International Israel - Iran Conflict: PEACE DEAL CONFIRMED

[El Panteron]

seems like you’ll try to shift the conversation in any direction to avoid acknowledging Zionism is nothing like fundamentalist religious groups.

Muslim citizens of Israel have the same legal rights as Jewish citizens. And again, the laws are secular.

This isn’t hard.

You: muslims can live in Israel no problem

Me: there's apartheid

You: STOP SHIFTING THE CONVERSATION

I'll dance with you no problem brother but you're not controlling the conversation.
If we can both agree that muslim Palestinians live in segregation (which something we don't have to agree on because everyone knows it, it's something that happens), then do I give a fuck if the people that make these laws are secular or religious or anything in between? Nope, the result is the same. So if you want to equate them to zealots, to freedom fighters, to crusaders, to dogs, to horses, I don't care

 

[Rational Poster]

First bomb that falls on Iran by a us jet loses him half his base.

What does he care? You weirdos already voted him in. He's not eligible for another term.

 

[Strychnine]

If you want to go all-in Bibi, then YOU do it. As I see it?

You can call me Bennett, 'cause I ain't in it.

 

[MrShady]

You're using this to justify what Trump wants to do now?

You do realize everybody hated Clinton right? Like she might as well be a Cheney or Bush.

So you're implying Trump belongs with that crowd as well then huh. Makes sense.

War mongers and pillagers, looting the very nation they're supposed to represent.

Who was the last president who actually had America's best interests at heart? Sincerely asking.

 

[Aegon Spengler]

You're using this to justify what Trump wants to do now?

You do realize everybody hated Clinton right? Like she might as well be a Cheney or Bush.

So you're implying Trump belongs with that crowd as well then huh. Makes sense.

War mongers and pillagers, looting the very nation they're supposed to represent.

Who was the last president who actually had America's best interests at heart? Sincerely asking.

That depends on what you mean by “America” - but probably Jimmy Carter if you mean middle and working class Americans.

 

[MrShady]

Tulsi should resign, call Trump out, and when this ultimately blows up in Trumps face and he loses half of his base, use that as leverage for running in the next election.

Any self respecting person would have already resigned. The signals were blinking months ago that shit would hit the fan with this administration. These parasites like Tulsi or Pam Blondi or Kristi Cosplay or Whiskeybreath will go down with the ship until Trump himself no longer needs them (like a Rudy Giuliani).

In a cult, Trump can do no wrong. Even when he bashes a cult member, the member will still find a way to rationalize it.

 

[MrShady]

That depends on what you mean by “America” - but probably Jimmy Carter if you mean middle and working class Americans.

That's what I was thinking. AIPAC really got a stranglehold on America since then.

 

[Aegon Spengler]

Any self respecting person would have already resigned. The signals were blinking months ago that shit would hit the fan with this administration. These parasites like Tulsi or Pam Blondi or Kristi Cosplay or Whiskeybreath will go down with the ship until Trump himself no longer needs them (like a Rudy Giuliani).

In a cult, Trump can do no wrong. Even when he bashes a cult member, the member will still find a way to rationalize it.

Yeah. Even Mike Pence kind of bent the knee at the end and Trump would have been fine with his mob of goons hanging him.

People who love power, love it unconditionally

 

[Oeshon]

Trump wants to axe Tulsi Gabbard for telling the truth about nukes in Iran.

Trump Contemplating Axing Tulsi Gabbard's Office, Saying She 'Doesn't Add Anything' to His Admin: Report "
https://www.latintimes.com/trump-co...ying-she-doesnt-add-anything-his-admin-585231
[Trump] doesn't like it when people are off message," a senior official said

so Trump is completely compromised by Israel. Nice.

 

[El Panteron]

Who was the last president who actually had America's best interests at heart? Sincerely asking.

You know moron will answer "Reagan" with a straight face.

 

[Snubnoze707]

Any self respecting person would have already resigned. The signals were blinking months ago that shit would hit the fan with this administration. These parasites like Tulsi or Pam Blondi or Kristi Cosplay or Whiskeybreath will go down with the ship until Trump himself no longer needs them (like a Rudy Giuliani).

In a cult, Trump can do no wrong. Even when he bashes a cult member, the member will still find a way to rationalize it.

Perhaps, but this situation is central to her principles, or at least what she projects those to be. She's a total hypocrite on Gaza.

She can still bow out and gain some respect for it. Otherwise Trump fires her, or she rides with this admin down the drain.

 

[Siver!]

Didn't Tulsi leave the Democrats calling them, and I quote, an “elitist cabal of warmongers”.



Now she's going to get sacked by the Republicans for not warmongering.

Daft cow.

 

[BluntForceTrama]

Tulsi should resign, call Trump out, and when this ultimately blows up in Trumps face and he loses half of his base, use that as leverage for running in the next election.

So sure it’s going to blow up in his face are you?

The buffoonery in here is unimaginable

 

[Snubnoze707]

That's what I was thinking. AIPAC really got a stranglehold on America since then.

Wait, Ted Cruz just assured me that they don't and in fact Israel doesn't like AIPAC because they don't have enough influence in our country, not that they control AIPAC, they just talk from time to time.

 

[Snubnoze707]

So sure it’s going to blow up in his face are you?

The buffoonery in here is unimaginable

It's so unimaginable that you can't even use up a bit of that imagination to explain how seeing this for what it is constitutes "buffoonery"...

 

[WhiteMousse]

Sure I will get some grief for this but why is this supported by the ones who were against the Ukraine conflict?

And why are the ones who support the Ukraine conflict against this?

 

[Hog-train]

I'm sure this is fine and no one should be concerned about it.

UN Says It Has Lost Track of Iran’s Near-Bomb-Grade Uranium​

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-18/iran-nuclear-infrastructure-location-of-enriched-uranium-stocks-uncertain

Everyone misplaces hundreds of kilos of near weapons grade uranium sometimes.

Your article clearly says the IAEA can't keep track due to Israel's bombing. Did you even read the article or just looked at the title and thought it bolstered your viewpoint?


"The United Nations nuclear watchdog said the location of Iran’s near-bomb-grade stockpile of enriched uranium cannot currently be verified, as Israel’s ongoing military assault is preventing inspectors from doing their work.

The IAEA chief’s comments highlight one of the primary dilemmas of attacks on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. While the Israeli bombardment has undoubtedly affected the country’s ability to produce new volumes of enriched uranium, the world risks losing track of existing inventories that could quite quickly be further enriched to weapons grade.

International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grossi says important facilities at Iran’s Natanz enrichment facility were “badly hit” during Israeli strikes. Speaking on Bloomberg Television, he added that there was no significant damage to the Fordow site.

Isfahan has been “repeatedly hit with a few buildings being affected,” Grossi said.
Until Israel’s attacks began late last week, IAEA inspectors were conducting more than one visit a day to Iranian nuclear sites."

 

[Rational Poster]

Your article clearly says the IAEA can't keep track due to Israel's bombing. Did you even read the article or just look at the title and thought it bolstered your viewpoint?


"The United Nations nuclear watchdog said the location of Iran’s near-bomb-grade stockpile of enriched uranium cannot currently be verified, as Israel’s ongoing military assault is preventing inspectors from doing their work.

The IAEA chief’s comments highlight one of the primary dilemmas of attacks on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. While the Israeli bombardment has undoubtedly affected the country’s ability to produce new volumes of enriched uranium, the world risks losing track of existing inventories that could quite quickly be further enriched to weapons grade.

International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grossi says important facilities at Iran’s Natanz enrichment facility were “badly hit” during Israeli strikes. Speaking on Bloomberg Television, he added that there was no significant damage to the Fordow site.

Isfahan has been “repeatedly hit with a few buildings being affected,” Grossi said.
Until Israel’s attacks began late last week, IAEA inspectors were conducting more than one visit a day to Iranian nuclear sites."

Did you miss the part where they also said they are concerned they've been moved to a clandestine facility?

 

[Snubnoze707]

Glad to know I gained a new follower. Thanks for all of the reactions @joy2day! The newest member of the Giggle Crew.

You gonna type something out today, or too worried about getting destroyed, again?

 

[curryjunkie]

Sure I will get some grief for this but why is this supported by the ones who were against the Ukraine conflict?

And why are the ones who support the Ukraine conflict against this?

That question has been asked and answered, quite frankly if you can't work it out yourself, you may have cognitive issues..