And Brock retired years before 200. Retired fighters are fair game for the X00 cards.Condit retired years ago.
And Brock retired years before 200. Retired fighters are fair game for the X00 cards.
I think he still has what it takes to beat Paddy.
If you look at it, Paddy will try to grapple and I think Jim is better there.
Jim is also capable of knocking Paddy clean out tbf.
I think he can beat Paddy.
Jim Miller is a legend who has earned the right to be the trivia answer "Which fighter fought at UFC 100, 200 & 300?"
Paddy hasn't earned the right to be part of that footnote, imo.
Paddy needs to admit he was gifted a very questionable controversial "W" vs Jared Gordan, then prove he is worthy of his roster spot by actually beating a fighter on the upswing. Not even a contender, just someone who still could possibly grow into being a contender.
Paddy is not worthy of a slot on a historic card like 300, imho.
I think he still has what it takes to beat Paddy.
If you look at it, Paddy will try to grapple and I think Jim is better there.
Jim is also capable of knocking Paddy clean out tbf.
It would be a great send off if he wonThey're actually quite well matched to be honest. Generally I like the older dudes to fight the older dudes, seems a bit fairer but i'm ok with Paddy v Jim.
I wouldn't be opposed to the Johnson fight. It's a shame he's got one booked inChase Hooper or Michael Johnson
Jim Miller is a legend who has earned the right to be the trivia answer "Which fighter fought at UFC 100, 200 & 300?"
Paddy hasn't earned the right to be part of that footnote, imo.
Paddy needs to admit he was gifted a very questionable controversial "W" vs Jared Gordan, then prove he is worthy of his roster spot by actually beating a fighter on the upswing. Not even a contender, just someone who still could possibly grow into being a contender.
Paddy is not worthy of a slot on a historic card like 300, imho.
Agreed. He needs to set the new losing streak record.Ferguson, Tony needs one more before calling it quits (with the UFC).