- Joined
- Jun 13, 2005
- Messages
- 61,626
- Reaction score
- 25,714
Abolition of the 2nd Amendment. Mainline party Democrats have made that agenda clear. It's not even a hidden secret anymore.In your opinion, what is the end goal of that agenda?
Abolition of the 2nd Amendment. Mainline party Democrats have made that agenda clear. It's not even a hidden secret anymore.In your opinion, what is the end goal of that agenda?
You mean that unsubstantiated 50% "statistic" that continues to get thrown around here like gospel? That was also fake news.After the Toronto mass shooting our media ran haywire with headlines about our legal gun market from states like Michigan, Indiana, and Illinois pouring over the border into Canada. I was appalled.
Then I saw a Canadian article where a longtime Toronto LEO in the area who had been part of anti-firearm contraband task forces put that nonsense to bed by quoting a slew of your own stats citing they were internally source. Turns out most of the articles I found in the American press were syndicated, and all written by the same woman who was part of an anti-firearm think tank. Chelsea Parsons of the Center for American Progress:
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/guns-crime/reports/2014/06/18/91998/women-under-the-gun/
You simply cannot trust most of the American press to cover this issue honestly, anymore. There is an agenda at full throttle with no accountability.
I'd like to dive even deeper into your analysis.Abolition of the 2nd Amendment. Mainline party Democrats have made that agenda clear. It's not even a hidden secret anymore.
I'd like to dive even deeper into your analysis.
What do you believe their purpose is in wanting to abolish the 2nd Amendment?
What do you believe to be the ultimate endgame?
Imagine if the U.S had some halfway decent firearms regulations at the national level. It would go a long way to help preventing stuff like this from happening. Although it wouldn't stop it completely, it would be beneficial. Just something like having a firearm licencing system/background checks on the national level.
Anyone remember Ian Thomson from Port Colborne, Ontario who got charged with unsafe storage when he fired at people trying to burn his house to the ground while it was occupied?
Also, fuck Canada.
I meant that the USA should try to get a better handle on their guns.
I think current gun laws in Canada are OK although a think a long gun registry is a good idea.
Americans are always getting evangelical about their obsessions with guns.
The obsession seems one sided, and doesn't seem to be coming from the people that see them as tools with a purpose.
There's the one liner from you. It's always around the corner.Build the wall
You're right about the latter half, but "tools with a purpose" in no way describes the American firearms politics which are constantly on display.
I agree, who's initiating the politics though? Why would there even be a discussion if there weren't people rabid about stripping people of their rights?
Imagine if the U.S had some halfway decent firearms regulations at the national level. It would go a long way to help preventing stuff like this from happening. Although it wouldn't stop it completely, it would be beneficial. Just something like having a firearm licencing system/background checks on the national level.
Because there's people that are rabid about their guns as political identity. Social media festers with them.
Build that wall!I don't think allowing easier access to handguns would help at all, it would just make it easier for criminals to get them. They wouldn't need to buy them from smugglers. If anything, the loosey goosey access to them in the US is hurting us Canadians.
I don't know maybe you can find some anecdotes, but again there doesn't seem like there'd even be a discussion about guns if there wasn't the push to lock people in cages for having them. Landing the obsessed category with the ones initiating the conversation, right?