- Joined
- Mar 29, 2019
- Messages
- 22,680
- Reaction score
- 25,910
What about examining or locating the bottoms of your shoes has lead you to a different political inclination?
You're late to the punch here bud. @A.C. beat you to it
What about examining or locating the bottoms of your shoes has lead you to a different political inclination?
These responses are baseless and also seem melodramatic. Nothing I posted suggests I do not "respect knowledge and expertise". I did not "dismiss" a single source of knowledge, let along "all sources....that don't cater to my biases". This is way over the top, even for you, Mr. Jack. I wonder if it's your emotional side coming out again.
The point of my post was that I wanted to try to understand your basis for ranking news outlets. By at least one metric (featuring stories of little/no practical importance in prominent front-page locations), Washington Post is clearly lagging behind WSJ and FT. I subscribe to WSJ; everything on the current front page is more important than that n-word story that the Washington Post featured.
As for the relative/absolute scale thing: I didn't write that the Washington Post "sucks". Read more carefully. The point of journalism is supposed to be something like "offering consumers an accurate overview of the day's most important stories with ethics and accuracy." The WaPo's featuring of junk articles in some of its most prominent locations seems to violate the first part of that mission, and some of its competitors are doing a better job, right? Furthermore, there are situations in which all options are bad on an absolute scale even if there are relative differences. All the grocery stores in the hood can be awful even if CrapMart is better than TrashDepot.
Anyway, my goal was to understand your view better. You ought not be so combative. It impedes discourse.
The Financial Times and The Wall Street Journal. I used to subscribe to The Economist but it did start to decline a bit. It's probably still better than Washington Post for topics other than US politics and DC Area news.
No, Mr. Hig, I did not. Please do not see what you want to see. Seek truth.
By this line of reasoning, we can't fault Breitbart for featuring "illegal immigrant commits crime"-type stories out of proportion with other crimes so long as the details of the stories aren't wrong. @Jack V Savage has consistently rejecting your line of thinking in his attacks on Breitbart.
Interesting guess. On what do you base it?
Nice. I wish I had tried it back when I did lift. I haven’t for about three years now. Grappling is still keeping me in shape but my bench is probably awful right now.
@waiguoren, I want to dedicate these next few beers to you.
What kind of beers?
What kind of beers?
He's gone to the big body bag in the sky.
RIP Johnny
Just miller lite, I'm a simple kind of guy.
More like carbonated piss but close enough."Light beer" in the US means a low carb, mid strength beer right?
"Light beer" in the US means a low carb, mid strength beer right?
More like carbonated piss but close enough.
Yea.
What about examining or locating the bottoms of your shoes has lead you to a different political inclination?
Just miller lite, I'm a simple kind of guy.
That's exactly what it is haha!!! Towards the end of the month two of my friends and I always do a chest day together and try to do a combine 225lbs bench press run. I've crashed around 16-18 reps but got 19 for the first time today. Most hyped and pissed I've been at the same time in a long time lol. Might take a couple of months to get to that 20.
I think part of the problem is that when it comes to the issue of wealth inequality its often framed by some progressives in an "us vs them" manner so when you move from being one of "us" to being one of "them" your view of that issue will change.One of my friends that was a hardcore "Obama change we can believe in" tattoo on his ass type of dude is now a Republican. Why the change in the middle of the MAGA era of all eras? Because he makes significantly more money than he did around the 2012ish time and now talks about how Democrats would force him to pay much higher taxes and how they support lazy people. How he's worked so hard etc etc blah blah. Things that if I even dare mention a few years ago he'd argue all day with me. But now that he sees it may potentially impact his finances if we go too progressive so doesn't approve of Democrats anymore.
Anecdotal ftw lol. How quickly the tide turns when your own self-interests are at stake. I've been trolling him non-stop because he gave me hell for a decade. I'll have to keep my eye on you all to see if your positions switch as your financials improve. In 2023 when you finally get that promotion you were passed up on four times, I'll be here watching to see if you change. Yes you, all of you. You know who you are. You.
/rant
Yes I've acknowledged this twice in posts #183 and #186, making you slower to catch on than me.
What joke did I steal and from whom BTW? We've got two resident self-appointed comedic geniuses here who aren't funny for shit so I didn't get it from them.