• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

White privilege diminishes our humanity: 10 Commitments for meaningful change

Are you a black hebrew Israelite? I think they are the only ones I've heard of trying to claim Europe is black, and people like shakespeare was actually black.

Well I've never truly considered what the Black Hebrew Israelites claim but as I'm diving into this whole subject I'm finding quite of bit of information I've never been exposed to. An example of that is the fact that the idea of the "colored races of america" being the lost tribes of Israel is not a new...at all. And it didn't originate with modern blacks looking for some historical relevance.

According to the book of Esdras of the Apocrypha(one of the books removed from the Bible) the Israelites were taken 'over the waters" and to a place "their fathers did not know" called Arsereth which some Biblical scholars identify as the Americas.

According to various sources including the books "The Lost Tribes and Promised Lands of Isreal" and "The Origins of the American Indians, European Concepts 1492-1729" this was a commonly held view amongst scholars and explorers, including Christopher Columbus, as they were familiar with the Apochrypa and other lost books of the Bible.

According to some sources this is what was motivating Christopher Columbus to do the voyage. He was looking for the lost tribes of Israel and the lost city of King David. That would explain why he brought Negro, Hebrew speaking translators with him.

I'm all for entertaining the conspiratorial side of civilization (as you know), but even I can't think of a way where the divided people of Europe who were competing with one another in power struggles over centuries were all working together to keep down the true owners of Europe (black people).

Also, you say these white people want to keep the lands for themselves and they control society and yet they are all pushing multiculturalism as basically a new religion and deliberately trying to re-engineer the demographics of all the land you are talking about. Interesting strategy for preserving all the land for white people, wouldn't you say?

Well the main basis for this idea of the Caucasion race, which is really just one nation, looking to conquer and take over lands for themselves comes from a series of papal bulls issued by Rome starting with Dum Diversas of 1452. These decrees basically established that it was their right and duty to find, conquer, perpetually enslave, and put to death all pagans and non-christian peoples and kingdoms while taking the lands for themselves. In other words...Manifest Destiny.

If you look at the last 500 years hasn't this been exactly what has happened?

Regarding the counter productive marxism you reference I would agree that that doesn't make sense. However we do know that there are competing factions, agendas, and battles amongst the world elite including the "luciferian, nwo" types looking to destroy everyone. So who knows.
 
Here is Ben Franklin's description of the Europe and the world during his time:

Which leads me to add one Remark: That the Number of purely white People in the World is proportionably very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny. America (exclusive of the new Comers) wholly so. And in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal Body of White People on the Face of the Earth.

Swarthy = Dark skinned

Tawny = yellow, brown

Saint Maurice of the Roman Empire

st-maurice.jpg


Henry the 2nd

aba53f9aedaeef99374132fc6ff13e04.png


Families and names today described as Angelo Saxon but with black faces on their family crests:

53b7a775a16f3ce70741485a76425935--black-coats-african-culture.jpg


a-this-is-the-coat-of-arms-of-the-swiss-13735407.png


German_2.jpg

Here are some descriptions of famous Europeans we all think are white:

In James M. Kittleson’s ‘Luther the Reformer: the Story of the Man and His Career pg. 43 – The Protestant reformer Martin Luther is described as a SWARTHY man of medium height.

In a Short History of Germany by Emily Hawtrey and Amanda Flattery – Henry III, Holy Roman Emperor due to his black swarthy complexion, he’s known also as: Enrique III El Negro de Alemania, Henry the Black (Le Noir) or Den Svarte,

William Robertson states in the Book “The Reign of Charles V, Vol 3, pg 441 – At noon Bishop Carranza, Archbishop of Toledo, who had long been expected arrived at Yuste. He was the same ‘black friar’ – so called from his swarthy visage-.

Pope Urban VI is describe in the book “Saint Catherine of Siena and Her Times” by Mademoiselle Mori as being born of a Neapolitan father and a Tuscan mother, he was short stoutly made and swarthy, with fiery black eyes.

Ruler of Milan Ludovico Sforza was one of the sons of Fransesco Sforza, Ludovico was known as “the Moor” (his complexion was swarthy). (ref. Travel Guide to Europe, 1492: Ten Itineraries in the Old World — by L. Camusso)

Byantine emperor John II Komnenos (1118-1143) is described by Latin historian William of Tyre as short with eyes, hair and complexion so dark he was known as ‘the Moor’.

Peter the Great of Russia is also described as having black eyes and hair with a swarthy complexion. (ref. A general collection of …voyages and travels, digested – by J. Pinkerton)

In the book “Peter the Great: His Life and World”, Mr. Massie describes the Holy Roman Emperor Leopold of the Hapsburgs as swarthy, of middling height, with the projecting lower jaw and protruding lower lip which traditionally marked (if not disfigured) the Hapsburgs.

in case your unfamilar with the term SWARTHY: Defined – swart, swarth, suart, [sweart = black; Dut. swart: Celt. svartr: Danish. sort: Swedish. Swart: German. Swarz: — Of a black or dark color: swarthy. (Applied especially to the skin)

https://www.africaresource.com/rast...ngly-lines-of-europe-moorish-kings-of-europe/

michael-jordan-laugh.gif
 
There's no white privilege, but there is American and western privilege that many races benefit from.
 
Here is Ben Franklin's description of the Europe and the world during his time:

Which leads me to add one Remark: That the Number of purely white People in the World is proportionably very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny. America (exclusive of the new Comers) wholly so. And in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal Body of White People on the Face of the Earth.

Swarthy = Dark skinned

Tawny = yellow, brown

Saint Maurice of the Roman Empire

st-maurice.jpg


Henry the 2nd

aba53f9aedaeef99374132fc6ff13e04.png


Families and names today described as Angelo Saxon but with black faces on their family crests:

53b7a775a16f3ce70741485a76425935--black-coats-african-culture.jpg


a-this-is-the-coat-of-arms-of-the-swiss-13735407.png


German_2.jpg

Here are some descriptions of famous Europeans we all think are white:

In James M. Kittleson’s ‘Luther the Reformer: the Story of the Man and His Career pg. 43 – The Protestant reformer Martin Luther is described as a SWARTHY man of medium height.

In a Short History of Germany by Emily Hawtrey and Amanda Flattery – Henry III, Holy Roman Emperor due to his black swarthy complexion, he’s known also as: Enrique III El Negro de Alemania, Henry the Black (Le Noir) or Den Svarte,

William Robertson states in the Book “The Reign of Charles V, Vol 3, pg 441 – At noon Bishop Carranza, Archbishop of Toledo, who had long been expected arrived at Yuste. He was the same ‘black friar’ – so called from his swarthy visage-.

Pope Urban VI is describe in the book “Saint Catherine of Siena and Her Times” by Mademoiselle Mori as being born of a Neapolitan father and a Tuscan mother, he was short stoutly made and swarthy, with fiery black eyes.

Ruler of Milan Ludovico Sforza was one of the sons of Fransesco Sforza, Ludovico was known as “the Moor” (his complexion was swarthy). (ref. Travel Guide to Europe, 1492: Ten Itineraries in the Old World — by L. Camusso)

Byantine emperor John II Komnenos (1118-1143) is described by Latin historian William of Tyre as short with eyes, hair and complexion so dark he was known as ‘the Moor’.

Peter the Great of Russia is also described as having black eyes and hair with a swarthy complexion. (ref. A general collection of …voyages and travels, digested – by J. Pinkerton)

In the book “Peter the Great: His Life and World”, Mr. Massie describes the Holy Roman Emperor Leopold of the Hapsburgs as swarthy, of middling height, with the projecting lower jaw and protruding lower lip which traditionally marked (if not disfigured) the Hapsburgs.

in case your unfamilar with the term SWARTHY: Defined – swart, swarth, suart, [sweart = black; Dut. swart: Celt. svartr: Danish. sort: Swedish. Swart: German. Swarz: — Of a black or dark color: swarthy. (Applied especially to the skin)

https://www.africaresource.com/rast...ngly-lines-of-europe-moorish-kings-of-europe/
Are you one of those afrocentrists that claim Europeans like Beethoven were black?
 
White people itt so happy to feel discriminated against. Fight against the racist concept of white privilege!

Sometimes it almost seems like a conspiracy so that white people can become a protected class too. I’m exaggerating of course but consider this:

I’ve been a supervisor of federal and state law enforcement agencies, and every office, Division or Department I’ve worked in has had at least that one horrible worker who blamed every reprimand or negative interaction on racism or sexism. It’s never because they are lazy and have a terrible personality, it’s because they’re black/Latino/female! The last three years I’ve had two white males who’ve pulled this shit now. ”Waaah! I’m being discriminated against because I’m white!” Pretty fucking cunning, you guys.

I’ve never known a successful whiner, work hard and you’ll succeed no matter what anyone thinks of you being black/white/Asian/Latino/Gay. Personally I don’t think there should be any protected classes but here we are.
. ITs sort of telling that people have contempt for the idea when it comes from a certain race, eh?
"aw, poor black people. Aw poor mexicans. Aw, poor Island people of the pacific..." and so on. But its all a big laugh and just SOOOOOO ridiculous that a white person feels singled out.

lol that when white people adopt this age old tactic, suddenly our tolerance for it is gone.
 
What would you call Ben Franklin?
An author, printer, political theorist, politician, freemason, postmaster, scientist, inventor, humorist, civic activist, statesman, and diplomat, a founding father... the list goes on.
It's ok if you don't want to answer, though.
 
An author, printer, political theorist, politician, freemason, postmaster, scientist, inventor, humorist, civic activist, statesman, and diplomat, a founding father... the list goes on.
It's ok if you don't want to answer, though.

The answer to your question is no I'm not not an afrocentrist and I don't k know about Beethoven.

My question for you is if you wouldn't suggest Ben Franklin was an afrocentrist for pointing out that Europe was black in the 1700s then why would you question me simply for quoting him? And then proceed to ignore said quote? Somebody is not being honest...
 
. ITs sort of telling that people have contempt for the idea when it comes from a certain race, eh?
"aw, poor black people. Aw poor mexicans. Aw, poor Island people of the pacific..." and so on. But its all a big laugh and just SOOOOOO ridiculous that a white person feels singled out.

lol that when white people adopt this age old tactic, suddenly our tolerance for it is gone.
I’ve never tolerated it, personally. I’m lamenting the spread of it. But if it causes people to reflect on the weakness of it then so be it.

That’s not to say actually racist or otherwise discriminatory practices don’t exist at all, but I assure you I’ve never seen it in my employment with the government all over the US.
 
This the most interesting part of your post. I hear a lot of people clamoring to "acknowledge" privilege... But do absolutely nothing to rectify the situation. It's just as bad as these assholes who argue with people online all day try to convince global warming is man made... Yet do nothing to reduce their carbon footprint.

Simply running around talking about how you acknowledge or admit something means fuck all. Yet, most of the white guilt crowd thinks that saying it shows they're "woke" and that perception enough to exempt them from action.

and yes, I realize turds like Shaun King throws the term around... But it's primarily white people.
White people are their own worst enemy <Lmaoo>
 
Holy unrealized irony.

No, saying that you are privileged does not imply that you are better than people. Saying that you're entitled to that privilege, or that it does not exist and what comes with it is deserved and natural: that bears the presumption that you're better than other people. Do I think that you consider yourself better than nonwhite people on the basis of your skin? No, that would be a pretty steep presumption. I just think that you're intellectually lazy and that you perceive the term/concept to be a slight against you, so you recoil reflexively.

And, yes, minorities use the term and acknowledge the reality that it describes. Meanwhile, obfuscating and ignorance-languishing threads like this are pretty much only made by the dumbest of white folks (or the very dumbest of nonwhite folks) to bitch about how the well-educated university types just aren't woke to the natural meaning of racial hierarchy like you brainiacs.

FWIW, I would prefer different phrasing at this point, since the color itself is downstream from the concept (it could just as easily be black privilege in a world that civilized differently) and the term "white privilege" just ends of distracting from the actual topic with dumbass conversations like this one. But I don't have the power to change that.

I'll put it this way for you. In the context that white privilege is lost, the next thing that's going to happen is the loss of all your liberties. If you want a free country , the voting preferences by race and thus best fit genetic clusters are very clear. If you want your individual liberties then you want a white majority.

It should be rather convenient for you that the only countries that respect individual liberties to the degree that they're respected, are white countries.
 
It is insane what the media/social media has done to our country...This wasnt even a topic when obama was president.

This new racism/privilege narrative has only started in the last two years...
 
I’ve never tolerated it, personally. I’m lamenting the spread of it. But if it causes people to reflect on the weakness of it then so be it.

That’s not to say actually racist or otherwise discriminatory practices don’t exist at all, but I assure you I’ve never seen it in my employment with the government all over the US.
Fair point. My post did seem to single you out when I was actually speaking generally.
 
Fair point. My post did seem to single you out when I was actually speaking generally.
I wasn’t sure, but it was your mention of Pacific Islanders that made me think you might be singling me out haha. No worries, we seem to be in agreement on this.
 
Back
Top