You think like an American. I have no allegiance to the republican party, I have supported dem and republican candidates. I'm always fair. I look at the situation from every angle and use critical thinking to look at the most like likely explanations, Occums razor. Given the transparency of the department thus far I find no reason to believe they would purposely lie about a client list at this time. I find it much more likely that if they wanted the client list to remain private, that they would publicly say that it is being kept private for "insert reasons". They would say we can't release the list, this is why. People would accept that. People just don't want to have the feeling that something is being hidden from them. I feel like trying to hide the "client list" from existing would be counterproductive and unnecessary.
Is it possible that Pam Bondi is lying about the client list, that she meant client list, and that now she is hiding it. It is possible, but I personally find it unlikely. It's so much more likely that she was asked a question about it and answered the question improperly. Why would she say that publicly if the plan was to say it doesn't exist. Do you think she slipped up? All of the logic here just doesn't add up. She clearly knew nothing about the Epstein Files and hadn't looked at it yet. The files are still under review now as I understand, and so at some point there may be a release of information.
