Feds indicted both Epstein and GM so if they were really trying to protect these Epstein associates why would they charge them in the first place? Not to mention after the 2019 indictment they released the names of
four unindicted co-conspirators who were identified in the 2009 Epstein case but whose names were not released as part of the plea deal in that case. The issue is those co-conspirators are merely women who worked for Epstein and not a salacious list of celebrities so CTers like you don't care. It shows that its not about justice because if it was you'd be calling for a closer look into Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff, Adriana Ross and Nada Marcinkova. But think about it, if they're seemingly struggling to build a case against these four women who were named by Epstein victims as accomplices how are they going to charge these supposed clients? You understand that building a case that would lead to a conviction requires more than merely gathering enough evidence to convince CTers right?
This is a good example of the sleight of hand that CTers use. You say "they" here but the law you're referring to was a New York state law, not a federal one, so it had nothing to do with the Biden admin. But those whose minds are infected by conspiracies see a collective "they" behind these supposed schemes.
If anything its insane to believe that the Biden DOJ would leak sensitive evidence about that case. If there was enough evidence to indict him they would've done that and if not then they wouldn't release the evidence because that's wildly irresponsible and would leave the government open to being sued. Trump was already being investigated for his actual crimes like trying to steal the 2020 election, a real conspiracy that CTers ignored.
Or maybe, just maybe...there is no list? After all, what would stop them from just releasing heavily redacted versions of these documents that protect their interests while implicating their enemies?
