- Joined
- Jul 15, 2021
- Messages
- 8,405
- Reaction score
- 10,757
Israel and her enablerswho's the "and crew" snappo?
Israel and her enablerswho's the "and crew" snappo?
Whatever you say dude
and we got a deal. But nobody gets to use the word genocide in the discussion
It's not completely up to them, but conflict tends to empower extremists more than moderates since it destroys civil society.you think the pals will go for a worse terrorist org to lead them next?
They Won't. Radical Muslims are ambush predators that will get the odd few but ultimately will get a much heavier repayment as has been shown many times
They kind of are. Someone has to replace Hamas and Israel's day after planning has been lacking to say the least.That is very true. Which is why they seem to want to hold as much control over the region as they can. They wont leave it up to coincidence.
The gwot failed because we cared way too much about killing them and they were aware from history they could wait us out.

You can still embezzle and steal plenty in peace time. If Israel wants Hamas gone, doing it is the easier part. They still have to provide some day after planning if they want any positive input into the process.Its the entire reason these types of groups thrive on conflict. They get money from all over and leave the peeps poor. There can't be peace or the money stops imo.
Who are they?Israel and her enablers
Sure but funding by Iran etc is better when there is conflict. Not the level now which makes no sense (Oct 7). Now they cannot stay in power. But if there was total and lasting peace then there is little need to fund such groups.You can still embezzle and steal plenty in peace time. If Israel wants Hamas gone, doing it is the easier part. They still have to provide some day after planning if they want any positive input into the process.
LOL pride comes before the fall.
Ok, so who do you want to step in and fill the vacuum in a post Hamas Gaza?Sure but funding by Iran etc is better when there is conflict. Not the level now which makes no sense (Oct 7). Now they cannot stay in power. But if there was total and lasting peace then there is little need to fund such groups.
Just curious, but what makes Israel's nuclear arsenal illegal?
nsarchive.gwu.edu
The Palestinian Authority would be an obvious choice until elections are held. They already govern the west bank. Hamas was only Gaza.Ok, so who do you want to step in and fill the vacuum in a post Hamas Gaza?
Lack of political will on the part of the public, ill-defined and ever changing goals, and poorly managed state building among other issues.Well you tell me why we could win a war with one set of fanatics and not another.
What makes you say that? They have no plan except for ethnically cleansing Gaza which we're told won't happen despite the fact that we hear that suggestion over and over again from Israelis.Also Israel's method looks like it's working to me
Well what are they going to do about it? They can retaliate or they can stop legitimizing Hamas and stop allowing them to walk freely in their countries.
Obviously it’s not good for diplomacy, but the old way wasn’t working either. Perhaps some drastic actions like these are a necessary evil to solve this properly.
Who told you this hippie bullshit? You most certainly can defeat fanatics you just have to fight wars in the total style and not confuse the words surrender and ceasefire . Where the nazis and imperial Japanese at ? They got their asses beat til the didn't wanna fight no more is where.
I'm holding them to the same standards as my own country. The gwot failed because we cared way too much about killing them and they were aware from history they could wait us out.
Therein lies the issue, Israel doesn't want the PA to govern. They didn't want it back in the day when they backed Hamas' rise, and Shin Bet has been flagging that the PA is at the verge of collapse in part due to Israel's strategy of divide and conquer.The Palestinian Authority would be an obvious choice until elections are held. They already govern the west bank. Hamas was only Gaza.
More relevantly, we also very clearly handwaved crimes from terrible people if it helped us govern, such as the the emperor in Japan or all the Nazis we let operate as freelancers after the war.For the record, the deprogramming of the extremist ideologies of Germany and Japan came through the carefully organized Marshall Plan to detox the education system and reconstruct the country so that trust between the Allied and Axis Forces could be cemented.
In WW1, we bombed Germany to bits too and left it in shambles+debt. This primed the conditions for Hitler to rise because Germans were ripe for extremism since the world left them in the trash. So the during the Second World War, we didn’t just leave Germany in pieces to condition room for another Dangerous Ideologue.
Likewise, Bombing the shit out of Cambodia primed the rise of Pol Pot and a similar case with Iraq and ISIS. We didn’t have a dedicated Marshall Plan to drain the system and build trust.
We are talking temporary. They are the only ones with a vested interest until elections. I've heard both sides have been calling for them. But in the meantime its them. Israel may want to govern. Theres no telling with those guys and they say they will occupy. But the right answer is the PA. Whether Israel agrees is something else. You asked me who should.Therein lies the issue, Israel doesn't want the PA to govern. They didn't want it back in the day when they backed Hamas' rise, and Shin Bet has been flagging that the PA is at the verge of collapse in part due to Israel's strategy of divide and conquer.
Any other alternatives?