Barr and Mueller's Two Testie-fy (SCO v. 34)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Barr deciding not to release his summaries, his failure to "fully capture the context, nature and substance of this Office's work and conclusions." in his own summary, setting an inaccurate narrative more favorable to Trump for weeks before releasing the redacted report is clearly a betrayal of trust.
Click to expand...

@LangfordBarrow

A betrayal of trust? You mean you trusted Barr, and he has made you lose trust in him?

Again, one of my points is that I never trusted him and I don't think you should have either.
 
waiguoren said:
@LangfordBarrow

A betrayal of trust? You mean you trusted Barr, and he has made you lose trust in him?

Again, one of my points is that I never trusted him and I don't think you should have either.
Click to expand...
Public trust, stop playing word games, the AG should act ethically even if "you can't trust a public servant".
 
LangfordBarrow said:
Public trust, stop playing word games
Click to expand...
I wasn't.
LangfordBarrow said:
the AG should act ethically even if "you can't trust a public servant".
Click to expand...
Yes, he should. I am not sure if he did or did not act ethically, as I didn't even bother to listen to today's hearings. Again, it's not a very important issue to me compared to others, especially when we consider that the full Mueller report is available for all of us to read.
 
waiguoren said:
I wasn't.

Yes, he should. I am not sure if he did or did not act ethically, as I didn't even bother to listen to today's hearings. Again, it's not a very important issue to me compared to others, especially when we consider that the full Mueller report is available for all of us to read.
Click to expand...
If it isn't an important issue and you didn't even listen to the hearings then why are you interjecting so forcefully?
 
Why do you idiots get so angry at this ridiculous political theater charade they have been running nonstop for years.
Worry about your own lives and what you can do to make the country better if that is your desire.
The entire world is sick of this story. It's really not interesting at all.
 
BossRootin said:
Why do you idiots get so angry at this ridiculous political theater charade they have been running nonstop for years.
Worry about your own lives and what you can do to make the country better if that is your desire.
The entire world is sick of this story. It's really not interesting at all.
Click to expand...

Well said. There's a place out there where we have an armored vehicle literally running over people....and we're sitting here whining(rather the Leftists are, not us) about semantics and word-games regarding a report that was finished weeks ago.
 
Rachel Maddow, Democrats used misleading Barr video to suggest he lied to Congress, reporter finds

MSNBC's "Rachel Maddow Show" and certain congressional Democrats used a misleading video in order to suggest Attorney General William Barr lied to lawmakers, a Washington Free Beacon report found Wednesday.

Maddow played a clip of the exchange between Barr and Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., from a hearing in early April about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report. Her show tweeted out the clip Tuesday night.

In that hearing, Barr replied to Van Hollen that he didn’t know if Mueller agreed with a "conclusion" of his about the report. As Free Beacon reporter Alex Griswold noted, it came after Van Hollen asked Barr about his findings regarding obstruction-of-justice allegations.



"In context, it's obvious Barr wasn't being asked whether Mueller agreed with his ‘conclusion’ meaning his four-page summary, his framing of his facts, etc., but about his ultimate conclusion on obstruction of justice," Griswold wrote.

Mueller had left that question open in the report, which had not yet been publicly released.

It was revealed late Tuesday that Mueller had already expressed frustration to Barr in March about how his findings were portrayed.

Van Hollen called on the attorney general to quit his job Wednesday, saying Barr "totally misled me, the Congress, and the public. He must resign." Congressional Democrats have accused Barr of trying to spin Mueller’s report to favor the president.

Meantime, Maddow asked on her show, "When the attorney general said he doesn't know how Mueller felt about his conclusion, and he says that under oath, is that a problem?" MSNBC did not respond to Fox News' request for comment.

Barr has told members of the House Judiciary Committee that he will not testify before their committee Thursday. Barr appeared Wednesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee.


>>> People want to accuse Barr of "misleading" them..... CNN and MSNBC are the masters of this.
 
glenwo2 said:
>>> People want to accuse Barr of "misleading" them..... CNN and MSNBC are the masters of this. [/SIZE]
Click to expand...

Can you really call them "masters" if the majority of people don't believe them, and their efforts always go unrewarded?
 
HereticBD said:
Can you really call them "masters" if the majority of people don't believe them, and their efforts always go unrewarded?
Click to expand...

That's......actually a valid point.

I'm at a loss now. :p
 
glenwo2 said:
Rachel Maddow, Democrats used misleading Barr video to suggest he lied to Congress, reporter finds

MSNBC's "Rachel Maddow Show" and certain congressional Democrats used a misleading video in order to suggest Attorney General William Barr lied to lawmakers, a Washington Free Beacon report found Wednesday.

Maddow played a clip of the exchange between Barr and Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., from a hearing in early April about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report. Her show tweeted out the clip Tuesday night.

In that hearing, Barr replied to Van Hollen that he didn’t know if Mueller agreed with a "conclusion" of his about the report. As Free Beacon reporter Alex Griswold noted, it came after Van Hollen asked Barr about his findings regarding obstruction-of-justice allegations.



"In context, it's obvious Barr wasn't being asked whether Mueller agreed with his ‘conclusion’ meaning his four-page summary, his framing of his facts, etc., but about his ultimate conclusion on obstruction of justice," Griswold wrote.

Mueller had left that question open in the report, which had not yet been publicly released.

It was revealed late Tuesday that Mueller had already expressed frustration to Barr in March about how his findings were portrayed.

Van Hollen called on the attorney general to quit his job Wednesday, saying Barr "totally misled me, the Congress, and the public. He must resign." Congressional Democrats have accused Barr of trying to spin Mueller’s report to favor the president.

Meantime, Maddow asked on her show, "When the attorney general said he doesn't know how Mueller felt about his conclusion, and he says that under oath, is that a problem?" MSNBC did not respond to Fox News' request for comment.

Barr has told members of the House Judiciary Committee that he will not testify before their committee Thursday. Barr appeared Wednesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee.


>>> People want to accuse Barr of "misleading" them..... CNN and MSNBC are the masters of this.
Click to expand...

Yeah, Barr obviously lied.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,282,573
Messages
58,448,192
Members
176,041
Latest member
jaybuff

Share this page

Back
Top