Dogs of piece strike yet again (video included)

Status
Not open for further replies.
I was thinking of buying a dog since my tenant is a nutbag but I decided on a large knife and gun instead
 
I absolutely despise these threads and the pieces of shit that post in them. The reason people know vicious pits is because you know lowlife shits that don’t raise their dog properly.

I have stated many times and will state again that I own a very successful dog walking and pet sitting company that sees three pits. I would gladly put any child of any age in front of those dogs unattended. Why? Because the owners are not piece of shit human beings who raise their dogs properly.

Pits can be fantastic family dogs if it isn’t ghetto thugs, trailer trash or negligent owners who own them and raise them to be vicious.
 
I absolutely despise these threads and the pieces of shit that post in them. The reason people know vicious pits is because you know lowlife shits that don’t raise their dog properly.

I have stated many times and will state again that I own a very successful dog walking and pet sitting company that sees three pits. I would gladly put any child of any age in front of those dogs unattended. Why? Because the owners are not piece of shit human beings who raise their dogs properly.

Pits can be fantastic family dogs if it isn’t ghetto thugs, trailer trash or negligent owners who own them and raise them to be vicious.

I agree about pits but I'm not leaving my child with any dog until they can defend themselves against it. My daughter will never be able to overpower a pit so we will just never own one. Better safe than sorry when it comes to our children. In this case anyway.
 
I made the decision to end the life of two older dogs with very little chance of being rehoused. One had bad back legs due to age, the other was brutally violent with other dogs. They lasted well over 10 and had an exceptional life, why on earth would I send the poor things at that age to battersea dog shelter, where there's already pitbulls oozing out of the cages due to the breeds issues.

The decision to put them to sleep was a no brainer, they had no happy life living in a shelter at 11 and 13.

That's a way different story than your first post implied. You really came off like a lazy dick that found a heartless vet to kill your dogs for you.
 
You are not allowed to walk down the street with a knif on you but you are allowed to walk down the street with a dangerous dog that can kill anyone on command. Makes sense.

You can't carry in knife where you live? I could carry a katana around in AZ if I wanted to.
 
You can't carry in knife where you live? I could carry a katana around in AZ if I wanted to.
That's why we have less killings than you over there. The only places where people get stabbed and robbed is where there are a certain kind of people, and we usually avoid them and their places.

That would be a shitty place to live in where one could go around with a katana on his back and a gun on his waist. But of course people don't or else there would be people being killed everyday.
 
Germany already has this largely figured out. It's not rocket science but Americans treat it like it's some kind of issue you can't approach. Germany is seeing a 70% decrease in bites from those dogs.


  • Breeding, selling and trading of pit bulls is prohibited. Only adopting is allowed.
  • They must get a written permission from the Animal Control Officer before adopting a pit bull under the following restrictions:
    a.) They must prove their ability to handle the dog
    b.) They must not have a criminal record nor a drug addiction
    c.) They have to pay a special tax

Article 1
Dangerous dogs are those that
  1. Belong to a dangerous breed (American Staffordshire Terrier, Bull Terrier and Pit Bull Terrier) unless a certified veterinarian has proven their good character
  2. Have ever attacked humans or other animals
Article 2
Breeding of dangerous dogs is prohibited
Article 3
Buying and selling of dangerous dogs is prohibited
Article 4
Training dogs to attack humans is prohibited
Article 5
Keeping dangerous dogs requires a license which is only granted to adults who fit the legal conditions
  1. Must be over 18 years old, must prove knowledge of how to handle a dog, must have insurance and must keep the dog on a fenced property
  2. Dogs bought in 2000 or earlier may be kept without a written license if the other conditions are met
  3. County officers may prevent individuals from keeping or breeding a dangerous dog
  4. Dangerous dogs may not annoy other people
  5. Dog owner's property must be labelled "Beware of the dog"
  6. County officers may check dog owner's property
Article 6
Dangerous dogs must be leashed and muzzled when in public
Article 7
The dog owner must notify the officer when he abandons his dog
Article 8
The owner of a dangerous dog must pass a written exam in order to prove theoretical knowledge of how to handle his dog
Article 9
People
  1. Who have once been convicted to more than 60 days in prison with or without probation (= or an equal fine which is calculated according to days in prison) or
  2. Who have twice been convicted to less than 60 days in prison with or without probation within in the last five years, not including the time in prison itself
  3. Who are addicted to alcohol or drugs
  4. Who are mentally or physically disabled may not own a dangerous dog
Article 10
Cities may impose a special dog tax for dangerous dogs (= about 600 EUR per year)
Article 11
Breeding of dangerous dogs and ordering the dog to attack may be punished with two years in prison
Article 12
Keeping a dangerous dog without permission, without proper fence or without leash, allowing them to run on playgrounds or owning more than one dangeous dog may be punished with up to 25,000 EUR fine.
Article 13
Officers may enter private houses in order to check the dogs (= a modest infringement of constitutional rights for reasons of public safety)
Article 14
Local dog restrictions (= e.g. in parks) may be added according to legal authorization
Article 15
This law is valid on August 25th, 2000
My only concern (outside of the general intrusion of government even further) is all the breeds far more capable of killing men. They will simply fill the void amongst undesirables looking for a tough breed. Ovcharkas, Presas, Dogos, Cane Corsos, etc. Larger breeds with surprising strength and speed. You guys think APBTs are bad? Just wait until larger and more capable (and less personable in many cases) breeds are all the rage. You would end up having to regulate all manstoppers. A more reasonable approach may be to regulate the breeding and neutering of non-breeding animals. Uncut males are especially hazardous.
 
That's why we have less killings than you over there. The only places where people get stabbed and robbed is where there are a certain kind of people, and we usually avoid them and their places.

That would be a shitty place to live in where one could go around with a katana on his back and a gun on his waist. But of course people don't or else there would be people being killed everyday.

The area I live in the murder rate is low, 1 per 100k or less (less most years), similar to European countries and people carry all over the place here.
 
If you take ownership of an animal you should care for it.

Why would it make a difference? Well if the animal was bred as a pet and someone choose to kill it, not care for it properly, throw it away, etc it could have bought/adopted by someone that would have cared for it properly as a pet.

There is a distinction imo and if you don't agree

<JonesDXSuckIt>

I don't care.

I'm just fucking with you dawg.

But philosophically speaking all domestic animals exist for our pleasure. Whether that's eating, playing, foot warming or defending it's all the same imo.
 

No lol. Ccw pistols and pocket knives. This state just doesn't have any laws against the type of knife or length you can carry. So theoretically you can carry a great sword around on your back legally if you wanted to lol.
 
what a fucking pussy. dog is not even that big, although I know they are very powerful. I can honestly say that dog would have been soccer kicked in the head repeatedly ala Shogun style.

domestic dogs are frontrunners, kind of like Overeem. Extremely violent and aggressive until they get hit and see the opponent is not the least bit intimidated or backing down. Then they run as fast as they can tail tucked.

I've had 2-3 encounters with an aggressive dog. Every time, the dog ran the fuck away once it realized I was not fucking around. I've never even had to actually strike one.
 
I had two of these creatures.

Same old story (lovely dogs)

One day the boy got ahold of a Badger and mauled it to death, the display of power was fucking scary. Once my wife pushed out our first kid, I took them both down the vets and they got the needle.
You and Bill Burr both, although he just gave his away.

Bill was and still is a HUGE outspoken lover of Pit Bulls. He went nonstop about how they are misunderstood and the best dogs. He called most people hating on Pits liars and stat manipulators and saying his Pit is a marvelous animal that was well trained and would not attack for no reason. For like 6 years every podcast he went on about how great they were.

But as soon as his wife was due to have a baby, he agonized over it and KNEW he had to get rid of his Pit. Stating truthfully that the dog he talks about in his podcasts is not really his dog. That it had tried to attack his parents, attacked friends and probably would have torn a child apart. Said It was a ticking time bomb and he knew it.

The truth is on most pro Pitbull sites, while in the public sections, the Pit specialists talk the SJW game about how awesome Pits are. But in the training sections where people ask for help, you see the words "Euthanize" and "crate and rotate or get rid of one dog because you cannot train dog aggression out of pits born with it"
 
That's a way different story than your first post implied. You really came off like a lazy dick that found a heartless vet to kill your dogs for you.
Ultimately the decision was based off the safety of a child. Not the age or health. I felt it was necessary to elaborate on the indepth details of the situation because of the reply. Would i have attempted to rehome younger dogs? Sure, but seeking a new home would have an expiry date.
 
You and Bill Burr both, although he just gave his away.

Bill was and still is a HUGE outspoken lover of Pit Bulls. He went nonstop about how they are misunderstood and the best dogs. He called most people hating on Pits liars and stat manipulators and saying his Pit is a marvelous animal that was well trained and would not attack for no reason. For like 6 years every podcast he went on about how great they were.

But as soon as his wife was due to have a baby, he agonized over it and KNEW he had to get rid of his Pit. Stating truthfully that the dog he talks about in his podcasts is not really his dog. That it had tried to attack his parents, attacked friends and probably would have torn a child apart. Said It was a ticking time bomb and he knew it.

The truth is on most pro Pitbull sites, while in the public sections, the Pit specialists talk the SJW game about how awesome Pits are. But in the training sections where people ask for help, you see the words "Euthanize" and "crate and rotate or get rid of one dog because you cannot train dog aggression out of pits born with it"

Bill made the correct decision.
My dogs had the potential to rip a baby to pieces in seconds. That can never be acceptable, given the violent nature of dogs in general, having two in the same house as a newborn baby should be fucking illegal.
 
I made the decision to end the life of two older dogs with very little chance of being rehoused. One had bad back legs due to age, the other was brutally violent with other dogs. They lasted well over 10 and had an exceptional life, why on earth would I send the poor things at that age to battersea dog shelter, where there's already pitbulls oozing out of the cages due to the breeds issues.

The decision to put them to sleep was a no brainer, they had no happy life living in a shelter at 11 and 13.
Can you just edit this into the first post? People don;t read past the first few posts before responding. Trust me it will save you a zillion negative replies from the low attention span dingbats
 
Can you just edit this into the first post? People don;t read past the first few posts before responding. Trust me it will save you a zillion negative replies from the low attention span dingbats
Probably a good idea.
 
I absolutely despise these threads and the pieces of shit that post in them. The reason people know vicious pits is because you know lowlife shits that don’t raise their dog properly.

I have stated many times and will state again that I own a very successful dog walking and pet sitting company that sees three pits. I would gladly put any child of any age in front of those dogs unattended. Why? Because the owners are not piece of shit human beings who raise their dogs properly.

Pits can be fantastic family dogs if it isn’t ghetto thugs, trailer trash or negligent owners who own them and raise them to be vicious.

WRIC+goochland+woman+mauled+by+dogs.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top