- Joined
- Mar 19, 2016
- Messages
- 2,895
- Reaction score
- 166
They might have bigger names but they weren't better. MM is small and wasn't on the same level as his flyweight run, he improved a lot even from the Ian McCall fights. Cruz fought him way before that.It's not even close.
Tj may be more skilled, but as far as resume goes there is no way you can give it to TJ over Cruz.
MM, Faber and TJ are miles better than any TJ win. One is one of the best fighters ever, who even tho he is smaller was still an elite BW, one is a legend who paved the way for the smaller divisions and was always a staple in the top 10, and the third is TJ himself who Cruz beat when he was already past his prime and clearly not 100% after all of the injuries.
TJ's best wins are Cody, who is a flash in the pan and whose only great win on his record is an old past his prime Cruz, Barao who was severely overhyped because he ruled over a weak division while Cruz was injured, and assuncao who is a great fighter but never has been championship material even tho he is always a contender.
MM, Faber, and TJ > garbrandt, barao, and assuncao. No matter which way you look at it.
Faber wasn't ever better than Barao, Cody or Assuncao and the last time they fought he was old and had no business fighting for the title.
And the TJ fight was a controversial split decision. All of TJ's wins are dominant. Cody, Barao and Assuncao especially when and how he beat them are way better than Faber and MM wins. Barao was on top of a better division than its state before Cruz was injured. There was more depth and more exposure.
Is beating Robert Whittaker 4 years ago as good of a win as beating him now? Surely not. So bringing up the MM fight is ridiculous.