- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Messages
- 20,528
- Reaction score
- 2
Sherk and Franca. That result stood, but I'm not sure how the rules go about it.
That was it, thanks.
Sherk and Franca. That result stood, but I'm not sure how the rules go about it.
Wouldn't surprise me if he was on something but I would believe that someone of Cormier's age and body type had low T than Jones' would.
Hope they do a CIR on both samples in question.
Not at 35 years old. A ratio of .4 is abnormally low. It would be considered low for an average male and very low for a professional athlete like Cormier. You would expect him to have over a 1:1 ratio. The Nevada Athletic Commission doesn't consider it to be abnormally high (i.e. an indication of performance enhancing) unless its over 6:1. I would not be surprised if Cormier had recently cycling off PEDs around the time of the .4 test. It's hard to say though because there are so many variables involved.
nope just to be fair since everyone is examining jones' tests, we should do the same to dc.
Go fuck yourself.Can we swear in here ? Apology if no
https://www.dshs-koeln.de/fileadmin/redaktion/Institute/Biochemie/PDF/Literatur_ID825.pdf Check this out - tables with average readings for individual normal students and tour de france cyclists and rowers 25 years ago. Maybe the later two groups were doped up but I doubt the students were and one dude has ratios of .12 and another of .22.Is there any scientific paper on average ratio levels?
Can we swear in here ? Apology if no