War Room Lounge V38: Edgar Allan Pwn's 'The Cask of a Modillado'

[Anung Un Rama]

Best combination of taste, cost, and availability. It's gotta be in the can too.

Some guys like it in the can

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Some guys like it in the can

I'll take your word for it.

 

[Anung Un Rama]

I'll take your word for it.

but you just said....

 

[JudoThrowFiasco]

You're such a philistine.

1. Baja Blast
2a. Original
2b. Code Red
4. Pitch Black
5. Voltage
6. Whatever that violet one is
7. Black Label
8. Whiteout
9. Livewire

Unranked: Ice (haven't tried it)

If we just a did a character profile on you based on your diet, choice of beverages and your chain smoking history, while disregarding your race, profession and academic background, you would be the king of sherdogs white trash

 

[Trotsky]

If we just a did a character profile on you based on your diet, choice of beverages and your chain smoking history, while disregarding your race, profession and academic background, you would be the king of sherdogs white trash

Yuck, no chain smoking. I only smoke about a pack a week nowadays. Most was a half a pack a day when I was in college.

When I used to be a heavier drinker, I'd say my liquor consumption was moderately bourgeois. Go-to's were Buffalo Trace bourbon and Purus Vodka. About $25 for a fifth of either. I stand by both as the absolute best values in terms of quality for your buck. But if I was feeling like a real ritzy bitch, I would sometimes get a local small batch bourbon for $60-70 a fifth.

 

[JudoThrowFiasco]

Yuck, no chain smoking. I only smoke about a pack a week nowadays. Most was a half a pack a day when I was in college.

When I used to be a heavier drinker, I'd say my liquor consumption was moderately bourgeois. Go-to's were Buffalo Trace bourbon and Purus Vodka. About $25 for a fifth of either. I stand by both as the absolute best values in terms of quality for your buck. But if I was feeling like a real ritzy bitch, I would sometimes get a local small batch bourbon for $60-70 a fifth.

Sorry I thought you once said you were a pack a day. Nevertheless, fried cheese curds and Mountain Dew -- that's northern Quebec levels of white people

 

[JDragon]

It was suppose to have a chain reaction but alas, the WR failed us.

 

[Lead]

 

[Trotsky]

Sorry I thought you once said you were a pack a day. Nevertheless, fried cheese curds and Mountain Dew -- that's northern Quebec levels of white people

Yeah, I probably did say that. I actually was a pack a day for my sophomore year of college when I lived in an apartment where you could smoke inside. But I attach that to my level of drinking at that time. When I would drink, or on the occasions that I drink now, I smoke like a chimney. Once I got down to only drinking on the weekends, it declined heavily.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

Based on the shake-up, leadership is clearly in question. Watch yourself.

 

[BarryDillon]

If Edgar Allen Poe were here, i'm pretty sure he'd call @BarryDillon a philistine

Quoth the Dillon, "Lick my balls.".

 

[JDragon]

Based on the shake-up, leadership is clearly in question. Watch yourself.

Yep. Leedership. Not Laddership.

@Lead

 

[Sketch]

Best combination of taste, cost, and availability. It's gotta be in the can too.

I swear they changed the recipe. As a kid it was amazing. Now I don't like it as much as dads root beer or Stewart's.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

I swear they changed the recipe. As a kid it was amazing. Now I don't like it as much as dads root beer or Stewart's.

Maybe. But then would it be Old Tyme? Let's start a class-action over deceptive marketing.

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

@sickc0d3r

A nice surprise with Keto is one our preferred meals entirely makes the cut.

• Flank steak
• Fried egg
• Avocado slices
• Pico-ish salsa
• Chimichurri

 

[Tycho- Taylor's Version]

I don't want to get all back into it @Cubo de Sangre, but your P6 in the other thread doesn't repair your syllogism.

Just as a exercise in identifying logical validity, you should be able to see that unless censoring is literally the exact same thing as de-platforming, the premises do not guarantee the truth of the conclusion. I say this having ditched any shits I may have given about the content or argument at all - the same holds true for the bacon syllogism as well.

Remember that validity means there can be no possible way for the conclusion to be false when the premises are true.


I did have an idea for a future thread, but I've gotta spend some time with it so it doesn't just become a truism or break down along predictable lines.

 

[Tycho- Taylor's Version]

Also.. crane-block battery?

 

[Cubo de Sangre]

I don't want to get all back into it @Cubo de Sangre, but your P6 in the other thread doesn't repair your syllogism.

Just as a exercise in identifying logical validity, you should be able to see that unless censoring is literally the exact same thing as de-platforming, the premises do not guarantee the truth of the conclusion. I say this having ditched any shits I may have given about the content or argument at all - the same holds true for the bacon syllogism as well.

Yeah, this is an exercise in logic, not a rehashing of the thread.

Why you think "de-platform" and "censor" need to cover the exact same ground. If you wanna get super nitpicky let me first tighten things up (added in green)...

P1: "De-platforming" by social media is a form of censorship
P2: The term Censorship has a generally negative connotation
P3: De-platforming has a neutral or positive connotation by comparison
P4: Choosing to substitute a more positive word/term to avoid negative connotation is a euphemism
P5: This type of euphemism is Orwellian
P6: The presence of this euphemism alone is enough to elevate the usage to be categorized as Orwellian
C: Calling social-media censorship "de-platforming" is Orwellian.

Remember that validity means there can be no possible way for the conclusion to be false when the premises are true.

Yep. What's missing?

I'll point out, I did enough to change @VivaRevolution's mind with this method. And I did it acknowledging P1 as a fact, not hiding from the truth of it.

I did have an idea for a future thread, but I've gotta spend some time with it so it doesn't just become a truism or break down along predictable lines.

Hit me up when ready. About a dozen slots left.

 

[spamking]

What in the world?

 

[spamking]

Yeah, this is an exercise in logic, not a rehashing of the thread.

Why you think "de-platform" and "censor" need to cover the exact same ground. If you wanna get super nitpicky let me first tighten things up (added in green)...

P1: "De-platforming" by social media is a form of censorship
P2: The term Censorship has a generally negative connotation
P3: De-platforming has a neutral or positive connotation by comparison
P4: Choosing to substitute a more positive word/term to avoid negative connotation is a euphemism
P5: This type of euphemism is Orwellian
P6: The presence of this euphemism alone is enough to elevate the usage to be categorized as Orwellian
C: Calling social-media censorship "de-platforming" is Orwellian.




Yep. What's missing?

I'll point out, I did enough to change @VivaRevolution's mind with this method. And I did it acknowledging P1 as a fact, not hiding from the truth of it.




Hit me up when ready. About a dozen slots left.

Rogan and Shapiro discussed "de-platforming" this week . . .