- Joined
- Oct 11, 2011
- Messages
- 2,134
- Reaction score
- 0
Clearly not all the time. Conor is an exception.The UFC gives outpointless immediate rematches all the time. If Conor can get one with Nate Diaz, anyone can get one.
Clearly not all the time. Conor is an exception.The UFC gives outpointless immediate rematches all the time. If Conor can get one with Nate Diaz, anyone can get one.
The UFC gives outpointless immediate rematches all the time. If Conor can get one with Nate Diaz, anyone can get one.
The difference is that it made sense at that point in Ronda's career for her to take a superfight with Cyborg.
Ronda and Cyborg were both seemingly invincible, dominant champions who were destroying their opponents in record time. It made perfect sense for two dominant, seemingly invincible champions to meet in a superfight.
Weird that this has to be explained to so many.Holly said she would fight her.
Dana offers it.
Holly says no.
How is this on DW? lol
Clearly not all the time. Conor is an exception.
The UFC would be HAPPY for her to lose to Cyborg, because a humble marquee fighter they do NOT WANT, as the powers that be prefer their fighters to be egotistical, etc, etc, due to the fact that the USA REWARDS narcissistic behavior.
Dana will do everything to protect Ronda from HH and Cyborg. Of corse he want Tate to fight Ronda next. And with HH vs Cyborg at least he does not worry about one or the other anymore,because he an eliminate one of them.
I don't always agree with what they do but it's pretty clear immediate rematches on the back of zero title defense is very rare. Infact has it ever happened in UFC history? I'm not sure. Maybe a couple of times, if ever.Cain almost got one despite the fact that he only had two title defenses against guys he already beat and held up the divisions for almost two years due to injuries. If he hadn't gotten injuries (again) he would have had a rematch despite the fact that he hasn't won a fight in two years.
On the flip side Aldo didn't get one despite being s dominant champ for years.
The UFC gives out immediate rematches whenever they feel like it. There is no logic or reason to it.
The problem with your logic, for me, is that this wasn't the narrative a few months ago. As I mentioned before when holly said she would love to fight cyborg and respects her etc...the sherdog mocking of ronda was huge "glad we have a real champ now" someone who "isn't scared of cyborg". It's not that you directly that said all off this but people/sherdogians were NOT saying holm had things to prove in her division etc. this rationale is pretty recent in my view.
Holm is mid 30s with who knows how much time left. This fight would be a big money and a big prestige win and I favor holm in the matchup. But again, if I were advising her I would pass at this time as well so let's see who she ends up with as her next opponent as I don't believe it will be Tate
What title fight?Ducking a title fight is really lame.
Rotflmao!
Weird that this has to be explained to so many.
I don't always agree with what they do but it's pretty clear immediate rematches on the back of zero title defense is very rare. Infact has it ever happened in UFC history? I'm not sure. Maybe a couple of times, if ever.
But Holly already fought (& beat) Ronda, what are you talking about?
That's not a title fight. And Conor is a much much bigger name, not that it justifies the match up.Immediate rematches for non title fights when one fighter lost in a decisive, non controversial manner were unheard of but Conor/Diaz 2 is happening.
Also, the Cyborg fight is on the prelims so it wos not be a big money fight.
They had said the same thing about Cyborg.
Exactly and it's hard to blame them if they don't want an immediate rematch.if the UFC wants an immediate rematch, they will book an immediate rematch.
Again there is nothing that suggests Holly would not still be willing to fight Cyborg.The problem with your logic, for me, is that this wasn't the narrative a few months ago. As I mentioned before when holly said she would love to fight cyborg and respects her etc...the sherdog mocking of ronda was huge "glad we have a real champ now" someone who "isn't scared of cyborg". It's not that you directly that said all off this but people/sherdogians were NOT saying holm had things to prove in her division etc. this rationale is pretty recent in my view.
Holm is mid 30s with who knows how much time left. This fight would be a big money and a big prestige win and I favor holm in the matchup. But again, if I were advising her I would pass at this time as well so let's see who she ends up with as her next opponent as I don't believe it will be Tate