- Joined
- Aug 31, 2009
- Messages
- 22,538
- Reaction score
- 9,858
They would prefer less immigrants. Maybe significantly less immigrants. Not no immigrants. Just like “limited government” doesn’t mean “duhh what about muh traffic lights!!”. It’s a straw man.
Skill doesn’t matter though it can’t be argued that there is a massive skill, innovation, and contribution gap between migrants of the last 40-50 years compared to the migrants before, during, and a little while after world war 2.
Irregardless, what class they fall into ultimately doesn’t matter. I’m a working class person. I have more personal relationships with immigrants than I I do Americans these days. I like them and have more in common with most of them.
Despite that, I’m still disgusted by what I see at the border.
I think people wouldn’t complain if there was atleast some sign that control over our borders belongs to Americans. It pisses people off seeing people March to your border carrying the flag of another country and then refusing to take no for an answer.
That is a spit in the face to everybody. People that don’t mind it would probably take being spit in the face sitting down. Everybody knows this is fucked up.
That is why polls show that most people, right wingers included, support pathways to citizenship…
..but on the other hand the majority of people, many democrats included, would agree with the sentiment that there is an invasion at the southern border. According to a NPR poll that made them quite salty.
The by design contradictory laws meant to sow chaos are obvious to everybody. The asylum loopholes are obscene and the medias insistence that these aren’t pure economic migrants exposing a loophole further creates the anger you see that manifest against migrants and groups that facilitate them.
No SA or CA nation should have people that qualify for asylum. The government would never declare that any of those governments are engaging in active persecution of any group of people.
There is no war. There is no famine. Even “climate change” is a BS excuse unless the US is somehow not touched by it …despite the democrats insistence that every minor or major natural emergency is the result of not electing democrats to change the weather.
There is an excessive amount of gang violence in the United States so that claim is bullshit.
The United States has a bigger Salvadoran and Honduran gang problem than El Salvador and Honduras. The Mexican Cartels operate in the United States…yet, we’re accepting people fleeing gang violence? Fuck off.
Also, it’s always more immigration. We can never talk about less. There will never be reform unless one party gains total control to enact one.
There isn’t an agreement of what border security means. Border security means immigrants aren’t getting over unless fully approved to republicans. To democrats, it only means letting in as many as possible without drawing attention to it.
Skill doesn’t matter though it can’t be argued that there is a massive skill, innovation, and contribution gap between migrants of the last 40-50 years compared to the migrants before, during, and a little while after world war 2.
Irregardless, what class they fall into ultimately doesn’t matter. I’m a working class person. I have more personal relationships with immigrants than I I do Americans these days. I like them and have more in common with most of them.
Despite that, I’m still disgusted by what I see at the border.
I think people wouldn’t complain if there was atleast some sign that control over our borders belongs to Americans. It pisses people off seeing people March to your border carrying the flag of another country and then refusing to take no for an answer.
That is a spit in the face to everybody. People that don’t mind it would probably take being spit in the face sitting down. Everybody knows this is fucked up.
That is why polls show that most people, right wingers included, support pathways to citizenship…
..but on the other hand the majority of people, many democrats included, would agree with the sentiment that there is an invasion at the southern border. According to a NPR poll that made them quite salty.
The by design contradictory laws meant to sow chaos are obvious to everybody. The asylum loopholes are obscene and the medias insistence that these aren’t pure economic migrants exposing a loophole further creates the anger you see that manifest against migrants and groups that facilitate them.
No SA or CA nation should have people that qualify for asylum. The government would never declare that any of those governments are engaging in active persecution of any group of people.
There is no war. There is no famine. Even “climate change” is a BS excuse unless the US is somehow not touched by it …despite the democrats insistence that every minor or major natural emergency is the result of not electing democrats to change the weather.
There is an excessive amount of gang violence in the United States so that claim is bullshit.
The United States has a bigger Salvadoran and Honduran gang problem than El Salvador and Honduras. The Mexican Cartels operate in the United States…yet, we’re accepting people fleeing gang violence? Fuck off.
Also, it’s always more immigration. We can never talk about less. There will never be reform unless one party gains total control to enact one.
There isn’t an agreement of what border security means. Border security means immigrants aren’t getting over unless fully approved to republicans. To democrats, it only means letting in as many as possible without drawing attention to it.
Last edited:
