International Disunited Kingdom: The Renewed Call For Scottish Independence, Part 2.

Scotland is a fiscally irresponsible nation, if they break from the UK they will be on economic life support within months.

9/10 Scotmen are an economic recipient, that means they take more from the system than they put in. The UK funds Scotland and all their BS socialist programs.

I for one hope they leave. However the UK should maintain aberdeen and the surrounding regions, they vote tory and cannot be left to the madness of the hard left SNP.
 
Scotland is a fiscally irresponsible nation, if they break from the UK they will be on economic life support within months.

9/10 Scotmen are an economic recipient, that means they take more from the system than they put in. The UK funds Scotland and all their BS socialist programs.

I for one hope they leave. However the UK should maintain aberdeen and the surrounding regions, they vote tory and cannot be left to the madness of the hard left SNP.
so fiscally irresponsible its never had a trade deficit in my lifetime... and the rest of your post is just nonsense. typical white belt stuff
 
Never had a trade deficit? Do you understand what fiscal discipline is.

Scotland has a budget deficit, so great that even the EU would not allow it membership to the EU if it acted as an independent state.

Scotland has the highest budget deficit of Europe, it's economy is overly dependant on oil, which they will not keep in the event of a positive independence referendum.

Its revenues are just over £300 per head lower than for the UK while its spending is more than £1,500 per head higher.

Another thick jock eviscerated.
 
Last edited:
we'll just bomb all the kiddie brothels the royals frequent... there goes Englands main export

Calm down Braveheart they're your Royals too , so perhaps don't bomb all the brothels as some of em are probably in Scotland .
 
We won't we'll just bomb you right back , starting with high value targets like chip shops , heroin dealers and the Krankies .

To be fair the Scots and English are better banding together to get rid of all the bought out politicians and their masters leeching off our system. Your average English or Scottish person have a lot more in common than we do with any of the politicias.
 
Scotland is a fiscally irresponsible nation, if they break from the UK they will be on economic life support within months.

9/10 Scotmen are an economic recipient, that means they take more from the system than they put in. The UK funds Scotland and all their BS socialist programs.

I for one hope they leave. However the UK should maintain aberdeen and the surrounding regions, they vote tory and cannot be left to the madness of the hard left SNP.

These statements have no basis in fact, which will be proven by no facts ever being given to this effect.
 
Never had a trade deficit? Do you understand what fiscal discipline is.

Scotland has a budget deficit, so great that even the EU would not allow it membership to the EU if it acted as an independent state.

Scotland has the highest budget deficit of Europe, it's economy is overly dependant on oil, which they will not keep in the event of a positive independence referendum.

Its revenues are just over £300 per head lower than for the UK while its spending is more than £1,500 per head higher.

Another thick jock eviscerated.

No you just didn't understand what you read when you posted GERS, you saw a sophist headline somewhere and that is the entirety of your knowledge on the subject. Like a virus you spread and replicate bad information.

The GERS data is ludicrous: Scotland does not generate 60% of the UK’s net fiscal deficit

What GERS is asking us to believe is that with 8.2% of the UK population Scotland created between 54% and 60% of the UK deficit last year, depending on the basis used.

And because the GERS methodology is wrong when comparing income and expenditure, as I have already noted today.

But most of all it is because what this ignores is three issues. The first is that there is a massive bias in financial services in the UK that the Tax Justice Network has recently pointed out. This means value is extracted from Scotland and recorded in London.

And my answer is very simple: no it did not.


https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog...ot-generate-60-of-the-uks-net-fiscal-deficit/

The GERS headline was fact checked all over the place above is an example.
 
The problem we have is folk due to their prejudices just accept information without challenge then start repeating it. So we have some cretin who thinks of Scots as "jocks" sees a headline about how the "jocks" are spending all the money, accepts it at face-value cause they think of scots as "jocks" and then just pass it on.

Now of course you can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into ... so we're left with the above mess.

It's easy to lie to dumbfucks and since liars can tell you what whatever they want, dumbfucks always cite liars cause they're just being told what they want to hear.
 
did you just share GERS as evidence of something? if so, slap yourself!



oh and we cant have a deficit and balance the budget every year... any deficit is the responsibility of the UK government. So slap yourself again


You can get angry all you want. It doesn't change facts.
 
To be fair the Scots and English are better banding together to get rid of all the bought out politicians and their masters leeching off our system. Your average English or Scottish person have a lot more in common than we do with any of the politicias.
I've got nothing in common with a scotsman, they are human filth, insects, sub-humans.

We want you gone, but you're not having Aberdeen.
 
No you just didn't understand what you read when you posted GERS, you saw a sophist headline somewhere and that is the entirety of your knowledge on the subject. Like a virus you spread and replicate bad information.

The GERS data is ludicrous: Scotland does not generate 60% of the UK’s net fiscal deficit

What GERS is asking us to believe is that with 8.2% of the UK population Scotland created between 54% and 60% of the UK deficit last year, depending on the basis used.

And because the GERS methodology is wrong when comparing income and expenditure, as I have already noted today.

But most of all it is because what this ignores is three issues. The first is that there is a massive bias in financial services in the UK that the Tax Justice Network has recently pointed out. This means value is extracted from Scotland and recorded in London.

And my answer is very simple: no it did not.


https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog...ot-generate-60-of-the-uks-net-fiscal-deficit/

The GERS headline was fact checked all over the place above is an example.

WTF are you on about, I didn't say anything about Scotland making 60% of the UK deficit.

If you were an independent country you would have one of the highest deficits of all European nations. Scotland is a basket case and is funded by England. The Barnett formula has got to go.
 
Calm down Braveheart they're your Royals too , so perhaps don't bomb all the brothels as some of em are probably in Scotland .
last I checked her title was "Queen of England" and Im a republican, so unlucky there son... everyone knows its England with the kiddie fiddler problem(Jimmy Savile ring a bell?)
 
Never had a trade deficit? Do you understand what fiscal discipline is.

Scotland has a budget deficit, so great that even the EU would not allow it membership to the EU if it acted as an independent state.

Scotland has the highest budget deficit of Europe, it's economy is overly dependant on oil, which they will not keep in the event of a positive independence referendum.

Its revenues are just over £300 per head lower than for the UK while its spending is more than £1,500 per head higher.

Another thick jock eviscerated.
are you incapable of quoting? if you want to respond give it a try next time.

We dont have a deficit, any deficit is the responsibility of the UK government. Thanks for playing
No you just didn't understand what you read when you posted GERS, you saw a sophist headline somewhere and that is the entirety of your knowledge on the subject. Like a virus you spread and replicate bad information.

The GERS data is ludicrous: Scotland does not generate 60% of the UK’s net fiscal deficit

What GERS is asking us to believe is that with 8.2% of the UK population Scotland created between 54% and 60% of the UK deficit last year, depending on the basis used.

And because the GERS methodology is wrong when comparing income and expenditure, as I have already noted today.

But most of all it is because what this ignores is three issues. The first is that there is a massive bias in financial services in the UK that the Tax Justice Network has recently pointed out. This means value is extracted from Scotland and recorded in London.

And my answer is very simple: no it did not.


https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog...ot-generate-60-of-the-uks-net-fiscal-deficit/

The GERS headline was fact checked all over the place above is an example.
this guy gets it
 
last I checked her title was "Queen of England" and Im a republican, so unlucky there son... everyone knows its England with the kiddie fiddler problem(Jimmy Savile ring a bell?)

Well hurrah for you and all your Republican chums but perhaps try checking again as her title is Queen Elizabeth the second by the grace of God of the United Kingdom yadayadayada , I'm sure the victims of Pedos at Celtic boys club will be glad to learn that kiddie fiddling is an English thing .
 
Well hurrah for you and all your Republican chums but perhaps try checking again as her title is Queen Elizabeth the second by the grace of God of the United Kingdom yadayadayada , I'm sure the victims of Pedos at Celtic boys club will be glad to learn that kiddie fiddling is an English thing .
Doesnt change the fact that they are all English, so own them ffs ya melt.. Also if youre comparing Jimmy Saviles crimes to anything at Celtic then you are even more dense than I thought.

kiddie fiddling isnt an England only problem... its just you weirdos made it a national sport
 
Sturgeon demands independence referendum powers be devolved
Scotland’s first minister writes formally to Johnson, saying there is an ‘unarguable mandate’
By Libby Brooks | 19 Dec 2019​



Nicola Sturgeon has called for the Scottish parliament to be given permanent powers to hold subsequent referendums on independence from the UK.

Describing the SNP’s success in last week’s general election as an “unarguable mandate by any normal standard of democracy”, Scotland’s first minister confirmed on Thursday morning that she had formally written to Boris Johnson to request the powers to legally stage another referendum under section 30 of the 1998 Scotland Act.

Alongside this, the SNP leader published a 38-page document that also sets out draft amendments to the statute, which would devolve the right to hold votes on leaving the UK to Holyrood.

Insisting that she was not advocating for a third independence referendum – “not least because I think when Scotland gets the chance to vote again, it will vote for independence” – she refused to rule one out for ever, underlining that no first minister could bind the hands of their successors over the right to self-determination.

Entitled Scotland’s Right to Choose, the publication argues that there has been a “material change of circumstance” since the independence referendum of 2014, based on “the prospect of Scotland leaving the EU against its will and what EU exit has revealed about Scotland’s position within the UK”.

Launching the document at an event at her official residence of Bute House in Edinburgh, Sturgeon said she “fully expected to get a flat no” from Westminster initially.

“I’m going to stand my ground. I fully expect today we will get the flat no of Westminster opposition, but that will not be the end of the matter and Boris Johnson should not be under any illusion that it is.”

Johnson will use the Queen’s speech on Thursday to confirm that a second independence referendum next year would be a “damaging distraction”, while setting out investment in the Scottish economy.

Describing the Tory strategy as “self-defeating”, Sturgeon insisted that continued refusal to allow the Scottish people their right to choose would only boost support for independence.

She added: “I am not simply firing off a letter to Boris Johnson; I am publishing a detailed and considered case.” She said that when she spoke to Johnson immediately after the election results, he had committed to engaging seriously with the proposals.

Since securing 47 of Scotland’s 59 Westminster seats with an increased vote share of 45% last Thursday, Sturgeon has described the general election as a “watershed moment” and declared that the country could not be “imprisoned in the UK against its will”.

But, despite Westminster’s chaotic handling of Brexit and Johnson’s unpopularity among Scottish voters, the expected long-term boost to support for independence has not materialised, with polls showing support averaging at around 48%.

On Thursday afternoon, a separate bill setting out how referendums in Scotland will be run was voted through its final stage at Holyrood. But this framework bill does not set the date or the question on the ballot, which have to be specified in further primary legislation.

Much of the afternoon’s debate centred around whether a previous referendum question – such as the yes/no format of 2014, which critics argued favoured the affirmative side – has to be reassessed by the Electoral Commission if it is being asked again within two parliamentary terms. In the end, a compromise was reached, which allows MSPs to vote to consult the commission regardless of timing, but which could in reality be blocked by a pro-independence majority.

The Electoral Commission confirmed on Monday that the bill had accepted its recommendation of a minimum 10-week campaign period. Added to the required 26-week lead-in period, that would mean a referendum would need nine months from the passing of legislation in Holyrood to polling day, making the chance of one in 2020 highly unlikely.

https://amp.theguardian.com/politic...rgeon-requests-independence-referendum-powers
 
Doesnt change the fact that they are all English, so own them ffs ya melt.. Also if youre comparing Jimmy Saviles crimes to anything at Celtic then you are even more dense than I thought.

kiddie fiddling isnt an England only problem... its just you weirdos made it a national sport

So you were wrong , accept it and move on mate .
 
are you incapable of quoting? if you want to respond give it a try next time.

We dont have a deficit, any deficit is the responsibility of the UK government. Thanks for playing

this guy gets it
I know how to quote, for some reason it was disabled for soemtime yesterday.

If yyou feel so confident, go it alone without the UK. I want a good laugh when you're a failed state.
 
I know how to quote, for some reason it was disabled for soemtime yesterday.

If yyou feel so confident, go it alone without the UK. I want a good laugh when you're a failed state.
we are trying but you clingy fucks are tough to shake loose
 
Back
Top