- Joined
- Mar 17, 2007
- Messages
- 3,739
- Reaction score
- 0
Have you seen floyd box?
Not a whole lot. Bits and pieces. Watched the Pacquaio fight. Why?
Have you seen floyd box?
Not a whole lot. Bits and pieces. Watched the Pacquaio fight. Why?
Because you sound like you haven't seen enough of his mastery yet. People that have watched enough of him know its close to impossible to beat him and that there's no way a guy with Connors experience and skill level would be even able to make it competitive.
Dude could be a sensational allround cook
But he will not beat the g.o.a.t. sushi chef in preparing sushi.
Is it now more clear?
You're a fool if you don't think a prime, 28 year old Conor McGregor doesn't have a shot against a 40 year old Floyd Mayweather.
Just like Canada would never be able to brew a Whiskey that beats Scotch... oh wait. That happened last year.
Not that I'm in to the Scotch. I just know Canada beat the Scotts at their own brewing.
Floyd isn't Eddie Alvarez. He's not just going to stand their like an asshole and get crushed in the face.Walk him down and put the left on his chin
Better men have tried then Connor and failed.Mentally break him and make Floyd get aggressive to make a point and the smaller, 40 year old boxer gets countered to another dimension
His only shot is to clip him with something big and KO him.
He's not outboxing Money, even if he trains another half dozen years in boxing.
Maybe you haven't been around the MMA scene long to enough to know that nothing is impossible.
I've watched enough of his highlights to know his ass has been saved from getting knocked out in multiple different fights. Refs just blatantly jump in and save him. He's not unbeatable. He's great, but not unbeatable.
Anyways, my post explained that Floyd is the favourite and easily at that. I was throwing out factors that I think work in McGregors favour.
Oh your a highlight expert?I've watched enough of his highlights
Oh your a highlight expert?
Try actually watching a fight , bruh..