Everyone in this thread should know this fundamental of making soups-- the "happy trinity":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirepoix_(cuisine)
2:1:1 ratio of Onion/Shallots + Carrots + Celery.
You can use this in more traditional soups which are higher maintenance, and tend to incorporate aromatics like a Bay Leaf, usually, or fresh Rosemary/Thyme, but it works as the base to marry to pretty much any meat in existence. Gotta be careful with aromatics in slow-cooking because they break down, and overwhelm the dish if you're not careful. Use thicker cuts of the mirepoix in the crock-pot so they hold up.
The fact that you linked two videos to support your argument that didn't feature the tool we're discussing in this thread says all that we need to know about your argument.
I'm willing to drop the absolutism and concede that you can cook enjoyable meals using a slow cooker, but you will get better results using other methods, such as the ones featured in the videos you linked.
I don't understand where the basis for your perception of technique is coming from. Do you think stew is some dish so lowly that it isn't worthy of professional kitchens with classically trained chefs? What do you think the pros use to make it? Why do you think they have a million different kinds of pressure cookers in those kitchens? They're just trying to fast-track what a crock-pot does while you're at work.
There's a reason you don't see crock-pot cooking on Iron Chef:
- They don't have time
- Nobody is entertained by watching Lebron shoot lay-ups for an hour
Not sure if you've ever tuned into the
Life of a Chef, but it was hilarious to watch this professional chef, Vivian Howard, who moved back home from North Carolina, and opened up a high-end restaurant, lose to her sister at a family holiday meal because she was so hellbent on proving the superiority of this urban trend that pushes al dente vegetables for everything over classic, southern, home cooking with its supposedly uncouth technique of boiling the hell out of vegetables like collard greens. That was the fad that had spread to New York City from the West Coast where we tend to eat a lot more produce, and freshness of vegetables is a more common style. You blanche the veggies, then you try to leave them alone. Done right, this makes sense in California cuisine.
It doesn't in most southern cooking. My maternal family is from that South. Not sure if you've ever had collard greens in the style her sister made them, but it's just about the only goddamn way I can eat collard greens. If there is a hint of spring or chew left in them...you didn't boil them long enough. You bathe them in butter, you bathe everything in butter, which is where the South learned well from the French, usually with some clarified bacon fat thrown in for good measure, and you boil the hell out of bitter, coarse vegetables until they're not bitter or coarse anymore. It makes perfect sense. You get the most incredible, concentrated, pure collard green flavor that mixes with the richness of the fats. Every single person in her family preferred her sister's dish that was done in this tradition their mother taught them.
You're thinking about this the wrong way. You're not killing flavors. You're concentrating flavors. You're pulling flavor out of the fats and even the bones that you would
never get in a more quickly cooked dish. Appreciate it for its distinct value.
Air fryer wings brah....
Slow cooker/Crock-Pot is $
Fuck any snob who disagrees
Everyone knows I'm a snob, and I
adore slow cookers. Snobs are being misrepresented ITT.
#endsnoboppression