- Joined
- Aug 18, 2009
- Messages
- 47,575
- Reaction score
- 21,208
Can we get back to your support for why someone is in a better defensive position being unarmed versus armed? Or your assertion that an unarmed population is less vulnerable to suffering intolerable corruption from its armed government? Either is fine. Thanks.
The first wasn't my position.
The second wasn't your position. I like how you tried to sneak in "corruption from its armed government" as if no one is going to notice you blatantly lying to try and win an internet argument.
Let me guess - not lying about what you wrote is feminine and you making up shit out of the blue is being masculine?