- Joined
- Sep 1, 2005
- Messages
- 24,379
- Reaction score
- 3,475
Gee who could have foreseen this post coming? Who pays your bills?The guy was most likely a gang banger of some sort who was shot for an unrelated matter.
Gee who could have foreseen this post coming? Who pays your bills?The guy was most likely a gang banger of some sort who was shot for an unrelated matter.
Gee who could have foreseen this post coming? Who pays your bills?
I'm reading everywhere A lot of people jumping on all kinds of conspiracy theories already. You're telling me you looked up that article but you're unaware of the theories?What conspiracy theory? This post bemused me, it's like a pre-prepared statement released at the wrong time.
And somehow this excuses the women coming into a guys apartment and killing him?
Shot in the mouth according to the attorney that was posted earlier as being involved in the main case.
The attorney retracted what he said about getting shot in the mouth. Now he is saying he was shot in the side/back.
Lol @ wearing a dragon ball z shirt in a court of law (or anywhere for that matter).
I'm reading everywhere A lot of people jumping on all kinds of conspiracy theories already. You're telling me you looked up that article but you're unaware of the theories?
dont courts have a dress code anymore? this guy could have at least worn a collared shirt and a nice set of paints
in my defense you've alluded to her getting her license suspended, which I haven't read anywhere including the article that you posted.I looked it up after i made my post. I had seen it in passing (as stated in the original post) but hadn't seen it on a news site (i saw it scrolling down front page of reddit last night) so i googled the terms and saw the ABC post and posted it. That's the extent of my interaction with this specific subject.
You on the other hand have been reading "everywhere" about conspiracies and projected that onto me. It now makes sense why your post was going on about conspiracy theories.
The old telephone game it's no wonder that half the country or greater is ignorant as FUCK.I read somewhere that someone in the jury fell asleep & is getting 10yrs. this true??
The old telephone game it's no wonder that half the country or greater is ignorant as FUCK.
![]()
dont courts have a dress code anymore? this guy could have at least worn a collared shirt and a nice set of paints
The old telephone game it's no wonder that half the country or greater is ignorant as FUCK.
![]()
And somehow this excuses the women coming into a guys apartment and killing him?
Yeah man.right..which is why I asked if it was true or not. don't remember that being a part of the "old telephone" game. but you're spot on with your assertion, making assumptions & all.
it turns out that it was someone else entirely in Florida who was sentenced 10 days for oversleeping/missing a trial date. something along those lines.
Or maybe not.Aka fake news
You might want to go back and actually read the article. It said she'd been fired and her credentials blacklisted. Please don't try to argue that's not the same as having your license suspended.in my defense you've alluded to her getting her license suspended, which I haven't read anywhere including the article that you posted.
You then eluded to her contradicting the police report so with all of the conspiracy theories running amok it's not that far-fetched to finish two + two.
I'll go back and read again but again nothing led me to believe that her license was suspended.Or maybe not.
You might want to go back and actually read the article. It said she'd been fired and her credentials blacklisted. Please don't try to argue that's not the same as having your license suspended.
Homie don't play dat, as it were.
As for testimony, the article claimed she testified she thought she heard Guyger making a personal call and someone saying something that contradict the defense account. Now, whether or not that's what she actually testified is again a different question, and don't bother, unless you want to produce her testimony and falsify their claim.
Killing someone after they testify seems pointless. How often does this happen?