No one thinks it's the Apocalypse. This isn't the plague. It's not going to wipe out half of Europe. It IS going to bring health care systems in a lot of countries to their knees. Things are going to get ugly. If you think things are roses and sunshine in Italy right now, you're just plain deluded. And 3 weeks ago Italy was where North America is now.
I explained in my post that’s a wildly off figure, fatality rate cannot be determined during an outbreak so easily. The only numbers remotely accurate are confirmed infections and confirmed deaths. I did a calculation with cross reference to H1N1, and concluded that the virus might have an overall infection to death ratio of 0.03% when you take into account the unreported cases.H1N1 WAS a legit pandemic. It happened to have a 0.02% mortality rate. That's 1 in 5000 infected.
Coronavirus is also a Pandemic. It has a mortality rate around 2% (possibly as much as 3.4%). That's 1 out of every 50 infected.
So what happens if Coronavirus reaches the same infection levels as H1N1 (which seems entirely possible)?
H1N1 WAS a legit pandemic. It happened to have a 0.02% mortality rate. That's 1 in 5000 infected.
Coronavirus is also a Pandemic. It has a mortality rate around 2% (possibly as much as 3.4%). That's 1 out of every 50 infected.
So what happens if Coronavirus reaches the same infection levels as H1N1 (which seems entirely possible)?
I hope you don't get it.I hope I don't get it.
Adding some context:H1N1 WAS a legit pandemic. It happened to have a 0.02% mortality rate. That's 1 in 5000 infected.
Coronavirus is also a Pandemic. It has a mortality rate around 2% (possibly as much as 3.4%). That's 1 out of every 50 infected.
So what happens if Coronavirus reaches the same infection levels as H1N1 (which seems entirely possible)?

You're contradicting yourself and fudging your own numbers to arrive at the conclusion you want.I explained in my post that’s a wildly off figure, fatality rate cannot be determined during an outbreak so easily. The only numbers remotely accurate are confirmed infections and confirmed deaths. I did a calculation with cross reference to H1N1, and concluded that the virus might have an overall infection to death ratio of 0.03% when you take into account the unreported cases.
H1N1 had up to 20% fatality rate during the breakout phase, which amounted to nothing. It was a wildly underperforming flu, that killed only 12K Americans in one year. That’s considered one of the least deadly flu’s ever.
2019 numbers here: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/preliminary-in-season-estimates.htm
People dont even blink about a 30K death toll by flu, and nobody is even tested for flu. It’s presumed.
The recovery rate of coronavirus is extremely high and getting higher each day.
Don't go. 6 suspected cases are currently there due to some guy from Italy. Due to the lack of prope testing facility, samples were sent out and are not expected back for a week.
Money ain't gonna help bro. People will be raiding farmers and preppers and people with freezers filled of deer meat. I'm good bro I got my trusty sigp239 and will head to my parents remote property with my fam where two rotties and a case of rifles will keep us safe
What numbers am I fudging? I’m curious to see what’s wrong with my analysis. You can provide me the numbers if you want, anything, and I’ll break them down.You're contradicting yourself and fudging your own numbers to arrive at the conclusion you want.
Fauci, our own CDC director, testified today that the fatality rate for the normal flu (he wasn't specific) is 0.1%, and that the Coronavirus is at least 10x as high as that, which would put it at 1.0%, but I presume he calculates the latter figure by US deaths or those in first world countries; because globally it's ~37x as that rate just going off the John Hopkins map for confirmed deaths versus confirmed cases (3.67% currently). Meanwhile, it's spreading similar to the flu, but unlike the flu, as Fauci (or another health director) had to explain to Trump in one of those critical meetings, there is no vaccine for COVID-19, and we won't be able to produce a viable vaccine for at least a year. This has been Trump's only meaningful misstep so far. He really seemed to believe we would be able to vaccinate it. Fortunately, he was convinced in that meeting, and changed course with the strategy to fight it.
I've been getting updates from the homeland.Fuck
4000 dead, and 68000 recovered.The 3.67% figure isn't an estimate. It's derived from the confirmed cases versus the confirmed deaths from those cases. I'm just going off the JH map. All sources aren't in 100% agreement, and we're not dealing with numbers where small mistakes would extrapolate to major statistical flaws when estimating the wider impact. This isn't 9 deaths, we're talking about, here, it's over 4,000:
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6
I'm in the Least Concern camp, but your attempt to downplay this outbreak, or analogize it to Swine Flu (like the Avian Bird Flu a decade earlier) is misguided. We're well past phantom panic.
Yes TYT but I pretty much explain the key points in my post.
She is right you know and she should point out that fact given the dangers of coronavirus already death in the US by someone who has contracted the virus. There has been children as young as 45 days who have died from the virus and we have actual cases appearing across the Country in more and more states at a rapid rise. We need people who have dealt with actual dangerous viruses such as Ebola and SARS. I think many Republicans think the same way but are afraid of making their opinions known and recent comments by President Trump leads me to believe he may have a change of heart by the end of the week.
Edit Point too I like Pence but he is not the man for the job. I don't think by his reactions he really wanted to be in charge of this effort because the damage is already happening.