- Joined
- Feb 10, 2018
- Messages
- 458
- Reaction score
- 554
hear hearDominated??
It was 2-2 going into the 5th. Fight was razor close.
I hate all this revisionist history
hear hearDominated??
It was 2-2 going into the 5th. Fight was razor close.
I hate all this revisionist history
you couldn't be more wrong.Gane absolutely fucking sucks, and he's going to lose badly.
He'd lose really badly if he tried it. He gets finished in 2 if he tries to strike with gane.You think Aspinall is gonna strike with Gane???
I mean, I'm sure he could but that's not gonna happen.
Frank also had reach advantage, yet couldn't find the mark. I doubt Tom can find the target, especially in the later rounds.
I disagree, it would just make those champs look better.That would suck actually. Having a champion that lost to the last 2 champions would just make the division feel even weaker than it already does.
no he hasn't, He's gone 25 mins multiple times and has won before.Gane has only done 25 minutes once - and lost.


you couldn't be more wrong.
Honestly, I fucking hate this place sometimes. Posts like this make me hate mma fans so much. Thankfully, the promotion doesn't respect mma fans.
He'd lose really badly if he tried it. He gets finished in 2 if he tries to strike with gane.
you couldn't be more wrong.
Honestly, I fucking hate this place sometimes. Posts like this make me hate mma fans so much. Thankfully, the promotion doesn't respect mma fans.
He'd lose really badly if he tried it. He gets finished in 2 if he tries to strike with gane.
Champs that aren’t around anymore. So the current champion is a guy that lost to the last 2, makes the current division seem very weak. Whereas with Aspinall, you at least have the question, you know? He’s not the guy that lost multiple title fights now becoming the champ only because those guys left.I disagree, it would just make those champs look better.
To think the division would feel weaker only because tom never fought the best is a bit offside for me.
It's just such incredibly ridiculous hyperbole.Why? If they're wrong and you're right and you know it, why does it bother you?
It's just such incredibly ridiculous hyperbole.
He's lost to ngannou and jones so he's absolutely terrible.
just like max holloway who lost to Volk and topuria he's abosolutely terrible too right?
is also a fair way to look at it . Gane lost in title fights twice, yes. his fight with francis was very very close and he only lost via one fatal error which is not terrible for a young fighter like gane in his first title fight.He’snot the guy that lost multiple title fights now becomingthe champ only because those guys left.
What, make the 2nd round?Aspinall’s a human highlight reel, but Gane’s slick footwork and technical game might just steal the show.
Picture Gane dancing around Ngannou’s bombs at UFC 270, landing crisp counters and kicks over five rounds—his heavyweight ballet could make Aspinall chase and test that unproven gas tank.
Tom’s has quick KOs over Pavlovich and Blaydes, plus a slick sub on Volkov , but he’s faced no one with Gane’s finesse. Gane was outstriking Volkov 146-106 and TKO’ing Lewis with surgical precision.
Aspinall’s never seen round 3 in 18 fights , while Gane’s gone 25 minutes against Ngannou and Volkov—can Tom keep up if Gane drags him to deep waters?
Seriously, if Gane avoids the early storm, he might outpoint or even finish a gassed Aspinall.
48-47 Gane, you heard it here first folks.
I just read your post after my initial pisstake responseSeriously, if Gane avoids the early storm, he might outpoint or even finish a gassed Aspinall.
Gane certainly isn't terrible but it didn't help your stance that same post of yours added that the guy that keeps knocking people out in under two minutes stands no chance on the feet with Gane though.
You're talking about yourself right?casuals will casual