- Joined
- Jan 24, 2010
- Messages
- 29,636
- Reaction score
- 20,459
Youth and more so violent youth crime seems to be getting out of hand.. personally i would have thrown away the key on the first charges..
Was charged at 13 for murder of another youth ( 16 year old )
A Melbourne teenager who was previously found not guilty of murder because he was 13 years old has appeared in a children’s court over a sickening alleged act.
The boy, now 16, who cannot be named for legal reasons, appeared before a magistrate on Thursday facing a string of charges over the bashing, stabbing and shooting of a 60-year-old man in Gladstone Park in July.
The teen who escaped a murder charge had 44 prior charges when he was 13 years old.
The 16-year-old was 13 at the time and was found not guilty of murder despite footage of the attack showing him stomping on Cutler’s head repeatedly while others stabbed him and returning to stomp on his unconscious body a second time after the first frenzied attack ended.
Common law presumes that when a child is under 14, they lack the capacity to be criminally responsible and the onus is on the prosecution to prove otherwise.
The rule is known as doli incapax.
Im guessing ee are about to have a few more child murderers here which is why i ask the question
Seems ulterly pointless to allow them back into society.. the first kid they gsng killed was stabbed 20+ times and had over 60 blunt force injuries..
By the initial sounds of these new youth gang stabbings. The numbers will be absurd again and i fail to see how murder isnt murder
Youth crime is pretty bad in Australia at the moment, I think they always get bail too which doesn't provide much of a deterrent. Pressure is increasing on the government to do something, our Victorian state government has recently banned machetes, i don't think that will do much, severe penalties are more what might work.