- Joined
- Sep 24, 2007
- Messages
- 57,981
- Reaction score
- 30,519
You say I'm "dodging stats" yet again — and it makes me laugh because your stat was a tap-im freebie... "100% takedown accuracy". Yes, I contextualized it and that's exactly what stats require. If all, and I mean all, of Tom's takedowns landed against guys with garbage-level takedown defense (think Spivac, Baudot, Arlovski), then yes, your stat is accurate but click bait If you think it predicts success against an elite TDD guy like Pereira. That's not double standard, it's called analytical rigor... Statistics speak louder with context, always, which you miss...
You keep acting like I invented the Craig Jones thing... He's literally on Tom's fucking channel praising his attention to his grappling lmao. It's taken so seriously that EssentiallySports commented fans were scared for Ciryl Gane... This is not unicorn shtick lol it's intentional defensive and offensive evolution for a heavyweight. Yeah bright lights didn't affect performance, ok, but Tom said it in RESPONSE to a QUESTION about facing ALEX PEREIRA... So either you mean nothing when I quote what he literally said, or you believe what he says is irrelevant. Pick one.
You say : "if Alex loses again to Ank, you'll just pivot to big Ank vs Tom"... I adjust as what we see happens. That's a plus, not a down. Claiming that evolving your position is somehow dishonest is not good faith, unless you think blind loyalty that never shifts is a virtue. If Alex has more wins than losses vs those same guys... Cool, I stick. If not, I shift downward. That's how smart posters do, they don't deny reality. But if Alex makes it competitive enough to the point it's very very close or wins, he's guaranteed to fight in HW. That's not me saying it... That's the UFC saying Alex will fight either Gane or Tom... So win or lose, he will fight at HW. Anyways he could of have anyways without the rematch... You can move up a division at will if you don't have a belt. Even more the biggest star of the sort... Duhh
Actually I explicitly said I don't expect you to agree... I said I see it as 60/40 Alex. That's me saying how I believe in what I say, not a guaranteed prophecy... That's nuance. And I explained it in trades, data, angles, you just jump to do mini rants about projection while only picking through the tone, not the content. That's not debate, that's dodge from you. If you want to say Tom has elite TD success against early round opponents, fair, I'll grant that... If you want to ignore how that record might shatter vs a trained Pereira who eats Ankalaev's clean entries while injured and still won the 5th round, well, then you might be surprised and confused when the fight happens...
.., Plus if you feel I'm misinterpreting quotes, then quote it out, explain how it's misinterpreted and add an alternative reading... Ironically that's the same thing you accuse me of doing... At the end, I'm just calling what I think is most likely. You're free to disagree but at least make a point replying to my arguments, "nothing" again is not a criticism, it's skipping the chessboard and sticking to your own narrative. If you can actually challenge the substance then cool, if not, move on.
It's late and I'm not replying to all this now. But you need to self analyze a bit. Yes, adjusting on the fly is fine. It's not a bad thing. But when you just say your context is ______, you gotta understand that others may well disagree with the subjective things you use as context. Aspinall takes everyone down he tries to take down so far. That YOU think they suck ar TDD is fine but just saying that means Alex (who's never faced a true HW) can stop it seems wildly optimistic on your part.