GSP fought really good guys besides Hardy. GSP just made them look bad.
Hughes, Fitch, Penn, Alves and Koscheck really good at the time he fought them plus he had one of the most impressive roads to the title nobody had to face the likes of Trigg, Sherk, Penn 1 to get a title shot
The guy you responded to hated and exaggerated a bit too much.
But, "at the time"? C'mon...
Matt Hughes is a true antique in modern MMA. If he can't get his TD and be on top of the opponent, he is finished. That was proven a LONG time ago when he fought Jose Pele Landi.
Fitch? Most overrated fighter ever (by Sherdog). What was different about Fitch when GSP beat him and when he got KO'd by Hendricks and dominated by Maia? Please tell me.
Yea, he was supposedly "#2" when he was laying on top of guys like Ben Saunders.
BJ is and was a LW, and not a big one. Whatever achievements he has at WW happened back when nobody was an advanced MMA fighter; BJ was a great top position BJJ BB with very fine boxing.
Alves... ok, so tell me what was different about the Alves that got wrestle F'd by Rick Story than the one that faced GSP?
He got way too much credit for beating the antiquated Hughes and for winning a decision of that kickboxer Koscheck.
Kos? Nice title run. Get's KO'd by Paulo Thiago and loses a decision to Thiago Alves and he's a "perennial contender", go figure.
And you didn't mention him, but let's talk Jake Shields. He was a MW champ. When he enters the UFC he's suddenly a WW, and GSP gets credit for all of Jake's accomplishments at 185? C'mon.
Tell Fabricio Werdum he has to fight at LHW for his next fight, and then I'll brag about the guy who beats his starving ass.
Bad matchmaking created a an idiotic pecking order at WW and I thought as much back then.
But GSP's wins over Hendricks and Condit were excellent. THAT is why GSP is the king.
Not because of his overrated wins earlier on.