I don't feel like you're genuine or honest or fair here. You didn't read my replies, you probably skimmed trough some of my replies with an heavy bias, because if not you would never have more than half wrong asumptions like you have. If you really read the comments then you have a serious reading and comprehension problem.
So not 100% or 5/5 accurate at all, but the question is : will you admit it if I prove you wrong? If not why should I take my time to go in length to answer you ? I am willing to tell you what's right and what's wrong in your asumptions with honesty if you can admit a wrong. But if not, I'm not interested in putting my ego against yours to see who has the best internet snarky response.
Also I don't even know what all of that has to do with the subject. You're trying to put me in your little box of republican vs democrats when I couldn't care less about those labels, I'm not even american so my political view absolutely don't fit with that rigid binary system view.
There are people who are liberal, leftists, right wing, alt right, on this very forum that I have strong disagreement with but with who I am also on agreement on other subjects. I am able to keep it cordial with everyone on the political spectrum as long as it's not someone who supports injustice or doing harm to others.
Sneak peek because I'm trying to show goodwill : I'm against abortion unless it is to protect the health of the mother due to medical conditions. That doesn't mean I see anyone who supports abortion as a bad or crazyperson, I realize that pro-abortion people come in different shades and have different arguments, and some have more nuanced takes than others. But yes personnally, I am against it, that's my belief.
Ok fair enough, I will concede that while skimming through your recent post history you didn't strike me as a completely mindless radical leftie, but most of your position do seem to lean left. Nothing wrong with that, I only made the response because you said my last sentence was "asinine", and my last sentence of the post you were responding to was that I think people who have a certain vew on one issue will usually predictably have a certain view on another unrelated issue because that's what their "team" expects of them.
The Russia and Israel thing are a perfect example of this, 9 times out of 10 the same person who is anti-Israel will also be anti-Russia. It's kinda funny because in the case of Israel/Palestine they will be anti-interventionist and tell you that US should not be involved at all and should not be supporting Israel in any way. Meanwhile in the case of Ukraine they will be completely hawkish and insist we should be helping Ukraine and they will justify the 30 billion that's been sent there already.
There is no consistency whatsoever, it's just like the whole Covid vaccine thing, the same people who are against big corporation were suddenly shilling for big Pharma and insisting you take the experimental vaccine, because... well they don't know why, but it seems to infringe on some freedoms that the conservatives seem to value so their position automatically has to be the opposite so they were all in on mandatory vaccinations.... while at the same time being "your body your choice" when it comes to abortion.
And of course the children, what about all the children? They care so much about the children being killed in Gaza, but they don't give a shit about the children being killed in abortion clinics across their own country. Oh but wait, those are "unborn" children so it's different right? Except when they're being climate alarmists and pretending to care about the children of some distant future whose parents haven't even been born yet, suddenly unborn children are a top priority to them.
Just one contradiction after another, zero consistency, just adapt any narrative that suits their argument at the time.
Again, not saying these are all your positions, but that's the trend when dealing with a left leaning person.
