- Joined
- Jul 28, 2010
- Messages
- 79,456
- Reaction score
- 65,723
My point is the same as it's always been. It's just that you were lying about what it was because you think it's reasonable but you want to portray me as unreasonable. Here's from my very first post in the thread:
"It's a lock that he'll accuse his opponent this time of being a criminal and not as certain that law enforcement won't go along with it."
I stand behind that 100%. He'll accuse his opponent of being a criminal, and the chances that law enforcement will go along with that are higher than they were when he pulled that in 2016.
Cherry picking your own post...LOL. Priceless. Here's some more:
Imagine if he were to lose and start demanding mass arrests or something as president.
Like, just imagine that, man!
Our democracy hasn't been in greater danger since the Civil War.
Hysterical Liberal Hyperbole for $200, Alex.
You
=
