- Joined
- Aug 20, 2009
- Messages
- 50,718
- Reaction score
- 35,561
I saw it. This reply is proof.Prove it.
So, in other words, you feel like it's a big issue but you have no evidence for it. If I were you, that alone would be cause enough for me to leave my unjustified opinion out of the discussion of whether taxes should go to social programs except in the case where I offer it to elicit said evidence or evidence to the contrary.Ok. Welfare was highly abused in the neighbourhoods I grew up in. And worse yet, it was used to buy guns and drugs indiscriminately, which ultimately destroyed and ravished entire neighbourhoods. No there is no hard data for any of this because it would be impossible to pursue especially with the whole ‘no snitching’ dialogue in certain areas.
For evidence to the contrary, I give you the GFC. If that's not enough, I give you the perpetrators of the crimes by SNC Lavalin that have proved such an issue for Trudeau. Now, how do you feel? Still think crack dealers are a good enough reason to restrict social programs?