Or you just have no clue how to analyse fighters
that might be it as well.
I'm not a fan of anyone kid. Even if i was, It wouldn't change a damn thing about any of my opinions. I'm interested in the objective truth, not massaging my own biases.
Nate Is extremely underrated and has come and has hit his full potential as a fighter in the last few years. He's akin to NIck at his absolute peak currently. His boxing In particular has Improved leaps and bounds. Something Andre ward and even Amir Khan could attest to. Without at doubt, given his current skillset.. he's probably one of the most underrated fighters I can recall In recent memory. People just enjoy using fights from 5+ years ago to analyse fighters Instead of their most recent form, producing a hilariously inaccurate and short sighted picture typical of sherdog keyboard warrior analysts with zero martial arts experience.
Leave the proper analysis to the people who know what they're doing
Edit: It's also funny the hypocrisy and Irony, as those who genuinely hate Conor tend to be the ones who underrate Nate the most. This forum is full of extremists In thought with no semblance of objectivity