Completely agree and thanks for the kudo's (although i am in no shape or form a top strongman, just using the training methods).
Tbh, I want to start using their methods too. I've always admired strongmen and can definitely appreciate their training methods. Sand bags, kegs, logs, atlas stones, flipping big ass tires and pushing and pulling big ass trucks. If you ever had to fight one of those dudes and they manage to get a hold of you, you're fucked. I don't give a damn about the other guy having a 100th degree masters belt in the invisible death touch. His ass is about to be handed to him in royal fashion.
My point was that even though bodybuilders don't have strength as their core goal, some people tend to think bodybuilders have (almost) no strength at all. As someone who trains a lot with them i can confirm that is bullshit, most of them have a SERIOUS squat, deadlift or bench 1 max.
I for one would never say that they're not strong. Fact is they are strong as hell. You ain't pushing the weight that they're pushing unless you are goddammit strong. They're benching 250+ lbs, DLifting and squatting 300+ lbs. So they're definitely strong. The only thing I wanted to point out was the differences in strength between someone who trains for sarcoplasmic hypertrophy (like the bodybuilder in the vid) vs someone who trains for myofibrillar hypertrophy (possibly like the smaller wrestler in the vid) and the undeniable fact that one is going to be stronger than the other due to the differences in the way that they train. But, THEY ARE BOTH STRONG! Let everyone itt be clear about that. One is just going to be stronger than the other, that's all.
Then again what exactly is functional strength is up for debate and depends on the function we are talking about. It's not like a bodybuilder is completely useless when moving heavy stuff out of a home for example. His cardio is probably a limiting factor, but even then cardio is not a part of (functional) strength imo.
I guess that's a fair observation. By
functionally strong I'm assuming that Mo8_98 and Tephlon and certainly myself mean
Combat Functional. It's one thing to push and pull weights in linear patterns, but pushing, pulling and manipulating weight in different trajectories and multi planar movements is something altogether different. Those are the kinds of movements and trajectory patterns we deal with in combat. Combat (whether for sport or for your life) is never, ever, ever strictly push and pull in a linear pattern of movement. To me functional strength is the ability to apply that strength in all of these movements w/out skipping a beat, which Jay Cutler seemed to have failed at doing in the wrestling match. That's another reason I really am attracted to the idea of training like a strongman. They have the useful strength of bodybuilders to be able to lift a car off of someone (like a bodybuilder would) while also having the strength in mobility, bodyweight manipulation and movement to do the other movements with strength that I just pointed out.
But one thing's for sure; olympic lifters, bodybuilders, strongmen, powerlifters, gymnasts, crossfitters and calisthenics athletes are all strong to one extent or another, in good shape and have all made the decision to take their health and fitness seriously instead of sitting on their asses all day eating pizza and fast food and drinking a 2 liter of
Diet Coke everyday. My advice to anyone is to pick your fitness modality of choice be it calisthenics, bodybuilding, gymnastics, STRONGMAN TRAINING, ASHIHARA KARATE (sorry, couldn't help but show some bias

), stick with it, eat right and take your health and fitness into your own hands instead of leaving it to the medical industry which doesn't have our best interests at heart.
So i guess we agree
Yes Sir and I appreciate the dialogue my friend.
