White privilege diminishes our humanity: 10 Commitments for meaningful change

[NoDak]

Unpossible!! Those thousands upon thousands of portaits of white folks, continent wide and spanning centuries, of white folks are all clearly forgeries. It is known.

For the curious:

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/how-europeans-evolved-white-skin

The modern humans who came out of Africa to originally settle Europe about 40,000 years are presumed to have had dark skin, which is advantageous in sunny latitudes. And the new data confirm that about 8500 years ago, early hunter-gatherers in Spain, Luxembourg, and Hungary also had darker skin: They lacked versions of two genes—SLC24A5 and SLC45A2—that lead to depigmentation and, therefore, pale skin in Europeans today.

But in the far north—where low light levels would favor pale skin—the team found a different picture in hunter-gatherers: Seven people from the 7700-year-old Motala archaeological site in southern Sweden had both light skin gene variants of SLC24A5 and SLC45A2. They also had a third gene, HERC2/OCA2, which causes blue eyes and may also contribute to light skin and blond hair. Thus ancient hunter-gatherers of the far north were already pale and blue-eyed, but those of central and southern Europe had darker skin.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/26595274/

The specified gene variants not mentioned in the article. Granted, they aren't the only determinants but if you're a European living today there's a greater than 99% chance your DNA has those genotypes.

White due to the geographic location, isolation and climatic environment where low light levels would favor paler skin? It's predominantly due to the SNP variations of the genes SLC45A2 [rs16891982 (G;G)] and SLC24A5 [rs1426654 (A;A)] that swept the continent to lead to the depigmentation of us little modern Euros.

The latter alone is a particular AIM of interest that accounts for up to 38% of the skin tone differences between modern Europeans and Sub-Saharan Africans.

 

[FIMN]

You live under a rock. Or you're lying.

Listen bro obviously identity politics is your thing and that's okay, personally IDGAF. I just find it amusing that people have to resort to misconstruing other peoples arguments because it's easier than actually thinking about things critically.

 

[goldennirvana]

Listen bro obviously identity politics is your thing and that's okay, personally IDGAF. I just find it amusing that people have to resort to misconstruing other peoples arguments because it's easier than actually thinking about things critically.

'Progressives' are firmly entrenched in the business of white guilt. If you aren't aware of this, you must be living under a rock.

 

[NoDak]

'Progressives' are firmly entrenched in the business of white guilt. If you aren't aware of this, you must be living under a rock.

Yea, it used to annoy me but I can't sit here and front like being white isn't fucking awesome.

Fuck's Sake. People need to chill with the hints of genocide and shit though, I'm not feeling that.

 

[ObamaPhoneLady]

I'll rephrase. I've never heard anybody say that. It seems like a strawman to me, in order that you don't have to do anything to actually understand the argument.

Which part are you saying no one says? That being born white is nothing to be proud of? Or that it's something to be guilty of? Noth have been said here hundreds of times... Are you denying the existance of white guilt in liberal circles?

 

[ObamaPhoneLady]

Yea, it used to annoy me but I can't sit here and front like being white isn't fucking awesome.

Fuck's Sake. People need to chill with the hints of genocide and shit though, I'm not feeling that.

Give one example.

 

[TheComebackKid]

You guys are arguing like leftists..."what, huh? It's the current year and you still believe that?!? My professors told me something different...please don't reproduce!"

Lol. Funny how that happens.

 

[TheComebackKid]

Don't you think it's more likely he was referring to olive skin as opposed to lighter white Anglo-Saxon skin tone? Something like this:

Here's the full quote:

24. Which leads me to add one Remark: That the Number of purely white People in the World is proportionably very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny. America (exclusive of the new Comers) wholly so. And in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal Body of White People on the Face of the Earth. I could wish their Numbers were increased. And while we are, as I may call it, Scouring our Planet, by clearing America of Woods, and so making this Side of our Globe reflect a brighter Light to the Eyes of Inhabitants in Mars or Venus, why should we in the Sight of Superior Beings, darken its People? why increase the Sons of Africa, by Planting them in America, where we have so fair an Opportunity, by excluding all Blacks and Tawneys, of increasing the lovely White and Red? But perhaps I am partial to the Complexion of my Country, for such Kind of Partiality is natural to Mankind.

He goes on to swap the word "swarthy" with "black" and "sons of Africa". He then goes on to say that he would like to see "white and red" people in America. Who are red? My guess is those are the olive skinned people you're referring to.

 

[TheComebackKid]

Unpossible!! Those thousands upon thousands of portaits of white folks, continent wide and spanning centuries, of white folks are all clearly forgeries. It is known.

many of them are...

 

[NoDak]

Give one example.

Are you not happy with it? Desirability, for one. I suppose that's not solely a racial thing and wouldn't apply for ugly muhfuckers, although whiteness itself is looked upon favorably throughout Asian and South American countries in particular. India alone consumes 230+ tons of 'skin whitening' products annually.

If you're a European - particularly North/West - you've been born into and are of the wealthiest, most scientifically and technologically advanced macro-culture and group of countries human history has ever known. The level of relative opulence is fucking insane and probably part of why we have nothing better to do than argue over shit like gender identity and tranny bathrooms.

 

[TheComebackKid]

Also, many of you laugh when I say that the elites of this world are luciferians who sacrifice humans and animals to fallen angels/gods. But read Ben Franklin's quote again....

and so making this Side of our Globe reflect a brighter Light to the Eyes of Inhabitants in Mars or Venus, why should we in the Sight of Superior Beings, darken its People?

Ben Franklin believed that "superior beings" resided in the sky and in other planets. And he wanted to design his country to be pleasing in their eyes. That alone doesn't mean much. But when you come across headlines like this it takes on more significance...

Repairs on Franklin’s old London house turned up 1200 pieces of bone from at least 15 people

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smar...nklins-basement-filled-with-skeletons-524521/

Now of course the article goes on to explain it away by speculating about an anatomy school. But that is speculation. What is fact is that one of the founding fathers of the US, a master mason, and a believer in fallen angels had hundreds of bones buried underneath his house way back in the 1700s.

Nothing's changed. Our leaders are still masons who sacrifice people to their gods. Gods like this:

Spoiler

 

[Squarechoke]

Also, many of you laugh when I say that the elites of this world are luciferians who sacrifice humans and animals to fallen angels/gods. But read Ben Franklin's quote again....

and so making this Side of our Globe reflect a brighter Light to the Eyes of Inhabitants in Mars or Venus, why should we in the Sight of Superior Beings, darken its People?

Ben Franklin believed that "superior beings" resided in the sky and in other planets. And he wanted to design his country to be pleasing in their eyes. That alone doesn't mean much. But when you come across headlines like this it takes on more significance...

Repairs on Franklin’s old London house turned up 1200 pieces of bone from at least 15 people

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smar...nklins-basement-filled-with-skeletons-524521/

Now of course the article goes on to explain it away by speculating about an anatomy school. But that is speculation. What is fact is that one of the founding fathers of the US, a master mason, and a believer in fallen angels had hundreds of bones buried underneath his house way back in the 1700s.

Nothing's changed. Our leaders are still masons who sacrifice people to their gods. Gods like this:

Spoiler

If we want to go that route I'd say that all of the west, including the Christians, are on that side. I'd bet big money on that going through the western Christian population I'd find far, far more people who live their lives (talking about what they actually do in life, rather than what they say) more according to the teachings of the Satanic Bible rather than the teachings of Jesus. They are perhaps fully intentional or aware in their choice, but I don't think I'd find many people at all that actually were as bent on helping all poor people like Jesus wanted, and most will be looking after themselves and those close to them, as the Satanic Bible preaches.

So go team Satan!

 

[goldennirvana]

many of them are...

What does an ancient Egyptian statue of a mother breastfeeding her child have to do with Christian iconography?

 

[ObamaPhoneLady]

Are you not happy with it? Desirability, for one. I suppose that's not solely a racial thing and wouldn't apply for ugly muhfuckers, although whiteness itself is looked upon favorably throughout Asian and South American countries in particular. India alone consumes 230+ tons of 'skin whitening' products annually.

If you're a European - particularly North/West - you've been born into and are of the wealthiest, most scientifically and technologically advanced macro-culture and group of countries human history has ever known. The level of relative opulence is fucking insane and probably part of why we have nothing better to do than argue over shit like gender identity and tranny bathrooms.

I was talking about the 'hints of genocide' you alluded to.

 

[TheComebackKid]

If we want to go that route I'd say that all of the west, including the Christians, are on that side. I'd bet big money on that going through the western Christian population I'd find far, far more people who live their lives (talking about what they actually do in life, rather than what they say) more according to the teachings of the Satanic Bible rather than the teachings of Jesus. They are perhaps fully intentional or aware in their choice, but I don't think I'd find many people at all that actually were as bent on helping all poor people like Jesus wanted, and most will be looking after themselves and those close to them, as the Satanic Bible preaches.

So go team Satan!

Agreed

 

[TheComebackKid]

What does an ancient Egyptian statue of a mother breastfeeding her child have to do with Christian iconography?

It has to do with the "whitening" of history

 

[NoDak]

I was talking about the 'hints of genocide' you alluded to.

Oh, yeah. I just notice a lot more open talk about us getting our comeuppance (or "reckoning") these days as the demographics of our countries start to shift. There's a lot of double standards in terms of acceptable public rhetoric and I don't like what I see across academic and journalistic spheres; in some instances that even extends to the bureaucratic level.

 

[goldennirvana]

It has to do with the "whitening" of history

The meme you posted suggests there is a connection between an ancient Egyptian statue of a woman breastfeeding a child and the two pictures of Christian art. You are claiming there's a direct line/connection between them. Your logic goes like this: 'the ancient Egyptian statue is depicting a black woman holding a child, and here's two Christian artworks of women holding a child, and notice how the race of the woman turns white'. Now you need to provide proof that there is a connection between that statue, and the Christian iconography shown in that meme, otherwise your claim has no foundation in reality.

 

[TheComebackKid]

The meme you posted suggests there is a connection between an ancient Egyptian statue of a woman breastfeeding a child and the two pictures of Christian art. You are claiming there's a direct line/connection between them. Your logic goes like this: 'the ancient Egyptian statue is depicting a black woman holding a child, and here's two Christian artworks of women holding a child, and notice how the race of the woman turns white'. Now you need to provide proof that there is a connection between that statue, and the Christian iconography shown in that meme, otherwise your claim has no foundation in reality.

Forget the statue, image started out black...eventually turned white.

Plus I grew up in the US education system and I can go on google and find countless images of black european kings and queens, egyptians, black central american populations, as well as native americans that were presented to us all white or lighter skinned. How come?

 

[goldennirvana]

Forget the statue

Aaaaand just like that, your entire bullshit argument comes crumbling down. How satisfying.

image started out black...eventually turned white.

Which image started out black? None of the women in the dumb meme you posted look in the slightest bit black. Also, you have provided zero proof that the darker-skinned picture was made before the lighter-skinned picture.

Plus I grew up in the US education system and I can go on google and find countless images of black european kings and queens

No you can't.

egyptians, black central american populations, as well as native americans that were presented to us all white or lighter skinned. How come?

When were they "presented" to you like that?