- Joined
- Apr 20, 2017
- Messages
- 4,893
- Reaction score
- 1,322
thank you for making me feel youngCrazy he’s only 41
thank you for making me feel youngCrazy he’s only 41
As a casualty investigator, for 35 years, who has built court cases for a living, likely longer than you've been alive, — it's not "an argument" — it's evidence.
I'm convinced by the scenario. Pavlovich was helpless, when pressured by a better man.
That same "better man" who was similarly pressured and destroyed by Stipe, in almost exactly the same way.
Insane? <45>
It is exactly the opposite: it is insane to give Pavlovich "too much credit" ... when he folded like a $3 lawn chair, the moment he got pressured by a bigger/stronger man ... who himself folded like a $3 lawn chair, the moment he got pressured and pushed by Stipe.
Pavlovich has beaten absolutely nobody of note. (Just fat, overweight cans.)
Denial ≠ Rebuttal
I have been a casualty investigator since 1988, so since you're 42, that's been since you were a snot-nosed 5-year-old.
By the same token, I really don't need "your opinion" on my opinion <45>
To address your curiosity, it's because I'm a fight fan.
And as such, I am unconvinced by Sergei Pavlovich, for the exact reasons stated above.
If you're convinced, fine.
I am not.
My brother in Christ <45>
My thoughts are the opposite ... Pavlovich has looked good facing "weak prey animals" ... and shit all over himself and failed when facing a predator in Overeem. (Watch the video again.)
Made especially funny, because Overeem was a "prey animal" when in the same cage with Stipe.
Maybe MMA math doesn't work sometimes — but a lot of times it does
Jesus that Gif. Dude karate chopped him all the way to his trial...
Anyone who knocks anyone because they lost to Overeem is insane.
Too much was made of that loss. It was his first big fight in a big promotion vs an elite level and very experienced HW. Critics still knock him for that loss which is ridiculous.
Jesus that Gif. Dude karate chopped him all the way to his trial...
View attachment 1005620
Former champ Cain Velasquez offered high praise for Ultimate Fighting Championship heavyweight standout Sergei Pavlovich.
Pavlovich (18-1) and fellow contender Tom Aspinall are widely regarded as part of the next generation to potentially rule over the UFC’s heavyweight division. Recently asked about his opinion on the division, Velasquez hailed Aspinall and especially Pavlovich as future champ prospects.
Velasquez also revealed that he had trained with Pavlovich at American Kickboxing Academy several years ago. The former champ noted that while he still acquits himself well in training, Pavlovich was one of the few he found “difficult” to deal with. He also lauded the wrestling skills of Pavlovich, who is currently on a six-fight first-round KO streak. The 41-year-old recently told The Schmo:
Continue Reading
https://www.sherdog.com/news/news/C...-Notes-He-Is-Really-Tough-to-Deal-With-191339
I have been a casualty investigator since 1988, so since you're 42, that's been since you were a snot-nosed 5-year-old.
By the same token, I really don't need "your opinion" on my opinion <45>
To address your curiosity, it's because I'm a fight fan.
And as such, I am unconvinced by Sergei Pavlovich, for the exact reasons stated above.
If you're convinced, fine.
I am not.
While it's true that it was a big step up in competition, plenty of fighters get that first big fight and actually perform, proving they belong. Pavlovich is obviously bouncing back from the loss just fine, but when you're at the UFC level, "give him a break, it's just nerves and better opponents" doesn't really fly anymore.
how is Blaydes a can? he's been in the top 5-10 practically since he got to the UFC.As a casualty investigator, for 35 years, who has built court cases for a living, likely longer than you've been alive, — it's not "an argument" — it's evidence.
I'm convinced by the scenario. Pavlovich was helpless, when pressured by a better man.
That same "better man" who was similarly pressured and destroyed by Stipe, in almost exactly the same way.
Insane? <45>
It is exactly the opposite: it is insane to give Pavlovich "too much credit" ... when he folded like a $3 lawn chair, the moment he got pressured by a bigger/stronger man ... who himself folded like a $3 lawn chair, the moment he got pressured and pushed by Stipe.
Pavlovich has beaten absolutely nobody of note. (Just fat, overweight cans.)
Denial ≠ Rebuttal
That's alright, bro, we get the idea. I'm actually kinda sold on Sergei and Aspinall, I like both of them and would love to see a fight between the two. Most here seem to think Jones will retire after Stipe fight, so those two could def be a title fight.Sorry... couldn't really think of a poll question.