- Joined
- Oct 6, 2008
- Messages
- 32,883
- Reaction score
- 41,992
What do you you think was the worst case of a match up so bad that it appeared that one fighter was basically sacrificed to boost another rising fighter’s resume? I am not talking about one-sided beatdowns, just questionable matchups with significant record differences.
I think that Bisping vs Sinosic (UFC 70- 2007) fits that bill. Bisping had won TUF a year prior, and he was already hugely popular in the UK. UFC 70 was the first ever UFC card in Manchester, which was also Bisping’s hometown.
Michael was definitely a rising star with a 12-0 record at the time, which is why I was surprised when they matched him up with Elvis Sinosic, who had a 7-9-2 record at that point. While records don’t tell the whole story, it definitely looked like this match up was made to guarantee a solid victory for the local favourite.
Any other example come to mind?
I think that Bisping vs Sinosic (UFC 70- 2007) fits that bill. Bisping had won TUF a year prior, and he was already hugely popular in the UK. UFC 70 was the first ever UFC card in Manchester, which was also Bisping’s hometown.
Michael was definitely a rising star with a 12-0 record at the time, which is why I was surprised when they matched him up with Elvis Sinosic, who had a 7-9-2 record at that point. While records don’t tell the whole story, it definitely looked like this match up was made to guarantee a solid victory for the local favourite.
Any other example come to mind?