Crystaline Entity
Blue Belt
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2017
- Messages
- 635
- Reaction score
- 0
That's because you would not be able to comprehend it anyway.To the tune of, "Ain't No Half Steppin'" by Big Daddy Kane
I didn't read nothin'...
That's because you would not be able to comprehend it anyway.To the tune of, "Ain't No Half Steppin'" by Big Daddy Kane
I didn't read nothin'...
Having Trump derangement syndrome is what it means to be liberal now. That along with being a communist & globalist. Although there are plenty of communist & globalist swamp creatures who are establishment Republicans as well and they fit now as "liberals" too.
This Right here
You can't seriously be this dumb... I did the math with the source you found proved you wrong then you left the thread. You are being delusional.
See post #127
Has he called you dishonest yet?
Why not? Because trying to understand why some don't want to be associated with the SJW wing of the (D) party is too hard for you? Or is denial still kickin' hard?
That's because you would not be able to comprehend it anyway.
You don't actually think nonentity thinks this shit through do you?Don't you think that if your label applies to every single person to your left from communists/marxists to establishment corporatist republicans, that the label is essentially meaningless in any policy sense, and simply used as a slur?
I'm still in the thread. And I provided the info from the source I found earlier in the thread. Then when you said that your source was more up to date, I said that I granted it was better. Then you kept crying and trying to change the subject.
Yeah, I can't see any reasonable justification for either A) counting citizens in bigger states vote less or B) discounting any particular voters when calculating the total. People like @Lionel Mandrake are just expressing tribal allegiances with no regard to whether their views make any sense. Clinton wins if you throw out both CA and TX.
No She Doesn't
Popular Vote Numbers...
Trump 62,984,825
Now lets subtract both Cali totals from the rest of the Country
Trump 62,984,825 - 4,483,810 = 58,501,015
Hillary 65,853,516 - 8,753,788 = 57,099,728
Now that we've subtracted California lets subtract Texas
Trump 58,501,015 - 4,685,047 = 53,815,968
Hillary 57,099,728 - 3,877,868 = 53,221,860
Trump still wins
I'm seeing:
https://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president/california/
LOL! This is getting embarrassing. You'd do better just admitting that you want your "side" to win by any means necessary and don't have any principles here. It's 100% certain that if Trump had won the popular vote and lost the electoral vote, you'd be arguing that it's an injustice.
One of these is not like the others.
There is no such thing as a uniform "liberal" or "conservative" at all. Those two terms are basically used to describe the entire population of the United States. There are not only two groups of people with only two distinct sets of thoughts.
Most people fall somewhere between the far left and far right. But for some reason, political discourse in recent years has mostly ignored everything in between and created two extreme parties that think they are supposed to hate each other and assume the worst about each other.
A lot of people don't even read articles on here anymore. They skim the OP just well enough to identify their tribe, and then post from that perspective without giving it a second thought.
Exactly. The left has turned "liberal" into the ugliest word in the English language. They have embarrassed themselves by having no boundaries to their hate of Trump on top of a disgusting loathing of the US Constitution. It seems that the modern liberal is a re-manifestation of the Bolsheviks from the early 1900's. I would personally much rather be called a N***** than a L******. That's from someone who used to believe in a lot of left leaning policies from years ago. That's exactly why it has become a slur.Don't you think that if your label applies to every single person to your left from communists/marxists to establishment corporatist republicans, that the label is essentially meaningless in any policy sense, and simply used as a slur?
Exactly. Thanks for proving my point.
@computer fogie empty post?To the tune of, "Ain't No Half Steppin'" by Big Daddy Kane
I didn't read nothin'...
Exactly. The left has turned "liberal" into the ugliest word in the English language. They have embarrassed themselves by having no boundaries to their hate of Trump on top of a disgusting loathing of the US Constitution. It seems that the modern liberal is a re-manifestation of the Bolsheviks from the early 1900's. I would personally much rather be called a N***** than a L******. That's from someone who used to believe in a lot of left leaning policies from years ago. That's exactly why it has become a slur.
Has he put you on ignore yet? It's not complete domination until that happens!@Jack V Savage's dishonesty. He claimed that he didn't ghost me here in another thread, so I dug this up and took screen shots and he still can't admit that he was wrong, so I just bumped this to be a dick The exchange starts at post #542 if you're interested. I know I'm being petty, but I'm just having a little fun.
Its absolutely reality. Your denying it based on your own personal beliefs does not change reality. You can claim that the earth is flat, but that does not make it true.I think you've proved my point (that you're tribal/reactionary based on emotional factors) rather than yours (that your definition of liberalism is based in coherent reality).