• We are currently experiencing technical difficulties. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

Barr and Mueller's Two Testie-fy (SCO v. 34)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Except Quipling (the TS) hasn't done anything deserving of ridicule. He's been on-point throughout this saga, a very good contributor no matter if you agree with him or not.

Plus he's kinda cute
 
I'm sure the Republicans in Congress will be going after Barr for lying with the same veracity they went after Cohen for lying. Since it's pretty clear that either Barr is completely incompetent, or that he lied with his response.

Personally, I am waiting for Rep. Paul Gosar DDS' trenchant body language analysis during that hearing.

th
 
Wow. This is huge news. The guy who wrote the report is saying that Barr's summary is absolute BS. Looks like Trump is super guilty and had one of his cronies spreading fake news for him. No surprise. Right wingers are the kings of fake news
 
It's not his determination to make. He'll go down in history as a lawless piece of shit, just like this "President".

lol yes it is.

Even if Mueller recommended charging the president, he's not the final authority on that. Barr was not recused.

You are delusional. You don't know what you're talking about.
 
LOL. Even Mueller says that Barr mischaracterized his report.

Mueller is a moron and apparently a chicken shit too. You're delusional. Mueller stands by his no collusion statement. He also stands by not recommending obstruction charges (even if he did it doesn't meet the standard anyway since there is no underlying crime).

Mueller was complaining that Barr didn't characterize the mood of the team properly. He's a chicken shit who didn't have the guts to recommend charges on the president so now he's bitching and whining.

Keep crying lol.
 
Wow. This is huge news. The guy who wrote the report is saying that Barr's summary is absolute BS. Looks like Trump is super guilty and had one of his cronies spreading fake news for him. No surprise. Right wingers are the kings of fake news

lol no.

That's not what Mueller said. You guys are deranged. What's wrong with all of you? He stands by no collusion.
 
giphy.gif


Number 34? It's like you people like it or something.
 
Every day with you hard right guys is the same.

Morning - Spend morning obfuscating how your series of nonsensical claims about x didn't pan out.

Afternoon - Repeat procedure from morning

Night - Spam shitty memes and some idiot's twitter feed expressing the next day's failed bombshell
 
lol no.

That's not what Mueller said. You guys are deranged. What's wrong with all of you? He stands by no collusion.

Pray tell, what exactly did Mueller say? And please, don't bother if you can't refrain from pigheaded nonsense like "Bro, he said no collusion!!"
 
I couldn’t help but notice that,

“the last word has been spoken by Barr, and all that’s left is liberal bitching”


Was missing from the OP. Meh, whatever, you girls will figure it out eventually.


<{hughesimpress}>
 
Every day with you hard right guys is the same.

Morning - Spend morning obfuscating how your series of nonsensical claims about x didn't pan out.

Afternoon - Repeat procedure from morning

Night - Spam shitty memes and some idiot's twitter feed expressing the next day's failed bombshell



Are you insane?


The right on sherdog has been entirely correct from day one.


Let’s have a quick reality check, shall we?


Things the left thought would happen.

1 - Trump would be indicted, some thought he would be dragged from the White House in handcuffs. FALSE

2 - Trump Jr would be indicted. FALSE

3 - Kushner would be indicted. FALSE

4 - Charges of conspiracy would be brought against anyone on the trump campaign. FALSE

5 - Avinatti, Stormy, Cohen, Schiff, Comey, and any of the other cast of characters would surely be the one to take down trump. FALSE

6 - Trump would be impeached. FALSE

7 - Trump would be charged with obstruction. FALSE





Add about 50 more embarrassing predictions liberals here had to that list, and we won’t have even begun to scratch the surface of the unprecedented embarrassment you’ve brought upon yourselves.



<WellThere>



PS, Homer still believes all that shit will happen. Seth on Twitter told him so.
 
Last edited:
lol no.

That's not what Mueller said. You guys are deranged. What's wrong with all of you? He stands by no collusion.


Just FYI, War is a troll account. He rack a da suddlety sometimes.
 
Well said. There's a place out there where we have an armored vehicle literally running over people....and we're sitting here whining(rather the Leftists are, not us) about semantics and word-games regarding a report that was finished weeks ago.
When the report was finished and when it was released are two different things. Mueller had his own summaries ready to make public at the conclusion of the investigation. Barr decided not to release those, he released a summary that Mueller claims failed to "fully capture the context, nature and substance of this Office's work and conclusions.", something that led some of you guys to claim Trump was exonerated and that the investigation was "over". The truth is now coming out and there is still Mueller's side to be told. Don't be surprised if it differs from Barr's statements.
 
You guys are such marks. The report was never intended to reach a definitive conclusion either way. It was purposely written and released in a way that would keep us arguing over it. Mueller says Trump is innocent but not really...kinda. Apparently there was a 'mood' to the report that Barr didn't accurately represent so now Mueller has to testify and keep this whole circus going. How much you want to bet that during his testimoney Mueller both confirms Trumps innocence while simultaneously insinuating he's still guilty of something ambiguous. Then you will all spend the next two years fighting over the next report or the next hearing. This is so ridiculous watching you guys still arguing over this.

And for those who haven't caught on yet Trump is in on this. This is all a big play that keeps us distracted and fighting over Russian collusion and email servers. Meanwhile nothing happens, no one goes to jail, and the agenda goes full steam ahead.
 
America's anti-hacking laws are so loose, even Donald Trump Jr broke them. So, what do we do about it?
trump-jr-dm.jpg

That's not an opinion, incidentally, it's a fact, at least according to the Mueller Report, finally published earlier this month. However, that dossier makes it plain that federal prosecutors ultimately decided not to press charges against Don Junior, and that decision has become the subject of debate by law professors this week.

Before you get ready to rage-tweet or fury-comment, though, you may find the debate is disappointingly reasonable since it is built around how badly written tech law has ended up giving prosecutors too much leeway in deciding when to bring cases and when to let them drop: a situation that everyone should be able to agree is not a great thing.

But before the reasonableness, let's get some digs in. The president's son is such a weapons-grade idiot that this isn't the only time that Mueller decided not to prosecute him for breaking the law because he was too thick to realize that what he was doing was illegal.

The other time is, of course, when he agreed to a meeting in Trump Tower with Russians offering "dirt" on Hillary Clinton. Accepting help from a foreign power during an election is a federal crime but Mueller ultimately decided not to prosecute because for Don Junior to be found guilty it would have to be proved that he knew he was breaking the law.

And, without explicitly saying it, Mueller decided that Trump Jr's inevitable "I don't really know what's going on at any given point in my life" defense was going to be all too believable.

Fortunately, no one is really arguing that Don Junior should be prosecuted for being dumb enough to actually log into someone else's server using a password sent by an anonymous stranger. Given the unimportant nature of the website, it definitely fits into the misdemeanor side of the sentencing equation.

But by redacting the reasoning in the Mueller Report to avoid embarrassing the president and his son, law professors are arguing that we are losing a critical piece of guidance for future prosecution.

It is fair to assume that Mueller and his team carefully considered whether to prosecute what is an obvious breaking of the law and, due the spotlight that was going to be put on any such decision, were very careful in explaining how they reached that decision.

In the absence of properly worded and defined law covering the unauthorized entry into other people's computers and servers, having that kind of expert opinion would be extremely useful.

But as with everything around Trump and the Russia investigation, it seems the world is determined not to learn anything useful from it but instead use it as a weapon against whoever you happen to dislike today.

And for Trump supporters, you can also get annoyed about this decision because ill-defined prosecutorial discretion was also behind the decision by former head of the FBI James Comey not to prosecute Hillary Clinton over her use of a personal server to carry out official government business. Not so much "lock her up!" as "better define the statutes to provide greater clarity in future decisions!"

When/if the Mueller report does finally get unredacted, this part of the report may provide some useful guidance and hence case law to better define computer fraud.
I leave it to the reader to form an opinion on the seriousness of the crime, but it leaves no doubt Jr. is a moron. And it leaves no doubt Barr's redactions are intended to serve the President, not justice. Fuck 'em both.
 
You guys are such marks. The report was never intended to reach a definitive conclusion either way. It was purposely written and released in a way that would keep us arguing over it. Mueller says Trump is innocent but not really...kinda. Apparently there was a 'mood' to the report that Barr didn't accurately represent so now Mueller has to testify and keep this whole circus going. How much you want to bet that during his testimoney Mueller both confirms Trumps innocence while simultaneously insinuating he's still guilty of something ambiguous. Then you will all spend the next two years fighting over the next report or the next hearing. This is so ridiculous watching you guys still arguing over this.

And for those who haven't caught on yet Trump is in on this. This is all a big play that keeps us distracted and fighting over Russian collusion and email servers. Meanwhile nothing happens, no one goes to jail, and the agenda goes full steam ahead.
What's the agenda?
 
lol yes it is.

Even if Mueller recommended charging the president, he's not the final authority on that. Barr was not recused.

You are delusional. You don't know what you're talking about.
You do know that within the report Mueller wrote he states MULTIPLE TIMES that he has no authority to charge a sitting president with anything, right? Maybe that's me posing a silly question. You obviously don't know that.
 
So Barr no showed at the house.

Contempt of congress incoming.

The White House saying it's "unprecedented" to have legal counsel question someone in Congress. This is correct, it is unprecedented...since September 2018, the last time it happened.
 
So Barr no showed at the house.

Contempt of congress incoming.

The White House saying it's "unprecedented" to have legal counsel question someone in Congress. This is correct, it is unprecedented...since September 2018, the last time it happened.


My god, Barr giving zero fucks about leftist tactics just drives liberals crazy.


It seems none of the politicians on the left, nor the media have what it takes to lay a finger on this guy. They’re crying because they need all of the lawyers for half of the house combined to even make it a fair fight.


Y’all are seriously lacking any heavyweights capable of going toe to toe with him. As it stands, it’s like watching Jones toy with a lightweight.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top