- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 55,921
- Reaction score
- 27,198
Because these two things are totally the same.
A misdemeanor under US law is a misdemeanor.
Because these two things are totally the same.
I don't think you would either.
That was like my point.
The bias is obvious.
While I agree not Trump's wall specifically, sort of defeat's the narrative that the wall doesn't work........Wait, are people actually pretending that the short stretch of wall in Calexico is evidence that Trump is fulfilling his 2,000 mile wall? There was already a barrier in Calexico, and they had already prioritized it's reconstruction since 2009. It's not Trump's wall at all, it's an entirely different thing. From what I've seen, all Trump has done regarding the wall is have some models built for a photoshoot.
Also, regardless of how you feel about illegal immigration, it is pretty sick to celebrate seeing a man fall from a 30 foot wall and break both his legs. What a twisted group of people.
Nah, im just making fun of you. Im not an internet tough guy. On a serious note though, why do you care so much that this dummy broke his legs doing something stupid?
A misdemeanor under US law is a misdemeanor.
You ever watch dumb criminals on YouTube? Wildly popular to watch them fail and get injured.That's an entirely different reaction though. It's one thing to say you don't feel bad for somebody who does something dangerous and gets hurt. It's a completely different thing to laugh and celebrate seeing somebody get seriously hurt. Two completely different mindsets at work there.
While I agree not Trump's wall specifically, sort of defeat's the narrative that the wall doesn't work........
Can we start building that 2K mile stretch now? A ton cheaper than the costs of said illegal immigrants.
Frank Murr isn't nodding in agreement.
I've always had the same opinion on it, which is that a 2,000 mile wall is absurd. Pick the hot spots that really need a wall, and build one (or replace the crappy existing one), like the one in this thread. Increase security in some other areas.
You ever watch dumb criminals on YouTube? Wildly popular to watch them fail and get injured.
That lady that stole the Amazon package then broke her leg was a viral video, celebrated by all.
Except, here we are, posting in a thread, that despite the best conditions, a 30 foot high border wall with a human presence as well as security cameras, people are still trying to cross.
Walls are absurdly inexpensive infrastructure projects. Minimal up keep.It's not that a wall does not help, it's measuring the costs of a wall against it's effectiveness. Would it be effective at all? Of course. Would it be effective enough to cost as many billions of dollars as predicted? That's the debate.
I've always had the same opinion on it, which is that a 2,000 mile wall is absurd. Pick the hot spots that really need a wall, and build one (or replace the crappy existing one), like the one in this thread. Increase security in some other areas.
You ever watch dumb criminals on YouTube? Wildly popular to watch them fail and get injured.
That lady that stole the Amazon package then broke her leg was a viral video, celebrated by all.
There's also different types of crimes. How you feel about those crimes is subjective, I guess. Climbing a border wall does not rank high on my list of despicable crimes to commit. If somebody attempts an armed robbery and gets shot, my reaction is much less sympathetic than a guy (who I know nothing about) breaking both his legs attempting to get into America.
That lady stealing packages, petty theft right?There's also different types of crimes. How you feel about those crimes is subjective, I guess. Climbing a border wall does not rank high on my list of despicable crimes to commit. If somebody attempts an armed robbery and gets shot, my reaction is much less sympathetic than a guy (who I know nothing about) breaking both his legs attempting to get into America.
Walls are absurdly inexpensive infrastructure projects. Minimal up keep.
Illegal immigration costs tax payers 100B a year. A wall will have no such recurring cost. Bill Clinton didn't get any pushback building his wall...
The report, conducted by the Government Accountability Office, found that Customs and Border Protection, the agency responsible for construction of the wall, did not consider the cost of building along each segment of the border, which can vary depending on factors such as topography and land ownership.
The report also found that the agency selected locations for barriers without fully assessing where they were needed to prevent illegal border crossings.
“Without assessing costs, consistent with leading practices for capital decision making, C.B.P. does not have complete information for prioritizing locations to use its resources in the most cost-effective manner,” the report said.
I can agree with this approach . . . but then when the hot spots shift another location we need to be prepared to fix those spots too.