- Joined
- Jul 19, 2010
- Messages
- 54,689
- Reaction score
- 12,024
Don't forget "Obama tapped my phones but I didn't really mean a real wire tap but maybe my microwave"
And the job data from Obama term was fake, but now its 100% real.
Don't forget "Obama tapped my phones but I didn't really mean a real wire tap but maybe my microwave"
The job data from the Obama admin was juiced, no doubt. People aren't as stupid as some of you guys assume. Hearing a report on CNN about how great the economy is can only lift a guys spirits for about half of his ride to his part time job at Walmart selling shit that other countries make.And the job data from Obama term was fake, but now its 100% real.
The job data from the Obama admin was juiced, no doubt. People aren't as stupid as some of you guys assume.
Again, lowest workplace participation in 40 years makes those job numbers seem better than they are. Also, are you telling me the quality of the jobs is irrelevant? Because its not irrelevant to the people who do those shitty jobs.These two statements are kind of contradictory. The job data has been calculated the same way for decades. Didn't change under Obama and hasn't changed under Trump. Your argument basically boils down to "I don't believe good numbers when someone not in my tribe is in the WH." That's kind of textbook stupid.
The job data from the Obama admin was juiced, no doubt. People aren't as stupid as some of you guys assume. Hearing a report on CNN about how great the economy is can only lift a guys spirits for about half of his ride to his part time job at Walmart selling shit that other countries make.
OK, 9th circuit.Juiced? got any evidence of that? pretty serious accusation against the the US Census Bureau.
Considering how important the data the US Census Bureau produces, i would assume accusations of tampering would be quite the headlines.
Continue to be ignorant and wonder how we elected a guy like Trump.
You think so, I'm aware of that. Most people who are left leaning do not relate to the people who voted for Trump at all. You just don't get it. I'm not insulting or acting high and mighty either. I just honestly believe you do not understand this country as well as you think you do.The irony is so rich.
Again, lowest workplace participation in 40 years makes those job numbers seem better than they are. Also, are you telling me the quality of the jobs is irrelevant? Because its not irrelevant to the people who do those shitty jobs.
Juiced? got any evidence of that? pretty serious accusation against the the US Census Bureau.
Considering how important the data the US Census Bureau produces, i would assume accusations of tampering would be quite the headlines.
You think so, I'm aware of that. Most people who are left leaning do not relate to the people who voted for Trump at all. You just don't get it. I'm not insulting or acting high and mighty either. I just honestly believe you do not understand this country as well as you think you do.
No, I researched last time we had this exact conversation. The job numbers are dominated by people who work part time and in low wage positions. Lowest worker participation, shitty part time jobs = great economy?The quality of jobs has also been rising, and wages are high. What you're doing is just assuming things and not even attempting to look anything up. It's not a good way to find the truth.
Seems to me that an aging population and higher college attendance are the primary drivers for the long-term downtrend in LFP. Your theory is what? Obama started it a decade before he took office? If you focus on men, the downturn is much longer (women started entering the workforce, which counteracted the decline in male LFP, but that counter trend matured around 2000).
He thinks they're tampered with because he's so tribalistic he literally cannot even imagine anyone else caring about truth. Liberals are all evil monsters so of course they're going shadily distort the numbers. No evidence is needed.
Given that most Americans have a negative opinion of Trump, you might want to examine the depth of your own understanding.
You think so, I'm aware of that. Most people who are left leaning do not relate to the people who voted for Trump at all. You just don't get it. I'm not insulting or acting high and mighty either. I just honestly believe you do not understand this country as well as you think you do.
Thanks for correcting my spelling, it shows you care.Huh. No I responding to this asinine thread created by some envious doofus.
It's spelled "favorability" btw.
LOL, as though you couldn't take umbrage with Sessions as a pick for AG without it being political.Cory Booker buried himself when he took a political stance against an active Senator in Sessions
No, I researched last time we had this exact conversation. The job numbers are dominated by people who work part time and in low wage positions. Lowest worker participation, shitty part time jobs = great economy?
Well, I guess. By the numbers anyway. Thanks, numbers.
didn't median wage grow 5% in 1997? and 4.9% in 1999?
so where do people get these fantastical 'highest numbers ever' for Obama at?
I did, I used the SSA median wage growth chart.....3.74% in 2015.It was more than 5% in 2015 (rounded to 5%).
For fuck's sake people, look shit up before making fools of yourselves.
https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2016/demo/p60-256.pdf