Elections Is Tulsi Gabbard a Russian asset?

Is Tulsi Gabbard Putin's Manchurian Candidate?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Not Sure

Results are only viewable after voting.
WhiteMousse said:
I guess I would need to hear why she thinks Tushi is a Russian asset. Is it just because? Is it just an insult or is there actual reason to suspect her? Genuine question.

One thing is for certain-- Tulsi Gabbard has remarkable and ample assets.
Click to expand...

Freudian slip?

Though I gotta admit, that is a good nickname
 
kpt018 said:
I'm actually deferring to experts on the topic. I'll go with them over some random asshole on Sherdog.
Click to expand...

If you were deferring to experts, or taking any time whatsoever to learn about what was going on there, theres no way you would be this misinformed.

Its like Tim Ryan saying he wanted to go after the Taliban for attacking us on 9/11. If you dont know whats going on, look up some on the ground journalists and documentary filmmakers. But you really should do more research before calling someone a liar.

Deferring to experts?? Tulsi was on the armed services committee, the foreign relations committee and deployed twice to the middle east. She is speaking directly from expertise when she calls the syrian war a regime change war. She is the only candidate that calls out the fact that it even started as a CIA operation in 2011.
 
giusti825 said:
If you were deferring to experts, or taking any time whatsoever to learn about what was going on there, theres no way you would be this misinformed.

Its like Tim Ryan saying he wanted to go after the Taliban for attacking us on 9/11. If you dont know whats going on, look up some on the ground journalists and documentary filmmakers. But you really should do more research before calling someone a liar.

Deferring to experts?? Tulsi was on the armed services committee, the foreign relations committee and deployed twice to the middle east. She is speaking directly from expertise when she calls the syrian war a regime change war. She is the only candidate that calls out the fact that it even started as a CIA operation in 2011.
Click to expand...
Yes, I am deferring to multiple experts that have reported and/or commented/written that our presence there was not a regime change. I'm also stating the obvious - we didn't actually change the regime.
 
giusti825 said:
Hmmm....sounds like youve been getting your news from sources outside of crimea.

I get my news from reputable journalists who actually GO to the countries and get their stories first-hand.

If you're getting your news from people payed $30,000 a day to read off a teleprompter, youre part of the problem.

Our media conglomerates our bought and paid for by our military and medical industral complexes.

This is what a journalist does:


This is what a $30,000 a day repeater (cant in good conscience call him a reporter) sitting in a studio reading off a teleprompter does:
Click to expand...


If you get your information from "reputable journalists" why are you posting videos from a CTer that works for RT?
 
kpt018 said:
Again, I'll take the word of experts over some asshole on Sherdog. What was your previous user name anyway?
Click to expand...

Previous username? You must be clinically retarded. I registered over 5 years before you did.
 
kpt018 said:
Yes, I am deferring to multiple experts that have reported and/or commented/written that our presence there was not a regime change. I'm also stating the obvious - we didn't actually change the regime.
Click to expand...

Because Russia went in to defend Assad in 2015

That put an end to any hopes of deposing his regime. But that does not mean they didn't try.
 
Crim said:
Previous username? You must be clinically retarded. I registered over 5 years before you did.
Click to expand...
Well, since you're an asshole and totally counterproductive to conversation in the WR maybe you should go back to hibernating.
 
I’d say Hildog is the Russian asset at this point. She’s effectively exposed a lot of hypocrisy from the Dems regarding muh Russia and Ukraine. If you’re against them you’re muh Russian. Trump couldn’t have hoped for more during this current news cycle. If he could just shut up and let the Dems eat themselves...but he won’t
 
Last Samurai said:
Because Russia went in to defend Assad in 2015

That put an end to any hopes of deposing his regime. But that does not mean they didn't try.
Click to expand...
That doesn't qualify as a "regime change war". "Assad must go" isn't a policy and putting pressure on him to step down via non-violent means does not qualify as a war.
 
MMAisGod said:
Rarely do I give props to Van Jones on CNN, but respect for calling out Hillary's smear as bs the way he did. It was pretty shameless and vindictive on her part.
Click to expand...
I generally disagree with Van's politics but a few years back I saw a vid of him ambushed by a youtube "journalist" literally on the street in DC and he took the time to engage a productive dialogue. He came off as a very genuine and super articulate person and I gained a lot of healthy respect for him even if I often don't see eye to eye with him
 
kpt018 said:
Well, since you're an asshole and totally counterproductive to conversation in the WR maybe you should go back to hibernating.
Click to expand...

Typical leftist, show irrefutable evidence countering your claims, retort with insults. Though pat yourself on the back with your high post count highlighting your low intellect.
 
kpt018 said:
That doesn't qualify as a "regime change war". "Assad must go" isn't a policy and putting pressure on him to step down via non-violent means does not qualify as a war.
Click to expand...

Giving weapons to rebel groups is non-violent?

And how is that not considered a policy of regime change? What other reason did they have for arming the rebels if not the overthrow of the Assad regime?
 
MicroBrew said:
The troops stationed there were a barrier to Turkish aggression. Your analogy is more aptly applied to the Turks since they supported Jihadists and now they have sent their army into Syria.
Click to expand...

This makes no sense on its face. Turkey is a NATO ally. The United States would have never sent troops to Syria to fight the Turks on Syria's behalf. We were there to oust a government. Just like we did in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya.

This was all planned a week after 9/11. What should really scare people is the fact that through 3 different Administrations, republican and democrat, the plans kept moving forward, almost as if the reins of our foreign policy are so tightly held that it doesn't matter who the president of the United States is.

I'm no fan of Trump, but if he actually keeps his word and pulls us out of Syria, I would welcome and applaud it.

Its a completely illegal situation. First by American Law as Congress never declared war on Syria. Second by International Law as Syria never attacked the US or a NATO ally.

If it doesn't make Americans safer, there shouldn't be a single soldier sent to risk life, limb or sanity being exposed to war.

Here's former presidential candidate General Wesley Clark discussing plans to invade 7 countries in 5 years following 9/11; The list might sound familiar.

 
Last edited:
why would someone delete my obviously comedic alternate poll post?

anyway i chose catapult
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,156
Messages
57,971,444
Members
175,886
Latest member
Dagestanaev

Share this page

Back
Top