War Room Lounge v97: Jesus Christ, you're even pedantic with foreplay.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hildawg has the reputation of being the opposite of mean? Do you live on Earth?

Yeah, but if you get your info from the nuttersphere, you probably don't recognize it.

Came up in a recent discussion so here:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-electing-hillary-in-16-is-more-important-than-electing-obama-in-08

The most famous woman in the world would walk through the White House with no entourage, casually chatting up junior staffers along the way. She was by far the most prepared, impressive person at every Cabinet meeting. She worked harder and logged more miles than anyone in the administration, including the president. And she’d spend large amounts of time and energy on things that offered no discernible benefit to her political future—saving elephants from ivory poachers, listening to the plight of female coffee farmers in Timor-Leste, defending LGBT rights in places like Uganda.

Most of all—and you hear this all the time from people who’ve worked for her—Hillary Clinton is uncommonly warm and thoughtful. She surprises with birthday cakes. She calls when a grandparent passes away. She once rearranged her entire campaign schedule so a staffer could attend her daughter’s preschool graduation. Her husband charms by talking to you; Hillary does it by listening to you—not in a head-nodding, politician way; in a real person way.

This same story has repeated itself throughout Clinton’s career: those who initially view her as distrustful and divisive from afar find her genuine and cooperative in person. It was the case with voters in New York, Republicans in the Senate, Obama people in the White House, and heads of state all over the world. There’s a reason being America’s chief diplomat was the specific job Obama asked Hillary to do—she has the perfect personality for it.

That seems like a pretty typical set of observations from people who actually interact with her. You can hate her party or policy preferences or whatever, but her reputation in terms of how she treats people on an individual level is pretty bulletproof.

And this is really 1st year stuff anyway. It's called 'defamation by implication'. It's like saying publicly "The guy takes pictures of little kids ffs"
He didn't call the other party a :eek::eek::eek::eek:phile but the implication was clear. That constitutes grounds for a civil suit.
work with me here, m8

I was joking about you saying that it was good to see someone finally "stand up" to someone who has been smeared more than anyone in public life. But if you actually think another of Gabbard's crazy lawsuits has any merit, I'd be happy to make a bet about it.
 
The sweet old grandma who took you in and adopted you when your parents died, but who actually murdered your parents and had Yuri and Oleg push their car off a cliff so as to keep them from taking share in her late husband's estate, but who feels guilty about killing them so she takes you in, but in actuality she knows that when you become of legal age your share in the estate will vest so she's slowly instigating an eventual cardiac episode in you by breaking up amphetamines and counterfeit heart pills into your favorite butterscotch ice cream so that you die and she can have the estate all to herself and retire on a private island with her many friends who are publicly renowned to rape people.

That grandma, amirite?
d43c6e3ab48ac9e5f6e5e02b8ca5e6a0.gif
 
Our neighbor texted my wife that they could hear Harvey howling and were worried.

I responded that he's a beagle and they howl. Amazon delivery probably got him excited.

Than I get home and he doesn't bum rush me at the door so get nervous.

Run around looking for him until I hear him crying from the basement.

He got in there closed the door on himself and ate an entire bag of food shit all over the basement before trying to claw through the door for God knows how long
Your dog is a creep.

A lovable wubbable whoozergoozerfuzzerwuzzer whose-a-good-boy-youre-a-good-boy creep, but still a creep
 
Our neighbor texted my wife that they could hear Harvey howling and were worried.

I responded that he's a beagle and they howl. Amazon delivery probably got him excited.

Than I get home and he doesn't bum rush me at the door so get nervous.

Run around looking for him until I hear him crying from the basement.

He got in there closed the door on himself and ate an entire bag of food shit all over the basement before trying to claw through the door for God knows how long

Lol

Classic Harvey
 
Yeah, but if you get your info from the nuttersphere, you probably don't recognize it.

Came up in a recent discussion so here:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-electing-hillary-in-16-is-more-important-than-electing-obama-in-08



That seems like a pretty typical set of observations from people who actually interact with her. You can hate her party or policy preferences or whatever, but her reputation in terms of how she treats people on an individual level is pretty bulletproof.



I was joking about you saying that it was good to see someone finally "stand up" to someone who has been smeared more than anyone in public life. But if you actually think another of Gabbard's crazy lawsuits has any merit, I'd be happy to make a bet about it.

SMH, good grief man, Shillary's temper tantrums are the stuff of legend without even reading a Klein book. That's why a whopping 70% of women during the '16
election felt "no connection" to her. She attempted to trivialize it claiming it was a "likability issue". Speaking of hating her party, with her recent divisive swipes at Sanders, all Dems should be sending her a loud and clear message to SHUT THE FUCK UP.

and just a ridiculous, fawning piece of trash from a speech writer. (who's living in the Nuttershpere now?) I have never read that Hildawg was 'warm and thoughtful' anywhere, ever.
As a liberal Democrat, you should be very worried about your party. I'm a libertarian so I have no regard for either Reps or Dems, greedy pompous
charlatans that they are.
 
Last edited:
SMH, good grief man, Shillary's temper tantrums are the stuff of legend without even reading a Klein book. That's why a whopping 70% of women during the '16
election felt "no connection" to her. She attempted to trivialize it claiming it was a "likability issue".

I think there have been some right-wing LEO nuts who have tried to push that, but it hasn't really stuck. In fact, the thing that internet losers tend to hate about Clinton is that she's well-liked by people who work with her (framed differently, but that's what it amounts to).

Speaking of hating her party, with her recent divisive swipes at Sanders, all Dems should be sending her a loud and clear message to SHUT THE FUCK UP.

I mean, most people don't talk that way, but, yeah, the recent Bernie thing was ill-advised, and I think a lot of people are upset.

and just a ridiculous, fawning piece of trash from a speech writer. (who's living in the Nuttershpere now?) I have never read that Hildawg was 'warm and thoughtful' anywhere, ever.

It's just his personal observations, and, as noted, they are typical. Another set: https://www.vox.com/a/hillary-clinton-interview/the-gap-listener-leadership-quality.

As a liberal Democrat, you should be very worried about your party. I'm a Libertarian so I have no regard for either Reps or Dems, greedy pompous
charlatans that they are.

Funny dangler in that first sentence. I would imagine that Libertarians (big L, so supporters of the party) should be very, very worried about their party. 3% in the last presidential election, 0 seats in either house of Congress. And did you see their convention? Yikes! Not a pompous group (I'll give you that), but they're defined by greed and a failure to understand policy.
 
Our neighbor texted my wife that they could hear Harvey howling and were worried.

I responded that he's a beagle and they howl. Amazon delivery probably got him excited.

Than I get home and he doesn't bum rush me at the door so get nervous.

Run around looking for him until I hear him crying from the basement.

He got in there closed the door on himself and ate an entire bag of food shit all over the basement before trying to claw through the door for God knows how long
Oh no, Harvey! That poor, dumb pupper...
 
I think there have been some right-wing LEO nuts who have tried to push that, but it hasn't really stuck. In fact, the thing that internet losers tend to hate about Clinton is that she's well-liked by people who work with her (framed differently, but that's what it amounts to).



I mean, most people don't talk that way, but, yeah, the recent Bernie thing was ill-advised, and I think a lot of people are upset.



It's just his personal observations, and, as noted, they are typical. Another set: https://www.vox.com/a/hillary-clinton-interview/the-gap-listener-leadership-quality.



Funny dangler in that first sentence. I would imagine that Libertarians (big L, so supporters of the party) should be very, very worried about their party. 3% in the last presidential election, 0 seats in either house of Congress. And did you see their convention? Yikes! Not a pompous group (I'll give you that), but they're defined by greed and a failure to understand policy.

Source 'right wing LEO nuts' for us if you please and demonstrate this 'push' you describe. Sounds a bit desperate and inflammatory IMO.

Speaking of LEO, I remember when Shillary was at a public function where a canine officer with a dog was standing near her. She recoiled when she felt the dog
sniffing at her, saying "Get that fucking thing away from me." Such a kind remark to a handler and a dog more important than she could ever be. But the officer was no doubt an LEO nut.
www.nationalreview.com › 2016/10 › hillary-clinton-security-detail-c...Hillary Clinton's Security Detail Curses & Foul Mouth ...
nypost.com › 2015/10/02 › secret-service-agents-hillary-is-a-nightmar...Secret Service agents: Hillary is a nightmare to work with
and on and on and on...'well liked by people who work with her' LMAO.
but to sycophants like yourself, nothing will convince you of her being a total fucking bitch
and, more importantly, a totally ineffective political entity. the clintons are dead, thank God.
www.theguardian.com › us-news › apr › hillary-clinton-donald-trump...Hillary Clinton unleashed foul-mouthed tirade in Trump ...
 
Last edited:
Source 'right wing LEO nuts' for us if you please and demonstrate this 'push' you describe. Sounds a bit desperate and inflammatory IMO.

Speaking of LEO, I remember when Shillary was at a public function where a canine officer with a dog was standing near her. She recoiled when she felt the dog
sniffing at her, saying "Get that fucking thing away from me." Such a kind remark to a handler and a dog more important than she could ever be. But the officer was no doubt an LEO nut.
www.nationalreview.com › 2016/10 › hillary-clinton-security-detail-c...Hillary Clinton's Security Detail Curses & Foul Mouth ...
nypost.com › 2015/10/02 › secret-service-agents-hillary-is-a-nightmar...Secret Service agents: Hillary is a nightmare to work with
and on and on and on...'well liked by people who work with her' LMAO.
but to sycophants like yourself, nothing will convince you of her being a total fucking bitch
and, more importantly, a totally ineffective political entity. the clintons are dead, thank God.
www.theguardian.com › us-news › apr › hillary-clinton-donald-trump...Hillary Clinton unleashed foul-mouthed tirade in Trump ...

Both links are to the same source, and, be honest, a lot of that stuff is obviously made-up (from the link: While running for US Senate, Hillary stopped at an upstate New York 4-H Club. As one Secret Service agent says, Hillary saw farmers and cows and then erupted. “She turned to a staffer and said, ‘What the f - - - did we come here for? There’s no money here.’ ”). How do you respond to all the stories that paint a realistic and believable story told by people from different walks of life?
 
So if I know for sure that the poster isn’t gay I can use the f word?

I'm not even allowed to use it.

I would say it's not filtered because it's simply not nearly as common of a slur as the f-word and doesn't have near the historical venom (just like "fairy" or "nancy" doesn't for gay men). The f-word for gay people might be the single most hateful slur in the English language.

True. The N-word doesn't have an actual equivalent, but that would be the gay version. There's not really an instance where the six letter form isn't intended and/or taken as spiteful with an overtly derisive and hostile edge; ":eek::eek::eek:" or (formerly?) "queer" is pretty mundane by comparison, nevermind the others - fairy is funny, nancy sounds gross.
 
Our neighbor texted my wife that they could hear Harvey howling and were worried.

I responded that he's a beagle and they howl. Amazon delivery probably got him excited.

Than I get home and he doesn't bum rush me at the door so get nervous.

Run around looking for him until I hear him crying from the basement.

He got in there closed the door on himself and ate an entire bag of food shit all over the basement before trying to claw through the door for God knows how long

Poor pupper, but that's a remarkably good neighbor you have there. I'm sure their text was born partially or majorly of their annoyance at the sound, but they still tried to give you a heads up your doggo sounded like they were in distress
 
Both links are to the same source, and, be honest, a lot of that stuff is obviously made-up (from the link: While running for US Senate, Hillary stopped at an upstate New York 4-H Club. As one Secret Service agent says, Hillary saw farmers and cows and then erupted. “She turned to a staffer and said, ‘What the f - - - did we come here for? There’s no money here.’ ”). How do you respond to all the stories that paint a realistic and believable story told by people from different walks of life?
Complete blather and pointless innuendo. How does one respond?
70%! of women felt NO connection to her. That should have been her base ffs.
even Hollywood, traditionally lefty loonies, refused to lock step in her ranks.

www.theguardian.com › film › nov › susan-sarandon-i-thought-hillary-...Susan Sarandon: 'I thought Hillary was very dangerous. If she ...

and I like that you couldn't back up your obvious disposable comment about 'LEO nuts'. pretty irresponsible IMO.
try not to get so emotionally involved.
 
I didn't mention the first time, but again you're trying to move the goalposts to it to a spot you like.
t/he rest of your post makes sense, but I don’t know what you’re trying to say here; the first time? How am I moving the goal posts? We’re talking about judging somebody’s character (calling them a pussy) because they liked a post.
That’s stupid on its face.

The conclusion is that a poster agrees with or endorses a statement. that's not a judgment on their character but rather the conclusion about their opinion.
Okay, so its actually you who is moving the goalposts, because somebody’s character was in fact judged for liking a post, not only in this thread, the origins of this very conversation even, but its a trend that has been going on for a while now.

And frankly we're able to draw whatever conclusions, as long as we can provide some type of explanation or evidence for it.
Of course we are, we possess free will. People judge others based on all sorts of stupid reasons.

If I make a post that states:


Anung is a scumbag

And someone likes it, there's not a whole lot of ambiguity there.

And once again, it's silly to pretend there is.

No, but if I make a post that states:

Look, Spin, you piece of shit, of course gay people should be afforded the same civil rights as every other red blooded human being on this planet.

And somebody likes it, then there is a whole lot of ambiguity there.

But, back to your hypothetical post: if somebody liked that post, they would out themselves as somebody who thought I was a scumbag, at least for that moment in time, it doesn’t mean they’re a hero, a coward, smart, dumb, etc. It just means they agreed with that posters poor opinion of me at that moment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top