white people with lots of money like every sport that they can exploit and get a bunch of sponsors and get stupid people to buy what the sponsors tell them to.
While that is true, I think Maverick touches on the true power of golf with his very concise post.
On the one level, the ultra rich in control of what goes on the air (in this case the ghost of Walt Disney---They own ESPN don't they?) would put on zit popping for dollars if there was money to be made.
I think Maverick alludes to the fact that the target audience for golf programming is comprised of moderately wealthy white folks (and now black middle classers as well---Titlest/Nike Thanks you Tiger) that are willing to put out a lot of money for crap to enhance their own pathetic golf prowess.
I grew up golfing (5 or 6 times a summer) on a municipal course (I didn't even see a powercart until I was well into my 20's) that had sand "greens" and cost $8 a round. I had a mixed set of clubs that were partly garage sale, partly my Grandmother's old clubs for a total investment of around $25.
It didn't effect my enjoyment at all, and didn't make me any worse of a golfer than my peer group that had actual sets of clubs and paid drastically more for them (or their parents did at any rate).
However, there are courses that I would never golf on simply because a weekend @ one of them would cost what some people pay for rent in a month, and really, I don't need to have my ego stroked by being overcharged for something.
So... what I'm trying to say is that although some courses are very elitist, the game itself is not so.
Now Hockey on the other hand... that's a rich kid's sport
Really, if you meet somebody that grew up playing Polo (not the water variety) you are dealing with one spoiled SOB.