Views on steroids

The 2 primary anti-steroid arguments are as follows:

1 * Health concerns.

2 * Performance enhancement.

Concerning position 1, it is evident that much of what is espoused in the media, is outright bullshit. As such the argument does not hold as much water as assumed.

Concerning position 2, in a future time, it is plausible to assume that the performance enhancing effects of supplementation will surpass steroids benefits, and I
 
my views:

1. i probably wont ever use them. i dont care if others do. provided that...
2. it is not expressly forbidden by their sport of choice.
 
King Kabuki said:
Coleman's stomach is suspect moreso of Synthol than GH within the BB community.

Nope. Synthol is used as a site injectable in order to inflate a specific bodypart. Normally used for things like tri's and rear delts by a lot of bodybuilders. I've never even heard of a bodybuilder trying to shoot synthol into their stomach.

GH gut and 'hormone gut' is widely discussed by on the BB forums. Ronnie Coleman's (and a lot of the other mass monsters') guts are generally attibuted to GH and insulin abuse. Definately NOT synthol.
 
ENTROPY said:
The 2 primary anti-steroid arguments are as follows:

1 * Health concerns.

2 * Performance enhancement.

Concerning position 1, it is evident that much of what is espoused in the media, is outright bullshit. As such the argument does not hold as much water as assumed.

Concerning position 2, in a future time, it is plausible to assume that the performance enhancing effects of supplementation will surpass steroids benefits, and I
 
A lot of people like to point to the claim that 'no death can be directly attributed to steroid use'. Most studies will look to correlation though, not causation though.

If we look at steroid users as a population, you will find numerous incidences of health problems greater than that of the general population. The conclusion would be that there is a correlation between steroid use and heart problems, etc.


*note* Although I fully expect to be flamed for the above post please know what the difference is between correlation and causation before doing so. *note*
 
thomas87 said:
I read that MMA athletes have a relaxed view on steroids.


So I'm wondering what my fellow sherdoggers think of steroids.

Are you using it yourself, or do you think it's okay. Or do you hate it? Or something else?

I myself couldn't care more about what others do with their bodies. But I myself? Hell no, I'm never using that shit. With that I'm not automatically saying that it's all bad effects. Most sideeffects, if not all can be worked with other medicaments. What worries me most is the fact that the heart, liver, lungs and digestive system are all muscles -- I figured(maybe wrongfully) that since steroids make muscles grow, the mentioned muscles will grow as well. No, I'm not taking my chances on steroids.

So, what do you guys think of this?

My view on steroids is that a man has a right to do whatever he wants to his own body.
BUT, if you're going to put something in your body, it would be wise to know what it's going to do to you. Then there's that whole law thing. Steroids are illegal w/o perscription. Do your homework, weigh the pros and cons and if you still want to do them, man up and make the decision. Steroids are not the best thing you can put in your body, but neither is fastfood and millions of people eat that shit 3 times daily. Good luck
 
Excellent post Bacon. I can really respect your viewpoint when put that way.
 
KOU In3 said:
Excellent post Bacon. I can really respect your viewpoint when put that way.

Thanks, but several posters have said essentially the same thing.

For some reason there is a reluctance (for most people) towards self education. It's just easier to take someone else's word for it than do your homework and draw your own conclusions. If you don't educate yourself, someone else will do it for you... This is why I firmly believe that television should be outlawed to everyone under 65. This, shall be my masters thesis. *steps off soapbox, slaps Ted Turner...*
 
if ronnie coleman was spot injecting synthol into his stomach and gut, he'd be dead already. And what about all those rockstars that are still alive today, they are far worse drug abusers (cocaine, etc.) than pro wrestlers, but the pro-wrestlers drop like flys.

you are saying it's alright because it helps improve someones size and strength for a sport, and that's what i pay to see. BUT IT IS NOT ALRIGHT BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE RULES. this is where we msut draw the line, if you are gonna look past steroid rules, why not just get bionic arm implants, anamantium reinforced bones... that's ridiculous.

when athletes use steroids, they only use as much as they can get away with without getting caught, unlike something like prowrestling where no one really cares, that's why you see these guys drop like flies.

and no one knows the long term effects of steroid use, some could say you look at arnold etc. and see what's up with them. arnold regrets using and has had heart surgeries because of it, franco culombo regrets using and has had subsequent heart problems, and lou ferrigno probably has the worst of it. and the best part about those guys is they were using roids in the 70s, roids today are 10 times stronger, you can't even compare them.

but i totally understand the guys who are like, it shows that they are weak. i can understand big juice in a sport like pro bb, or weightlift where it is directly applicable, but in mma technique and mental toughness are alot more important than physical attributes, and someone who is looking for juice is usually alot more undisciplined and the juice itself makes you so terribly weak minded.

oh an btw, i can buy 1kg of creatine for about 40 bucks (canadian) that'll last you half a year atleast, that's pretty cheap dude...
 
I can't believe how helpful and considerate you ppl were in this thread yet you all bashed the hell out of mine. This is ridiculous, I can't believe these are even the same ppl that posted in my thread. I'm starting to wonder about the ppl that post in the section...
 
King Kabuki said:
Oh and one more thing, to point out just how hypocritical people can be on this issue let me break down something you said here for a moment.

You said:



And then just before that you say:



...insinuating that steroids are different from cigs because they improve your game.

So uhh...which is it? Is it wrong to take them because they improve your game and cheating is wrong? Or is it wrong to take them because they actually don't improve your game and it's just insecurity?

You can't have it both ways.

you misunderstood me on that. obviously cigs are not going to help you at all, and with steroids, who said taking steroids is going to make you a better fighter?...you can analyse my opinion all you want, bottomline is I dont give a shit about what others think on the matter, I was expressing me opinion on the matter, take it for what little worth is has...
 
Fight4Money said:
I can't believe how helpful and considerate you ppl were in this thread yet you all bashed the hell out of mine. This is ridiculous, I can't believe these are even the same ppl that posted in my thread. I'm starting to wonder about the ppl that post in the section...


Your Thread....
fight4money said:
I've been doing my homework on the various types of performance enhancing supplements (Steroids). I was wondering which one you feel is the best overall for strength and performance. My buddy has just finished a bottle of Testerone Enanthate and is now using winstrol (stanozol). It seems to be working pretty damn well for him, but after seeing all the different types I thought I would ask some other people for their opinion. I was looking into the Testosterone Suspension with a stack of Deca. Any feedback you can give would be greatly appreciated.

Thomas87's thread...
thomas87 said:
I read that MMA athletes have a relaxed view on steroids. So I'm wondering what my fellow sherdoggers think of steroids. Are you using it yourself, or do you think it's okay. Or do you hate it? Or something else? I myself couldn't care more about what others do with their bodies. But I myself? Hell no, I'm never using that shit. With that I'm not automatically saying that it's all bad effects. Most sideeffects, if not all can be worked with other medicaments. What worries me most is the fact that the heart, liver, lungs and digestive system are all muscles -- I figured(maybe wrongfully) that since steroids make muscles grow, the mentioned muscles will grow as well. No, I'm not taking my chances on steroids.
So, what do you guys think of this?

You (Fight4money) asked "what's the best juice?" implying that members of sherdog use steroids or are in some way an authority on the matter. Your question was a subliminal insult to all who have put in the time and effort and have remained chemical free while doing so. Even so, you got honest responses and replied in an acerbic manor because no one told you out right which "juice" was best.

Thomas87 asked for "views on steroids which started an open debate between sherdoggers on both sides of the fence.

The only people that can honestly answer the question "what's the best juice?" are people that have tried many different varieties of said substance, or have studied the substance closely. While there may be sherdoggers with this type of insight, I doubt they would just hand you the answer after posting comments like...

fight4money said:
Takes WAY too long and WAY too much work to do it all natural. Not to mention you would be surprised how many people use a little "help". Also, Unlike you I have a life and I don't like wasting all my free time in a gym filled with stinkin ass monkeys.

With this comment, you basically insulted the only people with the knowledge you're looking for, which are the individuals who put in their time, busted their asses in the gym and educated themselves for years before making the decision to use steroids. Why should they hand you something that they had to work so hard for?

Everything in your thread says you're lazy and you just want to look good. Which is perfectly fine and legal. You just posted that particular thread in the wrong forum. Next time try the wasteland.
 
steroids is cheating. i think its a shame that people especially in fighting use them...

and people who use them to get big are just fuckin wimps...

real men lift natural.
 
Fight4Money said:
I can't believe how helpful and considerate you ppl were in this thread yet you all bashed the hell out of mine. This is ridiculous, I can't believe these are even the same ppl that posted in my thread. I'm starting to wonder about the ppl that post in the section...

Yeah but you came across as being really lazy and seemed as if you are looking for some miracle substance to make you look good.
 
you misunderstood me on that. obviously cigs are not going to help you at all, and with steroids, who said taking steroids is going to make you a better fighter?...you can analyse my opinion all you want, bottomline is I dont give a shit about what others think on the matter, I was expressing me opinion on the matter, take it for what little worth is has...

I just think your opinion should be a little more based on complete information is all.

Nope. Synthol is used as a site injectable in order to inflate a specific bodypart. Normally used for things like tri's and rear delts by a lot of bodybuilders. I've never even heard of a bodybuilder trying to shoot synthol into their stomach.

GH gut and 'hormone gut' is widely discussed by on the BB forums. Ronnie Coleman's (and a lot of the other mass monsters') guts are generally attibuted to GH and insulin abuse. Definately NOT synthol.

Firstly, BB forums are hardly what I consider the community. The community more refers to athletes and trainers, not necessarily fans. I'm not part of that community myself either.

Secondly, the things you state are slightly contrary to things I've read. But people are free to publish whatever they like. I've read studies that the GH gut is nothing more than myth, with sound backing as to why. The issue is still debated. I could be wrong, contrary to my tone I'm open to being wrong.

you are saying it's alright because it helps improve someones size and strength for a sport, and that's what i pay to see. BUT IT IS NOT ALRIGHT BECAUSE IT IS AGAINST THE RULES. this is where we msut draw the line, if you are gonna look past steroid rules, why not just get bionic arm implants, anamantium reinforced bones... that's ridiculous.

when athletes use steroids, they only use as much as they can get away with without getting caught, unlike something like prowrestling where no one really cares, that's why you see these guys drop like flies.

and no one knows the long term effects of steroid use, some could say you look at arnold etc. and see what's up with them. arnold regrets using and has had heart surgeries because of it, franco culombo regrets using and has had subsequent heart problems, and lou ferrigno probably has the worst of it. and the best part about those guys is they were using roids in the 70s, roids today are 10 times stronger, you can't even compare them.

If this is directed at me then you might want to re-read the thread. What I'm arguing against in this entire thread is every single person who is using mis or half-information to argue the steriods = evil idea. I have no problem with people not choosing to take them. I don't take them. But I'm just not going to let it slide when people relay specifically wrong information, or act like something is wrong when they don't even really fully understand what they're talking about.

A lot of people like to point to the claim that 'no death can be directly attributed to steroid use'. Most studies will look to correlation though, not causation though.

If we look at steroid users as a population, you will find numerous incidences of health problems greater than that of the general population. The conclusion would be that there is a correlation between steroid use and heart problems, etc.


*note* Although I fully expect to be flamed for the above post please know what the difference is between correlation and causation before doing so. *note*

Since I'm pretty positive this is directed at me I'll answer sans what you may consider flaming:

Causation and correlation are different, obviously. However, that is not the position of the Government or MOST of the people in this thread. The position is steroids WILL kill you or harm you imminently in the end. Correlation can have many different agents that lead to causation. However it is the pattern that if steroids are in correlation, automatically people forget every other aspect of said correlation and only mention steroids as causation. Even if they're given the proper information. Examples:

-All of the people saying Eddie Guerrero died of steroids. No he didn't. Steroids didn't help and possibly advanced his condition, but the Doctors who did the autopsy said he was an imminent walking heart-attack. (This also applies to every Pro Wrestler who has died from ANY drug overdose, so far I've seen twice on this page that Pro Wreslters are dropping like flies...in THIS thread. Which signifies many people here don't even know the causes of death of a lot of these Wrestlers. CAUSES, not correlations...of which there are usually MANY.)

-All of the people saying Arnold has had heart problems because of steroids, who failed to understand the term congenital.

-All of the people who attribute Flex Wheeler's kidney disease to steroids. Again, the steroids didn't help, but it was actually the weight draining and dehydration that made his condition much much worse than it had been previously.

But it's very very easy to take away all of those factors and look for one of the things all of those men had in-common. The use of anabolics. Nevermind any other aspect of their lifestyles. Steroids did it. It's that kind of ignorant perpetuation that I'm arguing against in this thread.
 
LiverThrow said:
and people who use them to get big are just fuckin wimps...

real men lift natural.
Why? What do you know about testosterone? Did you know that within the bulk of the population the amount of testosterone produced naturally operates in a ratio range of 1:6. Yeah, that means a lot of the guys out there are producing 6 times as much testosterone as other guys. That's not even the extreme ends of the curve in natural production.

Hormones are an functioning element of the body. We discovered them through science. I believe in using science to manipulate my body to more efficiently reach my goals.

You wanna fight with sticks, be my guest. I'm bringing a motherfucking gun to the fight.
 
Madmick said:
You wanna fight with sticks, be my guest. I'm bringing a motherfucking gun to the fight.

Funny, this reminds me of a quote on another forum last year when the same subject came up. Someone likened it to digging a hole with a shovel vs. using a backhoe. Me... I'm a shovel guy though.
 
Madmick said:
Why? What do you know about testosterone? Did you know that within the bulk of the population the amount of testosterone produced naturally operates in a ratio range of 1:6. Yeah, that means a lot of the guys out there are producing 6 times as much testosterone as other guys. That's not even the extreme ends of the curve in natural production.

Hormones are an functioning element of the body. We discovered them through science. I believe in using science to manipulate my body to more efficiently reach my goals.

You wanna fight with sticks, be my guest. I'm bringing a motherfucking gun to the fight.

Post of the year!
 
Are there studies proving that roids cause heart attacks, liver damage, premature death? NO.

Are there studies disproving that roids cause heart attacks, liver damage, premature death? NO.

Do I want to find out for myself through personal experience? NO.

Do I think it has greater value to reach a certain level of strength without roids rather than with them? Yes, simply because it is harder.

That being said, it is ok for guys to use as long as they know the risk they are taking, because taking roids is a leap into the unknown.
 
Back
Top