- Joined
- Mar 7, 2006
- Messages
- 44,507
- Reaction score
- 4,195
If your memory is foggy and you're making a strong case, thats kind of absurd. But I don't think its unreasonable to have your opinion swayed by tape watching. Thats kind of the point of doing so lol. I might have joined the "Cote has value" side of the forum if it weren't for a rewatch on the Cote - Saunders fight and a reminder how much slower his hands are, bad his tdd is, and reliant on the right hand he is.
I agree on that, but remember, I've been on here a lot of years in these threads. I've seen several posters (not necessarily current posters) who throughout the years would argue strongly for one guy, flip flop their opinion of it, and then act like a winner regardless. "Man, I knew I should have stuck with my first instinct" or "I'm glad I looked into that more". It was a recurring theme, and especially with livebetting. If you have someone consistently buying out of plays on livebetting, why the hell listen to their pre-fight picks?
It's a public forum so people can do what the hell they want, but the second I see someone try to make strong statements and then flip flop afterwards, I'm done listening to their initial opinion. Who knows if they won't do the same thing again.