- Joined
- Jun 26, 2012
- Messages
- 32,591
- Reaction score
- 46,355
You think that? Her history is flip flopping on issues to whatever she thinks will get her attention. After falling off from Daily Wire she's been desperate for any attention to try and get views again for herself, going so far as to start campaigning that Harvey Weinstein is innocent.there's no issue of defamation as Candice obviously believes what she's saying.
I don't think she believes it, this is just a weird copy of the michelle obama thing since she knows that got a lot of attention. So defamation would definitely apply, although the problem would be to show any harms from being essentially verbally abused. I supposed if a nutty Owens supporter called in a death threat to Macron, something like that could show a harm? Not sure.