- Joined
- Aug 27, 2005
- Messages
- 41,410
- Reaction score
- 4
Care to actually substantiate this statement?with a proclivity toward Russian conspiracy
Care to actually substantiate this statement?with a proclivity toward Russian conspiracy
FOX is a hundred times more reliable than It's MSM peers, including NBC and MSNBC.
Incorrect. Her contracts with CNN and ABC were suspended in July. They didn't formally oust her in mid-September, and announced it two weeks later. Furthermore, there was lingering questions in October to whether or not some of the emails in the dumps had been doctored. I'm not sure what the timeline was on the verification of the Brazile-Podesta emails.She resigned in Oct, but I believe the 1st wikileaks dump came in early June.
So for 3+ months CNN didn't have a big enough problem with what she did to ask her to resign.
Wow. Wanna know how I know why you like Fox?So Mr. Will, now employee of NBC and MSNBC, with a proclivity toward Russian conspiracy with his pre-cold war mindset, stops getting called for work from FOX.
"Fox never tried to put words in my mouth, nor was I told explicitly that I was taboo on Trump-Putin matters. I simply was no longer called on for topics central to my expertise."
Now, Mr Will turns this into him walking away?
Yeah, I don't trust Mr. Will.
FOX is a hundred times more reliable than It's MSM peers, including NBC and MSNBC.
Are you genuinely confused, here? Is your reading comprehension this wanting?What am I missing here? Didn't he just say that? Congrats on the Mod btw. I have to say I'm a little surprised as you seem to be dubbed a lot, but congrats none the less.
![]()
Perhaps you can produce a whistleblowing testimonial from an ex-MSNBC or ex-CNN reporter that demonstrates the same bias and narrative-engineering?
Conservatives have more integrity?
Incorrect. Her contracts with CNN and ABC were suspended in July. They didn't formally oust her in mid-September, and announced it two weeks later. Furthermore, there was lingering questions in October to whether or not some of the emails in the dumps had been doctored. I'm not sure what the timeline was on the verification of the Brazile-Podesta emails.
Not that any of this is relevant. Those questions were for a debate with Bernie who was much further to the left than Clinton. So that wasn't reflecting a "left-wing" bias among CNN so much as a DNC bias stemming from Brazile, and CNN rightly took heat for that hire.
Wow. Wanna know how I know why you like Fox?
Are you genuinely confused, here? Is your reading comprehension this wanting?
The problem is that Fox news viewers have been successfully propagandized on the idea of the "librul media" that actual real news seems biased to them.
It is biased. That isn't in contention. You seem to be as confused about this as the Fox viewers you're disparaging.The problem is that Fox news viewers have been successfully propagandized on the idea of the "librul media" that actual real news seems biased to them.
I already gave you a strong hint. Time to shine those elbows.Sure, tell me why, @Madmick?
Just another day in the era of "alternative facts".Anything they disagree with is fake news which is kind of scary
It is biased. That isn't in contention. You seem to be as confused about this as the Fox viewers you're disparaging.
I already gave you a strong hint. Time to shine those elbows.
Are you genuinely confused, here? Is your reading comprehension this wanting?
Hardly equivalent friend. CNN actually reports on other journalists stories unlike fox which omits them outright or only acknowledges the ones that suit their agenda.
What the hell is this nonsense?Unfortunately, FOX news is sort of necessary because of the liberal bias in our media. I would prefer to see more balance by delivering accurate news too, but unfortunately the way right now is one extreme or the other.
Unfortunately, FOX news is sort of necessary because of the liberal bias in our media. I would prefer to see more balance by delivering accurate news too, but unfortunately the way right now is one extreme or the other.
This thread is fucking hilarious.
"All news networks are biased, Fox is no different than CNN! And you're a fool if you watch it."
Yet amazingly, those same people are the ones constantly regurgitating narratives from Fox News. WEIRD. It's almost like, they're fools....
Ah, the article is about Ralph Peters.

They effectively censored him: their own, long-trusted top Russian official.Whatever the case, my point still stands from his quote that FOX never told him what to say or not to say.
Nor would I doubt that he'd have an anti-Russian bias due to being 65 and a former general.
You did not. You failed to substantiate that assertion. This is precisely the issue.Dude... I didn't even respond to your op itt. This was the original comment I was responding to...
And I pointed out that CNN does the same thing. What am I missing here?
That's not my experience of this thread. You don't get to claim my integrity as your own. We aren't monolithic.At least the conservatives itt can admit that Fox News can be shit and pushes a narrative while the liberals see CNN as some sort of gospel.