Is todays Gane resume better than Aspinal's one?

[mkess101]

I think the guy is talking about specifically the value of the win at the time. Tuivasa was in a title eliminator coming off of 5 straight KO wins. It's pretty obviously a more valuable win at the time it was earned than tybura was or ever has been. Dont be silly now.

Oh that's his criteria? But then Pavlovich is still only 2 points despite 6 consecutive KO wins (including one of them over Tuivasa who's allegedly a 2 point guy) and who was ranked #1?

Bro, you can try to cover for TS's clown shoes obvious bias but you can only spin so long.

 

[Evbo]

I think the guy is talking about specifically the value of the win at the time.

That's because it helps his facile and poorly-thought out argument that makes no sense when you look at it through objective eyes

 

[Takes Two To Tango]

Doesn't matter, they'll fight each other and settle it that way. But I think a lot of you guys will be surprised how competitive Gane will be against Aspinall.

 

[RockyLockridge]

Oh that's his criteria? But then Pavlovich is still only 2 points despite 6 consecutive KO wins (including one of them over Tuivasa who's allegedly a 2 point guy) and who was ranked #1?

Bro, you can try to cover for TS's clown shoes obvious bias but you can only spin so long.

Pavlovich should be 3 I agree.


but tuivasa is a patently better win than tybura at the time gane got it. That's all.

 

[mkess101]

Pavlovich should be 3 I agree.

Fair enough. You're being consistent then at least, TS clearly has an agenda. (And iirc his previous post history solidifies that).

 

[GluttonforPunishment]

Can you (kindly) fuck off.

Tuivasa 2 points, Tybura 1 point?

Gee, wonder if there's any bias here LMAO? It's not like Tybura finished Tuivasa inside a round. Oh wait...

Oh shit and Spivak too! He finished Tuivasa inside 2 rounds LOLOL!

You clowns have either stopped trying, or have (somehow) gotten even dumber.

Hmm... and review of one's bias by someone who who has a clear bias towards Jones and immediately jumped on the dick of aspinal. Yet here you are complaining about bias. Stfu

 

[Qays Stetkevich]

A win over Tai is as good as wins over Spivac and Tybura combined even though both finished Tai. His scoring is very unbiased and he has no agenda at all.

Right? The irony of not being able to do math while doing an MMAth post.

 

[Doctor Grudge]

That's ridiculous. You aren't beholden when making lists like this to the rankings at the time (which are arbitrary anyway). You can SEE who the better fighter is. Tuivasa didn't "age out" and get well into his 40's or something. He got exposed. The UFC "ranking" him higher than he deserves because he drinks beer from a shoe and is more popular than someone like Spivac or Tybura doesn't negate the fact that those two easily handled him in ACTUAL FIGHTS.

lol

 

[RockyLockridge]

Right? The irony of not being able to do math while doing an MMAth post.

IMO, It is deeper than that.

Michael johnson has wins over tony and Dustin but wins over tony and dustin are worth more than Michael Johnson.

this is not that situation, I understand, but it's not uncommon for this rhetoric to exist. Nog and shogun vs Sokoudjou as another example

 

[Kung Fu Kowboy]

Gane saved @Kowboy On Sherdog from a tree once, me and @HI SCOTT NEWMAN @BroRogan were so relived

@Luthien that was wholesome/cute next time I'm looking for another place to chill and hang out

@HI SCOTT NEWMAN sneaking up on the DDP v Khamzat PBP

 

[Qays Stetkevich]

IMO, It is deeper than that.

Michael johnson has wins over tony and Dustin but wins over tony and dustin are worth more than Michael Johnson.

this is not that situation, I understand, but it's not uncommon for this rhetoric to exist. Nog and shogun vs Sokoudjou as another example

Agreed and good point, but that makes OP's post even more pointless, because on top of trying to MMAth, he's not consistent. Plus, in recent memory, the snoozers Spivak and Tybura both beat Tai, yet OP doesn't take that into account.

lol Also, waaaaay back when, I was getting a friend into MMA and we were watching the later Prides live, so OF COURSE I talked up Arona and lil Nog only to have Sokoudjou starch them. . . .and then go on to be a legendary-level scrub. MMA is such a fickle sport

 

[Gregoire1]

Aspnall's fangirls are here , its normal (more Jones haters), their frustration is very manifest (and will be worse after this autumn), but objective posters, what do you think?
Tai is obviously better win than Tibura or corps of Arliovsky, why exactly this win provoked the butthurt from Asp retarded dick sitters. More interesting are Aspinall losses, maybe its objective to give him -1 for Blaydes? But his first terrible loss... Man, even if we give him -1 for Blaydes and +1 for Gane for Tai its draw at least. And if I include his first loss even at -1 (more objective -3)- its a round.

 

[Gregoire1]

Hmm... and review of one's bias by someone who who has a clear bias towards Jones and immediately jumped on the dick of aspinal. Yet here you are complaining about bias. Stfu

Yep, its one of most objective fanboys here (and some others in this thread) and he clearly dont have bias against J... (oh, I cant write his name - it would be butthurt), towards Asp I want to say

 

[mkess101]

Hmm... and review of one's bias by someone who who has a clear bias towards Jones and immediately jumped on the dick of aspinal. Yet here you are complaining about bias. Stfu

The difference is, I can be objective you window licker. TS can't. Of course you come in here talking about Jones because you're madly in love with him. Nobody mentioned him, go gargle his balls elsewhere.

 

[mkess101]

Yep, its one of most objective fanboys here (and some others in this thread) and he clearly dont have bias against J... (oh, I cant write his name - it would be butthurt), towards Asp I want to say

You've confirmed you're retardation bro. You don't need to drive the point home any further.

 

[RockyLockridge]

Agreed and good point, but that makes OP's post even more pointless, because on top of trying to MMAth, he's not consistent. Plus, in recent memory, the snoozers Spivak and Tybura both beat Tai, yet OP doesn't take that into account.

IMO, He doesn't need to take it into account. When gane beat tuivasa he was on a 5 win streak, when tybura beat tuivasa, he was already on a 3 fight losing streak. The wins are not the same quality. It's just like how paddys win over Tony isn't the same as gaethjes in terms of value.

 

[Gregoire1]

You've confirmed you're retardation bro. You don't need to drive the point home any further.

I think you dont need to separate you from Asp nuthugging, we all see your high IQ, just relax, its simple... Jones is not good fighter, its ok? Asp is GOAT, right? I like your temper now, deeep breath...

 

[mkess101]

I think you dont need to separate you from Asp nuthugging, we all see your high IQ, just relax, its simple... Jones is not good fighter, its ok? Asp is GOAT, right? I like your temper now, deeep breath...

Who ever said Jones isn't good, WTF?

In fact, dum dum...I actually said I'd consider him the GOAT even if he took the Aspinall fight and got smoked. Because he was a LHW almost his whole career and dominated for a long time.

See...I understand objectivity. Something clearly you don't.

 

[Gregoire1]

Pavlovich should be 3 I agree.


but tuivasa is a patently better win than tybura at the time gane got it. That's all.

Pavlo maybe just go down to +1 aslo if Tai go down to +1, given late Pavlo loss to Volk clearly, so I think overall its objective. 3 point its beating Jones, Ngannou, Gane (prior to Jones), peak Stipe or siimilar.

 

[Gregoire1]

Who ever said Jones isn't good, WTF?

In fact, dum dum...I actually said I'd consider him the GOAT even if he took the Aspinall fight and got smoked. Because he was a LHW almost his whole career and dominated for a long time.

See...I understand objectivity. Something clearly you don't.

You dont need to explain your bias, we all see it, relax, Jones will be smoked by gatekeeper Asp, we all agree? Great, you are objective and educated man ( or woman) .