegal war here.

Are you disagreeing that any of those three actions are equally or more illegal?
 
Which of Iran's current delivery vehicles can support a country's first attempt at a nuclear warhead?

The Shahab-3, Ghadr, Khorramshahr and Emad missiles systems are capable of housing a nuclear warhead.
 
So they're ignoring international law like Israel has done with its nuclear program and helping South Africa proliferate, as well as Israel's blatantly illegal war here.

Are you disagreeing that any of those three actions are equally or more illegal?

I am disagreeing there is any parity because only Iran has been belligerently threatening to use them and while arming terrorists and Russia.
 
Why would Iran do that and listen to the UN when they're actively being sanctioned and Trump pulled out of the deal because of Israel? They enriched uranium as a direct result of Trump pulling out of the deal. They would otherwise have zero leverage to get the sanctions taken off.

And it's funny you use the UN in your arguments and completely ignore the UN's pleas for Israel to stop committing war crimes and starving people.

So the UN is correct when they criticize Iran, but 100% wrong and to be completely ignored when they criticize Israel.

I don't disagree Trump is directly responsible for Iran's belligerence, but it is clearly not a lie they are the only non-nuclear power on earth in possession of near weapons grade uranium.
 
The Shahab-3, Ghadr, Khorramshahr and Emad missiles systems are capable of housing a nuclear warhead.
What evidence do you have that Iran has the ability to successfully miniaturize a nuclear weapon the first attempt to that extent?

Let alone without even a cold test.
I am disagreeing there is any parity because only Iran has been belligerently threatening to use them and while arming terrorists and Russia.
Israel literally helped apartheid South Africa hold an illegal nuclear weapons test and produce nuclear weapons.

Are you really trying to argue that South Africa did not have as evil a regime? Come on.

Non-proliferation regimes are quite cut and dry, they don't take into consideration a country's morals.
 
What the fuck did I just read?
"Yeah I get that about segregation, but have you considered arguing semantics?"
My man is a born redditor
lol.. the topic was religious fundamentalism….you seem lost.
 
Holy shit, the way the word "failure" was pronounced is spot on for his delivery

Legit question here a la @Deorum ITT, why do you think Iran has built a high level enrichment facility in a granite mountain and going to 60%? What are the possibilities for enriching 12 times higher than needed for energy uses?
Hey @Hog-train did you come up with anything for this question?
 
What evidence do you have that Iran has the ability to successfully miniaturize a nuclear weapon the first attempt to that extent?

Let alone without even a cold test.

Israel literally helped apartheid South Africa hold an illegal nuclear weapons test and produce nuclear weapons.

Are you really trying to argue that South Africa did not have as evil a regime? Come on.

Non-proliferation regimes are quite cut and dry, they don't take into consideration a country's morals.

We're talking about things that are happening now, not 100 years ago.

Iran is arming terrorists and Russia now. They're directly responsible for prolonging the conflict in Ukraine, the deadliest conflict in modern history with over 2 million casualties all together.
 
I don't disagree Trump is directly responsible for Iran's belligerence, but it is clearly not a lie they are the only non-nuclear power on earth in possession of near weapons grade uranium.

That still doesn't justify Israel just attacking the shit out of them and bombing Tehran. And then just expecting the US to go to war for them.

If Trump is believed, he was in talks with them and was supposed to meet on that Sunday. Then Israel just attacked. That's sabotage.

If Trump is lying, then he is complicit with Israel and conspired to go to war when there was a chance for a new deal and diplomacy.

Either way, there was a chance to reach a deal, but Israel just attacked. And I'm against war unless absolutely unavoidable.

You, on the other hand, just want war because you're a shill for Israel.

Hey @Hog-train did you come up with anything for this question?

Already answered multiple times ITT.

Iran joined the JCPOA nuclear agreement under Obama. They were abiding by everything, but in 2018, Trump pulled out of the deal due to political pressure from Netanyahu and Israel.

Then Trump re-imposed and expanded heavy sanctions on Iran. So in response, Iran started enriching uranium to have a bargaining chip to ease those sanctions "If you stop sanctioning us, we will stop enriching uranium and do a new deal."
 
Last edited:
We're talking about things that are happening now, not 100 years ago.
Apartheid ended barely 30 years ago, and Israel's assistance in South African proliferation is barely older than that. Trotting out the "that's ancient history argument" is prime facie evidence you can't refute the point.
Iran is arming terrorists and Russia now. They're directly responsible for prolonging the conflict in Ukraine, the deadliest conflict in modern history with over 2 million casualties all together.
Russia would still be in this conflict one way or another, there's too much inertia behind it.

You never answered: What evidence is there that Iran has miniaturized nuclear weapons enough to mount on a missile?
 
That still doesn't justify Israel just attacking the shit out of them and bombing Tehran. And then just expecting the US to go to war for them.

If Trump is believed, he was in talks with them and was supposed to meet on that Sunday. Then Israel just attacked. That's sabotage.

If Trump is lying, then he is complicit with Israel and conspired to go to war when there was a chance for a new deal and diplomacy.

Either way, there was a chance to reach a deal, but Israel just attacked. And I'm against war unless absolutely unavoidable.

You, on the other hand, just want war because you're a shill for Israel.

No I want the Iranian regime to cease to exist so the ancient Persian people can be free. The near 10 million Iranian expats can return to their ancestral homes without fear of being hung to death from a crane on the street for no crime at all. I want the Iranian regime to stop arming Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis and everyone in between so we can actually start working toward peace in the region.

And most importantly I want the Iranian regime to stop arming Russia with hundreds of thousands of lethal munitions to use on the Ukrainian people.
 
Back
Top