etc etc etc
I'd call it a draw really, there was no winner in that fight. It was an abortion thanks to Condit. And you're oversensitive if you think criticizing the way the guy 'fought' is fighter bashing.
lol. Diaz had 23 minutes to do something on the feet!
Yes Condit played stick and move and outworked him, but then Nick took his back in the 5th! And Condit swept and ended up on top
Don't know what else to say :icon_neut
You and about 5% of the other people who watched the fight. But hey, everyone is entitled to a their opinion as irrational as it may seem.
I'd call it a draw really, there was no winner in that fight. It was an abortion thanks to Condit. And you're oversensitive if you think criticizing the way the guy 'fought' is fighter bashing.
Anderson, Chuck, Lindland, Miletich, a bunch of others thought Diaz won. It's one of the most controversial fights in UFC history. It's cool if you disagree with me, but let's not pretend Condit put on a clinic, it was a close fight. He rolled the dice with a gameplan that exploited the time limit. Not why a lot of people watch MMA. (or compete in it)
Condits needs to just keep running
Already posted in another thread bro. But misleading misquote in the title.
Make sure you tell that to Anderson and Chuck. I'm sure they will bow to your wisdom.
Continuously posting stupid ass gifs about running gets old. When you do it over and over, yeah it's coming close to fighter bashing IMO. But whatever, it's not like Condit rarely wins by decision, so we can just pretend he's a point fighter.
he tagged Diaz with all 8 limbs but Diaz just kept coming forward thanks to his granite chin
I must have missed the memo when they were the judges of the fight.
Fighters have all kinds of opinions and yet they aren't trained as judges.
Face it you're just being stubborn because you can't face the fact that your boy got beat. It's pretty simple. Condit didn't dominate that fight but he took Nick out of his game and clearly beat him.
Calling that pointfighting is an insult to pointfighters. It was shameless time limit exploitation. It's not like he was Machida, clowning Tito from the outside or something. He ate a bunch of shots to give a bunch of weak ones, rolled the dice with the judges, instead of going in there to stop Diaz. He never fought that way before. But hey, it's cool if you liked what he did. I thought it was horrible, and I was a fan before.
I'd call it a draw really, there was no winner in that fight. It was an abortion thanks to Condit. And you're oversensitive if you think criticizing the way the guy 'fought' is fighter bashing.
And yet your still a fan of Diaz even though he didn't have the fight IQ to adjust to what Condit was doing, whined like a baby about the decision, stomped his feet and retired cause he didn't wanna play anymore.
I must have missed the memo where I'm supposed to care what the judges think.
Neither are you. Neither am I. Nor does it matter. Great point you got there.
If Nick got beat I'd be fine with it. I was a fan of both going in. Condit didn't even try to beat him. Hence my (and many others') opinion. It's cool if you disagree.