-
Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it.
Which win was more impressive?
- Thread starter Luffy
- Start date
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2006
- Messages
- 9,377
- Reaction score
- 3,362
Poatan v Jiri 2 at LHW
Ankalaev is good but he doesn't seem like an ungodly good wrestler than will automatically ragdoll everyone
Stipe on the other hand was old and even Rumble Johnson (rip) had a more recent fight than him.
Jones beating Stipe 5 or 6 yrs ago would've been very impressive
Ankalaev is good but he doesn't seem like an ungodly good wrestler than will automatically ragdoll everyone
Stipe on the other hand was old and even Rumble Johnson (rip) had a more recent fight than him.
Jones beating Stipe 5 or 6 yrs ago would've been very impressive
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2006
- Messages
- 9,377
- Reaction score
- 3,362
NopeJones was more impressive for sure
Attachments
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2015
- Messages
- 8,210
- Reaction score
- 9,792
What's wrong with you
Nothing. Are you ok?
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2015
- Messages
- 8,210
- Reaction score
- 9,792
Jones vs Stipe was a cop out. There was literally nothing impressive about it.
Again, what's wrong with you
So why is JJ vs Alex a mismatch? I mean, if Stipe was that bad, the JJ should have taken him out more easily than Poatan vs Jiri, no?
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2015
- Messages
- 8,210
- Reaction score
- 9,792
Lol the fuck are you even on about
Idk... Do you think Alex would handle JJ easily if JJ went to LHW?
- Joined
- May 27, 2010
- Messages
- 7,684
- Reaction score
- 3,158
Based on what?Jones was more impressive for sure
Him being less old that Stipe? That fight should never be spoken of again.
How old was DC when he fought Stipe for the second and third time? And how old was Stipe back then? And how tough were the second and third fights? Just answer me please
- Joined
- May 27, 2010
- Messages
- 7,684
- Reaction score
- 3,158
What does anything about DC's fight with Stipe have anything to do with this?
Stipe was a 42 year old retired firefighter who rolled off the couch to be a sacrifice for Jones for a payday, that's it. The fight was a fucking sideshow and wasn't anything more than a layup to make Jon look good. Frankly, Jones should have been able to put Miocic away sooner, and he should be thanking the MMA gods he got locked in the octagon with Stipe instead of a real top 10 HW.
You didn't answer the question. I'll try again:
How old was DC when he fought Stipe? How old was Stipe back then?
Try to understand the question, it isn't hard.
- Joined
- May 27, 2010
- Messages
- 7,684
- Reaction score
- 3,158
The discussion is about which is a better quality of win... Jones vs. Miocic or Alex vs Jiri. You started this thread. No one else did. Why are you bringing DC into this? Stay on point and stop with your strawman bullshit. Jones vs Miocic was a fucking joke. If you can't understand that or don't get how MMA works, stop posting and do more reading and watching ffs.
Alex's win over Jiri is 1000 times more meaningful than Jones vs. Miocic. Jiri was a top-ranked LHW contender, Alex was the champ... and that's how TITLE fights are supposed to go. The only thing that UFC 309 proved is that Dana will move mountains to make Jones fight.
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2022
- Messages
- 1,115
- Reaction score
- 1,746
Jon Jones. He has been fighting since 2008, has never lost a fight, is still champion, and granted, he beat an old Miocic, the way Jones ended it was still impressive to me. To put that into perspective, the great Fedor's [not being sarcastic, he was great] 10 year winning streak in PRIDE, is often mentioned when talking of his greatness. Jon Jones streak is 16 years and counting!
Latest posts
-
Moicano is going to make a MUCH better showing than people realize.- Latest: PaddyO'malley
-
Did your friends create any rituals outsiders wouldn’t have understood?- Latest: Kowboy On Sherdog
-
