- Joined
- Aug 20, 2009
- Messages
- 49,797
- Reaction score
- 34,099
I'm not going to go back over the entire exchange with you, but I suggest you reconsider your claim that you made no assertion if you do and you still think I'm in the wrong, I guess being ignored by you wouldn't be a bad thing for me.Dude, it’s not ironic at all, but if you’re going to quote posts unrelated to you in order to take jabs lmk so I can put you on ignore. I normally like your posts but I don’t feel like addressing shit like this.
As to "I don’t feel like addressing shit like this", then go ahead and put me on ignore, or why not just do better? You replied to this,
With this,...Is it known that Trump knew who was supplying WiliLeaks?
Do you think this answers the question? Instead, don't you think it ignores the significance of what I said or is even entirely dismissive? And you don't feel like addressing shit?Gates testified that Stone called Trump and although he didn't hear the call afterwards Trump turned to him and said they're getting more dirt from wikileaks. It's really bad.
So you can take this constructively and we can just drop it and move on, or you can take your ball and go home. Your choice. Either way that's my last word on this too.