- Joined
- Jun 14, 2009
- Messages
- 28,908
- Reaction score
- 15,212
I have yet to read something along those lines, where are you getting the idea they are doing away with all reporting standards?
https://www.ed.gov/news/press-relea...-strengthen-title-ix-protections-all-students
I'm not seeing that there
The Department also intends to leave postsecondary institutions wide discretion to craft and implement the recipient’s own employee reporting policy to decide (as to employees who are not the Title IX Coordinator and not officials with authority) which employees are mandatory reporters (i.e., employees who must report sexual harassment to the Title IX Coordinator), which employees may listen to a student’s or employee’s disclosure of sexual harassment without being required to report it to the Title IX Coordinator, and/or which employees must report sexual harassment to the Title IX Coordinator but only with the complainant’s consent. No matter how a college or university designates its employees with respect to mandatory reporting to the Title IX Coordinator, the final regulations ensure that students at postsecondary institutions, as well as employees, are notified of the Title IX Coordinator’s contact information and have clear reporting channels, including options accessible even during non-business hours,159 for reporting sexual harassment in order to trigger the postsecondary institution’s response obligations.
Without a centralized definition of who mandatory reporters are, you're leaving a gaping hole that schools can use to minimize any civil damage to the school. Especially with respect to athletics, the first person to learn about an indiscretion is often the coach or another AD official with some sort of clout in the program. Unless the school then defines it, they would not be under any requirement to report it to the Title IX office and then begin a formal investigation. I mentioned Nassar for a reason, because Michigan State did just that, decided to quell any reports made in order to limit the scope of liability that they had in his indiscretions. Keeping the reporting standards in the hands of the schools who have been known to act in their own self interests is a quick way to only pursuing particularly notable cases instead of all cases reported to any level of the university.
The regs assume that Universities will craft robust reporting policies because it's "best practice", but history has told us it's just a gaping loophole there to be exploited when convenient.